Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 447

Payday loan providers, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty

Topics: Banking, Division of, Interest, Small loan

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Feb 16, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 25, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a lender other than a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or credit union generally must obtain a license from the Division of Banking in the Department of Financial Institutions (division) to assess a finance charge greater than 18 percent per year. This type of lender is generally referred to as a "licensed lender."

This bill creates certain requirements applicable to payday loan transactions.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, a "payday loan provider" is a licensed lender that makes payday loans.

A "payday loan" is a transaction between an individual with an account at a financial establishment and the payday loan provider in which the provider agrees to either:

1) accept from the individual a check, hold the check for at least three days before negotiating it, and before negotiating the check pay the individual an agreed amount; or 2) accept the individual's authorization to initiate an electronic fund transfer (EFT) from the individual's account, wait for at least three days before initiating the EFT, and before initiating the EFT pay the individual an agreed amount. The bill requires a payday loan provider, at least 15 minutes before entering into a payday loan with an applicant, to: 1) disclose to the applicant the total amount of all fees and costs, in dollars, and the annual percentage rate (APR), to be paid by the applicant assuming that the loan is paid in full at the end of the loan term; 2) provide to the applicant a copy of certain written informational materials, described below, developed by the division; and 3) disclose to the applicant that he or she has the right to rescind the payday loan transaction by the end of the business day after the loan is made. The payday loan provider must retain, for at least three years after the origination date of the payday loan, a record of compliance with these requirements.

The bill also imposes certain restrictions on payday loans. A payday loan may not accrue interest after the loan maturity date and may not include any penalty arising from the customer's default or late payment except that a payday loan provider may charge a fee not to exceed $15 if the customer's payment method is dishonored for insufficient funds. A payday loan provider may present a customer's check for payment, or initiate an EFT from the customer's account, only two times and the second time only if certain conditions are satisfied. A payday loan provider may not accept from a customer a check or authorization to initiate an EFT if the amount of the check or authorization exceeds the principal amount of the payday loan plus the finance charge on the payday loan. A payday loan provider may not rollover a payday loan unless the customer enters into a new payday loan transaction, including issuing a new check or executing a new authorization to initiate an electronic fund transfer. In addition, a customer has a right to rescind a payday loan, without incurring any fee, by returning the payday loan proceeds to the payday loan provider by the close of business on the next business day after the payday loan is made.

The bill requires the division to develop written informational materials, designed to educate, on payday loans and the payday loan industry. These informational materials must include: 1) a clear and conspicuous notice to payday loan applicants containing specified information; 2) certain aggregated information from reports submitted to the division by payday loan providers; and 3) a summary of actions that the payday loan provider may take against a payday loan customer if the customer defaults on the loan or the customer's payment method is dishonored for insufficient funds.

The bill also requires each payday loan provider to report annually to the division and pay a report filing fee. The report covers the payday loan provider's business in the preceding calendar year and must include information required by the division. The report must also contain specified information, aggregated for all customers, including: 1) the number of payday loans originated, the number of payday loans rolled over, and the average number of times a rolled-over payday loan was rolled over; 2) the average total fees and costs, and average APR, for all payday loans of the payday loan provider, categorized by loans that were not rolled over and loans that were rolled over; 3) the number of payday loans resulting in the customer's default; and 4) the number of payday loans on which the customer's payment method was dishonored for insufficient funds. The bill defines "rollover" or "rolled over" as the refinancing, renewal, amendment, or extension of a payday loan beyond its original maturity date, including the consolidation of payday loans and any transaction in which a payday loan is repaid with the proceeds of another payday loan made by the same payday loan provider.

Under the bill, a payday loan provider that violates these disclosure or reporting requirements may be required to forfeit not more than $200. The bill also requires the division to promulgate rules and prescribe forms related to the provisions of the bill.

Who's behind it

8 representatives are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 6 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 5 · Feb 10, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 41 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 72 to 24 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 24”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 41 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Failed, 43 to 54 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 43, Noes 54”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 59 to 38 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 18, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  3. Feb 18, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions.

  4. Feb 17, 2010

    “Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk” (the official wording)

  5. Feb 17, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  6. Feb 16, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 59 to 38.

  7. Feb 16, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  8. Feb 16, 2010

    “Point of order that Assembly substitute amendment 1 not germane not well taken” (the official wording)

  9. Feb 16, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  10. Feb 16, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 2-16-2010” (the official wording)

  11. Feb 10, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 10, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 5.

  13. Feb 5, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  14. Oct 7, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  15. Oct 6, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  16. Sep 25, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.

  17. Sep 25, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Jorgensen, Fields, Zepnick, Colon, Pope-Roberts, Schneider, Benedict and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senator Lehman

  2. Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions

  3. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 7, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Taylor added as a cosponsor

  6. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Fields, Hintz, Jorgensen, Seidel, Smith and Zepnick

  7. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  9. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5

  10. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 by committee on Rules

  12. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)

  13. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 2-16-2010

  14. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  15. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Davis

  16. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author

  17. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Fields, Smith, Zepnick, Seidel, Hintz and Jorgensen

  18. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  19. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Pasch, Danou, Clark, Zigmunt, Roys, Mason, Milroy, Hubler, Schneider, Vruwink, Turner, Steinbrink, Hixson, Kessler, Benedict, Grigsby, A. Williams, Pocan, Black, Hilgenberg and Berceau

  20. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41

  21. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards

  22. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 24

  23. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Gottlieb, Newcomer and Huebsch

  24. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41

  25. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly substitute amendment 1 not germane not well taken

  26. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Refused to table Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 43, Noes 54

  27. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted

  28. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 38

  31. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  33. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk

  34. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions

  35. Mar 18, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  36. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote