Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 458

Providing instruction in human growth and development

Topics: Children: Protection and services, Family, Guardian and ward, Marriage, Nurses, Physician, School: Board, School: Health program, Sex crimes, State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Became law

The governor signed it on Feb 24, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Sep 30, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Nov 3, 2009

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 33 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 134

Latest entry in the official record, Feb 26, 2010: “Published 3-10-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a school board may provide an instructional program in human growth and development in grades kindergarten to 12 that may include instruction in the following areas: 1) self-esteem, responsible decision making, and personal responsibility; 2) interpersonal relationships; 3) discouragement of adolescent sexual activity; and 4) family life and skills required of a parent. The school board may also provide instruction in human sexuality, reproduction, family planning, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), prenatal development, childbirth, adoption, available prenatal and postnatal support, and male and female responsibility. If a school board offers instruction in any of these areas, it must also provide instruction in marriage and parental responsibility.

If a school district offers a human growth and development curriculum, the school board must appoint an advisory committee composed of parents, teachers, school administrators, pupils, health care professionals, members of the clergy, and other residents of the school district to assist the school board with the development, review, and implementation of the human growth and development curriculum. The advisory committee must also review the school district's curriculum at least every three years. Upon the written request of the pupil's parent or guardian, a pupil shall be exempted from the requirement to complete instruction in human growth and development.

Read the full summary

Under current law, a volunteer health care provider (provider) may apply to the Department of Administration to be permitted to provide health care services without charge in a school or nonprofit agency. If the provider wishes to provide services at a school, the provider must file the application jointly with the school board or, if the school is a charter school, the governing body of the school. "Volunteer health care provider" is defined under current law as a physician, dentist or dental hygienist, registered nurse, practical nurse, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, optometrist, physician assistant, or dietitian who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession or who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession when providing services at the school. Under current law, the provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the requirements above, but may not provide instruction in human sexuality; reproduction; family planning, including natural family planning; HIV and AIDS; prenatal development; childbirth; adoption;

available prenatal and postnatal support; and male and female responsibility.

This bill provides that a school board may offer an instructional program in human growth and development. If the school board offers an instructional program in human growth and development, the bill requires that the program provide medically accurate information and, when age appropriate, address all of the following: 1) communication between the pupil and the pupil's parents or guardians about sexuality; 2) reproductive and sexual anatomy and physiology; 3) puberty, pregnancy, parenting, body image, and gender stereotypes; 4) skills to make responsible decisions about sexuality and sexual behavior throughout the pupil's life span; 5) the benefits of and reasons for abstaining from sexual activity; 6) the health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections; 7) methods for developing healthy life skills, including setting goals, responsible decision making, communication, and stress management; 8) how alcohol or drug use affects responsible decision making; and 9) the impact of media and peer messages on thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to sexuality. In addition, the program must do all of the following: 1) use instructional methods and materials that do not promote bias against pupils of any race, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnic or cultural background or against sexually active pupils or children with disabilities; 2) promote self-esteem and positive interpersonal skills, with an emphasis on healthy relationships; and 3) identify counseling, medical, and legal resources for survivors of sexual abuse and assault, including resources for escaping violent relationships.

The bill defines medically accurate information as information that satisfies all of the following: 1) the information is supported by the weight of research conducted in compliance with accepted scientific methods; 2) where appropriate, the information is published in peer-reviewed journals; and 3) the information is recognized as accurate by relevant leading professional organizations or agencies, such as the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, or the American Academy of Pediatrics. The bill defines "age appropriate" as suitable to a particular age group of pupils based on the developing cognitive and emotional capacity of and behaviors typical for the age group.

The bill permits a school district to eliminate from the human sexuality and development curriculum information that is not age appropriate. The bill requires each school board that elects not to offer human growth and development instruction to notify each pupil's parent or guardian of this fact. The bill also requires the state superintendent to apply for federal funds to implement an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program.

Finally, the bill permits a provider to provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the instructional program established in this bill.

Who's behind it

26 lawmakers are its ⁠. 25 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 34 names

Authors (26)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 16 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 52 to 41 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 51 to 40 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 40”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 51 to 42 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 42”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 48 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 43, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 3 · Jan 27, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 33 to 0 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote on an amendment

Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote

Passed, 51 to 45 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Feb 26, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Feb 24, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 134.

  3. Feb 23, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2010

    “Action messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)

  5. Jan 28, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Jan 28, 2010

    “Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45” (the official wording)

  7. Jan 28, 2010

    The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.

  8. Jan 28, 2010

    The Senate adopted it, 33 to 0.

  9. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.

  10. Jan 26, 2010

    “Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk” (the official wording)

  11. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.

  12. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  13. Jan 19, 2010

    “Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)

  14. Nov 5, 2009

    The Assembly passed it, 48 to 43.

  15. Nov 3, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  16. Nov 3, 2009

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-3-2009” (the official wording)

  17. Nov 3, 2009

    “Point of order that Assembly amendment 8 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)

  18. Nov 3, 2009

    “Point of order that Assembly amendment 6 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)

  19. Nov 3, 2009

    The Assembly adopted it.

  20. Oct 29, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  21. Oct 29, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 5.

  22. Oct 29, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  23. Oct 8, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  24. Oct 6, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  25. Oct 5, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  26. Sep 30, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  27. Sep 30, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Grigsby, Roys, Shilling, Berceau, Black, Kessler, Pasch, Fields, Vruwink, Turner, Soletski, Benedict, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Seidel, Danou, Pocan, Sinicki, Hintz, Smith, Bernard Schaber, Dexter, Hraychuck, Molepske Jr., Zepnick and Toles;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Lehman, Sullivan, Plale, Miller, Risser, Robson and Erpenbach

  2. Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Oct 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Grigsby

  7. Oct 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Grigsby

  8. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  10. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  11. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  12. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 5

  13. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-3-2009 by committee on Rules

  15. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  16. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  17. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  18. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Gottlieb and Ballweg

  19. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 adopted

  20. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Ballweg

  21. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 41

  22. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Ballweg

  23. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  24. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative LeMahieu

  25. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 6 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken

  26. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  27. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 40

  28. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representatives Vukmir, Davis and Ballweg

  29. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  30. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative LeMahieu

  31. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Point of order that Assembly amendment 8 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken

  32. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair appealed

  33. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 42

  34. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-3-2009

  35. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representative Strachota

  36. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43

  37. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 offered by Representative LeMahieu

  38. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44

  39. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representative Ballweg

  40. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 11 adopted

  41. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  42. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 43, Paired 4

  43. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  44. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  45. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  46. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk

  47. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  48. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  49. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  50. Jan 27, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization

  51. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  52. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senators Grothman and Taylor

  53. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 33, Noes 0

  54. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Olsen

  55. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  56. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 offered by Senators Grothman and Lazich

  57. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  58. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Hopper, Lazich, Darling, Grothman and Olsen

  59. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 4 rejected

  60. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 offered by Senators Lazich and Grothman

  61. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  62. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Leibham, Lazich, Kapanke, Kanavas, Grothman, S. Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Cowles and Kedzie

  63. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 6 rejected

  64. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  65. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  66. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 18, Noes 15

  67. Jan 28, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  68. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45

  69. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)

  70. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 95, Noes 0

  71. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Senate amendment 6)

  72. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Action messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)

  73. Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  74. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 2-23-2010

  75. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 2-24-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 134

  76. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 3-10-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote