Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
powersports vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and dealers and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill creates provisions governing the relationship between powersports
vehicle manufacturers and distributors, including their agents, officers, factory
representatives, and affiliates (collectively referred to as franchisors), and
powersports vehicle dealers (dealers). Under the bill, a powersports vehicle is an
all-terrain vehicle, snowmobile, lightweight utility vehicle, personal watercraft, or
off-road motorcycle. The bill imposes numerous restrictions on franchisors,
including prohibiting franchisors from doing any of the following:
1. Discriminating between dealers in certain ways, including: not offering the
same wholesale order programs to all powersports vehicle dealers; tying dealer
incentives for retail customers to placement of dealer orders; and providing for an
unfair, unreasonable, or inequitable method for the allocation, scheduling, or
delivery of new powersports vehicles, parts, or accessories to dealers.
2. Making secret payments or providing other secret compensation to dealers
if certain consequences result.
3. Giving preferential treatment to some powersports vehicle dealers over
others in the delivery of new powersports vehicles, parts, or accessories.
4. Competing with a dealer by, for more than one year, acting as a dealer or
owning, operating, or controlling a dealership in this state.
5. Taking certain actions related to the capital structure, financing, or location
of dealerships.
6. Failing to hold harmless and indemnify dealers in certain circumstances.
7. Preventing a dealer from receiving reasonable compensation for a
powersports vehicle or from freely associating with other dealers.
8. Charging dealers increased prices without specified prior notice.
9. Reimbursing anyone other than an authorized dealer for warranty service.
10. Paying less than the amount of the franchisor's suggested retail price for
parts used by dealers to perform warranty work.
11. Paying dealers an amount for labor that is less than the amount dealers
charge their retail customers for labor.
12. Requiring or coercing dealers to grant rights of first refusal or other
preferences related to purchasing dealer franchises.
13. Requiring that arbitration or legal proceedings take place outside this
state.
The bill also specifies that a franchisor may, without violating the restrictions
identified above, offer by auction powersports vehicles to all dealers and provide
certain programs to dealers.
Under the bill, a franchisor may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor
more than $1,000 for each violation of these restrictions. The Department of
Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) has jurisdiction to investigate
and enforce these restrictions, and DATCP, represented by the Department of
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 8, Noes 0
Passed 8–0 Feb 3, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Vruwink, Kaufert, Ripp, Townsend, A. Ott, Zepnick and Kestell;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Holperin, Taylor, Ellis, Cowles and Schultz
- Sep 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 1, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representatives Vruwink and J. Fitzgerald
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 5, Noes 3
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Tourism, Recreation and State Properties, Ayes 8, Noes 0
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1