Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 438

Changes in the regulation of boxing contests, regulating mixed martial arts fighting contests, granting rule-making authority, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty

Topics: Athletics, Regulation and Licensing, Department of

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 23, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Department of Regulation and Licensing (department) regulates boxing contests conducted in the state. No club may conduct a professional boxing contest without a license from the department. Currently, only clubs that are incorporated under the laws of this state and whose members have been residents of this state for at least one year are eligible for licensure. An applicant for licensure must pay an annual fee from $25 to $300, depending on the size of the city, village, or town in which the contest is held and the price of admission.

Current law also authorizes the department to license matchmakers, managers, referees, examining physicians, and boxers in professional boxing contests. A department-appointed inspector must be present at all professional boxing contests to see that the rules are strictly observed. A licensee authorized to conduct a professional boxing contest must insure each contestant for hospital, nursing, and medication expenses and physician's services according to an equitable fee schedule. The department is required to ban a contestant who participates in a sham or fake professional boxing contest or violates any department rule, and is authorized to require the contestant to forfeit the purse for the contest.

Read the full summary

Also under current law, an amateur boxing contest (defined as a contest in which none of the contestants are compensated for participating) may be conducted in this state only if the contest is sanctioned by, and conducted under the rules of, the national governing body for amateur boxing.

This bill generally authorizes the department to regulate amateur and professional mixed martial arts fighting contests on the same terms as professional boxing contests, and to license promoters of boxing and mixed martial arts fighting contests on the same terms as clubs. The bill deletes the requirements that applicants for licensure be incorporated under the laws of this state and comprise only members who are residents of this state. The bill changes the license application fee to $200, or $500 in a city of more than 150,000 inhabitants, and changes the penalty for sham or fake contests to a forfeiture not to exceed $500. Fifty percent of forfeitures collected by the department are appropriated to the department for enforcement.

The bill also imposes a number of requirements on mixed martial arts fighting contests, including the following: A contestant in an amateur mixed martial arts fighting contest must be able to provide evidence that he or she is covered by adequate health insurance. No mixed martial arts fighting contest may be conducted without at least one licensed referee and at least four licensed judges. Contestants must be examined by a physician immediately before and after each match, and a physician and ambulance must be present during each match. The bill requires the department to promulgate rules for mixed martial arts fighting contests establishing: 1) qualifications for licensure of referees and judges; 2) requirements for regular health examinations for contestants; and 3) policies prohibiting the use of drugs and mandating drug testing of contestants.

Who's behind it

12 representatives are its ⁠. 10 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (12)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 4, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Oct 15, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Sep 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  5. Sep 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Colon, Pocan, Zepnick, Hintz, Zigmunt, Kleefisch, Vruwink, Richards, Cullen, Staskunas, Honadel and Seidel;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Lehman, Plale, Cowles, Lassa, Taylor and Sullivan

  2. Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Colon

  6. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate