Assembly Bill 447
Payday loan providers, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty
Topics: Banking, Division of, Interest, Small loan
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Feb 16, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 25, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2010
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a lender other than a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, or credit union generally must obtain a license from the Division of Banking in the Department of Financial Institutions (division) to assess a finance charge greater than 18 percent per year. This type of lender is generally referred to as a "licensed lender."
This bill creates certain requirements applicable to payday loan transactions.
Read the full summary Show less
Under the bill, a "payday loan provider" is a licensed lender that makes payday loans.
A "payday loan" is a transaction between an individual with an account at a financial establishment and the payday loan provider in which the provider agrees to either:
1) accept from the individual a check, hold the check for at least three days before negotiating it, and before negotiating the check pay the individual an agreed amount; or 2) accept the individual's authorization to initiate an electronic fund transfer (EFT) from the individual's account, wait for at least three days before initiating the EFT, and before initiating the EFT pay the individual an agreed amount. The bill requires a payday loan provider, at least 15 minutes before entering into a payday loan with an applicant, to: 1) disclose to the applicant the total amount of all fees and costs, in dollars, and the annual percentage rate (APR), to be paid by the applicant assuming that the loan is paid in full at the end of the loan term; 2) provide to the applicant a copy of certain written informational materials, described below, developed by the division; and 3) disclose to the applicant that he or she has the right to rescind the payday loan transaction by the end of the business day after the loan is made. The payday loan provider must retain, for at least three years after the origination date of the payday loan, a record of compliance with these requirements.
The bill also imposes certain restrictions on payday loans. A payday loan may not accrue interest after the loan maturity date and may not include any penalty arising from the customer's default or late payment except that a payday loan provider may charge a fee not to exceed $15 if the customer's payment method is dishonored for insufficient funds. A payday loan provider may present a customer's check for payment, or initiate an EFT from the customer's account, only two times and the second time only if certain conditions are satisfied. A payday loan provider may not accept from a customer a check or authorization to initiate an EFT if the amount of the check or authorization exceeds the principal amount of the payday loan plus the finance charge on the payday loan. A payday loan provider may not rollover a payday loan unless the customer enters into a new payday loan transaction, including issuing a new check or executing a new authorization to initiate an electronic fund transfer. In addition, a customer has a right to rescind a payday loan, without incurring any fee, by returning the payday loan proceeds to the payday loan provider by the close of business on the next business day after the payday loan is made.
The bill requires the division to develop written informational materials, designed to educate, on payday loans and the payday loan industry. These informational materials must include: 1) a clear and conspicuous notice to payday loan applicants containing specified information; 2) certain aggregated information from reports submitted to the division by payday loan providers; and 3) a summary of actions that the payday loan provider may take against a payday loan customer if the customer defaults on the loan or the customer's payment method is dishonored for insufficient funds.
The bill also requires each payday loan provider to report annually to the division and pay a report filing fee. The report covers the payday loan provider's business in the preceding calendar year and must include information required by the division. The report must also contain specified information, aggregated for all customers, including: 1) the number of payday loans originated, the number of payday loans rolled over, and the average number of times a rolled-over payday loan was rolled over; 2) the average total fees and costs, and average APR, for all payday loans of the payday loan provider, categorized by loans that were not rolled over and loans that were rolled over; 3) the number of payday loans resulting in the customer's default; and 4) the number of payday loans on which the customer's payment method was dishonored for insufficient funds. The bill defines "rollover" or "rolled over" as the refinancing, renewal, amendment, or extension of a payday loan beyond its original maturity date, including the consolidation of payday loans and any transaction in which a payday loan is repaid with the proceeds of another payday loan made by the same payday loan provider.
Under the bill, a payday loan provider that violates these disclosure or reporting requirements may be required to forfeit not more than $200. The bill also requires the division to promulgate rules and prescribe forms related to the provisions of the bill.
Who's behind it
8 representatives are its . All 8 are Democrats.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Pedro Colon · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 6 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 5 · Feb 10, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 56 to 41 · Feb 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 72 to 24 · Feb 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 24”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 56 to 41 · Feb 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Failed, 43 to 54 · Feb 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Refused to table Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 43, Noes 54”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 59 to 38 · Feb 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 38”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 18, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 18, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions.
-
Feb 17, 2010
“Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk” (the official wording)
-
Feb 17, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 16, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 59 to 38.
-
Feb 16, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 16, 2010
“Point of order that Assembly substitute amendment 1 not germane not well taken” (the official wording)
-
Feb 16, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 16, 2010
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 2-16-2010” (the official wording)
-
Feb 10, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 10, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 6 to 5.
-
Feb 5, 2010
1 more senator signed on in support.
-
Oct 7, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 6, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 25, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Financial Institutions.
-
Sep 25, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Jorgensen, Fields, Zepnick, Colon, Pope-Roberts, Schneider, Benedict and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senator Lehman
- Sep 25, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 7, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Senator Taylor added as a cosponsor
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Fields, Hintz, Jorgensen, Seidel, Smith and Zepnick
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Financial Institutions, Ayes 6, Noes 5
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly substitute amendment 1)
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 2-16-2010
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Davis
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 withdrawn and returned to author
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Fields, Smith, Zepnick, Seidel, Hintz and Jorgensen
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Pasch, Danou, Clark, Zigmunt, Roys, Mason, Milroy, Hubler, Schneider, Vruwink, Turner, Steinbrink, Hixson, Kessler, Benedict, Grigsby, A. Williams, Pocan, Black, Hilgenberg and Berceau
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Richards
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 72, Noes 24
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representatives Gottlieb, Newcomer and Huebsch
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 41
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly substitute amendment 1 not germane not well taken
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Refused to table Assembly substitute amendment 1, Ayes 43, Noes 54
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 59, Noes 38
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Veterans and Military Affairs, Biotechnology, and Financial Institutions
- Mar 18, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote