Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
Indian child welfare.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Introduction
Current law.
Under current law, the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA),
which governs jurisdiction over child custody proceedings involving an Indian child
and provides certain minimum standards for those proceedings, supercedes the
provisions of the Children's Code and the Juvenile Justice Code in any child custody
proceeding governed by ICWA. For purposes of ICWA, "child custody proceeding"
means any of the following:
1. Any out-of-home care placement, which is any action removing an Indian
child from his or her parent or Indian custodian, that is, an Indian person who has
legal custody of an Indian child under tribal law or custom or state law or to whom
temporary physical custody of an Indian child has been transferred by the Indian
child's parent, for temporary placement in a foster home or institution, from which
the parent or Indian custodian cannot have the Indian child removed on demand, but
not including a placement that is based on an act that would be a crime if committed
by an adult and not including an emergency removal of an Indian child from his or
her parent or Indian custodian to prevent imminent physical harm to the child.
2. A termination of parental rights (TPR) proceeding.
3. A temporary placement of an Indian child in a foster home or institution after
a TPR, but prior to or in lieu of an adoptive placement (preadoptive placement).
4. An adoptive placement.
The bill.
This bill incorporates the jurisdictional provisions of ICWA and the
minimum standards for Indian child custody proceedings established by ICWA into
the provisions of the Children's Code relating to child in need of protection or services
(CHIPS), TPR, and adoption proceedings and the provisions of the Juvenile Justice
Code relating to juvenile in need of protection or services (JIPS) proceedings, other
than proceedings that are based on the commission of an act that would be a crime
if committed by an adult and other than an emergency removal of an Indian child
from the home of his or her parent or Indian custodian to prevent imminent physical
harm to the child.
Jurisdiction
Exclusive tribal jurisdiction.
Under ICWA, an Indian tribe has exclusive
jurisdiction over an Indian child custody proceeding involving an Indian child who
resides or is domiciled within the reservation of the tribe and over an Indian child
who is a ward of a tribal court, regardless of the residence or domicile of the Indian
child, except when jurisdiction is otherwise vested in the state by federal law. This
grant of jurisdiction, however, does not prevent the emergency removal of an Indian
child who resides or is domiciled on a reservation, but who is temporarily located off
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Brooks (R) , Clark (D) , Friske (R) , Grigsby (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Hubler (D) , Huebsch (R) , Kleefisch (R) , Mason (D) , Mursau (R) , Nelson (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Radcliffe (D) , Ripp (R) , Roth (R) , Roys (D) , Seidel (D) , Sheridan (D) , Sherman , Shilling , Sinicki (D) , Smith (D) , Soletski (D) , Tauchen (R) , Turner (D) , Vos (R) , Vruwink (D) , Young (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Oct 9, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Sherman, Grigsby, Roys, Pasch, Young, Berceau, Sinicki, Pope-Roberts, Seidel, Turner, Benedict, Hilgenberg, Shilling, Hubler, Clark, Mason, Nelson, Radcliffe, Soletski, Vruwink, Sheridan, Smith, Mursau, Roth, Kleefisch, Friske, Tauchen, Huebsch, Vos, Brooks and Ripp;Cosponsored by Senators Jauch, Holperin, Vinehout, Coggs, Taylor, Lassa, Kreitlow, Lehman, Hansen, Robson, Risser, Plale, Erpenbach, S. Fitzgerald, Grothman, Olsen and Hopper
- Sep 15, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 16, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly
Senator Schultz added as a cosponsor
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Children and Families
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by committee on Children and Families
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Grigsby
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Grigsby
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Children and Families, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-20-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1