Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 432

Notification requirements for persons who must register as sex offenders and who are on school premises and providing penalties

Topics: Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Parochial and private educational institutions, School, School: Building, Sex crimes, Voting

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, subject to certain exceptions, a person must register with the Department of Corrections (DOC) as a sex offender if he or she has been convicted of certain sex offenses, found not guilty of certain sex offenses by reason of mental disease or defect, or adjudicated delinquent on the basis of certain sex offenses. The sex offender registry contains specific information about a person required to register (registrant), such as the registrant's name, appearance, offense, address, and place of employment and any school in which the registrant is enrolled. A registrant must also periodically provide updated information to DOC if the information originally provided to the registry changes.

This bill generally prohibits a registrant from being in any school building, on any school grounds, school recreation area, or school athletic field, or on any school property owned, used, or operated for school administration unless the registrant notifies the school.

Read the full summary

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

6 representatives are its ⁠. All 6 are Republicans.

See all 6 names

Authors (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote to recommend it

Passed, 10 to 0 · Nov 24, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  3. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Jan 28, 2010

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5)(b) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  7. Jan 28, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Nov 24, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties.

  9. Nov 24, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  10. Oct 20, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Oct 15, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Oct 7, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Oct 1, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  14. Sep 30, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Sep 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  16. Sep 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Friske, Brooks, Ripp, Gunderson, Suder and Townsend

  2. Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Oct 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  10. Nov 24, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties

  11. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Withdrawn from Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties and referred to committee on Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)

  12. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5)(b) Wisconsin Statutes

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 by committee on Rules

  14. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Friske

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  17. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  23. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote