Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
rape shield provisions in civil proceedings, discovery and inspection of victims and witnesses, and victims rights.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill prohibits a court from ordering a witness or a victim, as a condition of
allowing testimony in a criminal case involving sexual assault or repeated sexual
assault of a child, sexual assault, or other criminal acts that are sexually motivated,
to submit to a mental examination to assess his or her credibility. This bill also
generally prohibits a defendant from compelling a crime victim to a pretrial
interview or deposition.
Current law provides for compensation to victims of certain crimes and to
health providers who perform certain procedures on victims of a sex offense. The
Department of Justice designs forms for persons applying for compensation. This
bill makes any personally identifiable information about the victim on the form
confidential and not a public record.
Generally, evidence that has the tendency to make the existence of a fact more
probable or less probable (relevant evidence) is admissible in a court action that
involves the issues concerning that fact. Some relevant evidence is excluded from
admission if it creates unfair prejudice, confuses the issues, misleads the jury, or is
repetitious of other evidence. Some relevant evidence, such as the test for the
presence of HIV, is not admissible as evidence to prove a person's character. Some
relevant evidence is not admissible unless the collection of that evidence is done
under certain protocols or by certain persons certified to collect that evidence, such
as the presence of lead in dust.
This bill prohibits, in any civil action seeking damages, the admission of
evidence concerning the sexual conduct of a person who has been the victim of certain
criminal acts, including sexual assault, sexual exploitation by a therapist, and
sexual crimes against children if that evidence is offered to prove the victim engaged
in other sexual conduct or to prove the victim's sexual predisposition. This
prohibition does not apply to evidence of consensual sexual conduct between the
victim and the alleged offender or to evidence of sexual conduct that resulted in the
victim's damages if that evidence is first shown to the court in the judge's chambers
to be related to the victim's damages.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 0
Passed 11–0 Oct 27, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Feb 5, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 11, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Radcliffe, Parisi, Jorgensen, Shilling, Bies, Turner, Hraychuck, Bernard Schaber, Steinbrink, Roys, Staskunas, Berceau and Suder;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Kedzie
- Sep 11, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts
- Sep 21, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 28, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 29, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Parisi
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Dec 10, 2009 · Senate
LRB correction
- Dec 15, 2009 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Feb 4, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Feb 10, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Senator Miller added as a cosponsor
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Feb 16, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 3-2-2010
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 138
- Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly
Published 3-17-2010