Assembly Bill 458
Providing instruction in human growth and development
Topics: Children: Protection and services, Family, Guardian and ward, Marriage, Nurses, Physician, School: Board, School: Health program, Sex crimes, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Became law
The governor signed it on Feb 24, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Sep 30, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Nov 3, 2009
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed 33 to 0
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 134
Latest entry in the official record, Feb 26, 2010: “Published 3-10-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a school board may provide an instructional program in human growth and development in grades kindergarten to 12 that may include instruction in the following areas: 1) self-esteem, responsible decision making, and personal responsibility; 2) interpersonal relationships; 3) discouragement of adolescent sexual activity; and 4) family life and skills required of a parent. The school board may also provide instruction in human sexuality, reproduction, family planning, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), prenatal development, childbirth, adoption, available prenatal and postnatal support, and male and female responsibility. If a school board offers instruction in any of these areas, it must also provide instruction in marriage and parental responsibility.
If a school district offers a human growth and development curriculum, the school board must appoint an advisory committee composed of parents, teachers, school administrators, pupils, health care professionals, members of the clergy, and other residents of the school district to assist the school board with the development, review, and implementation of the human growth and development curriculum. The advisory committee must also review the school district's curriculum at least every three years. Upon the written request of the pupil's parent or guardian, a pupil shall be exempted from the requirement to complete instruction in human growth and development.
Read the full summary Show less
Under current law, a volunteer health care provider (provider) may apply to the Department of Administration to be permitted to provide health care services without charge in a school or nonprofit agency. If the provider wishes to provide services at a school, the provider must file the application jointly with the school board or, if the school is a charter school, the governing body of the school. "Volunteer health care provider" is defined under current law as a physician, dentist or dental hygienist, registered nurse, practical nurse, nurse-midwife, nurse practitioner, optometrist, physician assistant, or dietitian who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession or who receives no income from the practice of that health care profession when providing services at the school. Under current law, the provider may provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the requirements above, but may not provide instruction in human sexuality; reproduction; family planning, including natural family planning; HIV and AIDS; prenatal development; childbirth; adoption;
available prenatal and postnatal support; and male and female responsibility.
This bill provides that a school board may offer an instructional program in human growth and development. If the school board offers an instructional program in human growth and development, the bill requires that the program provide medically accurate information and, when age appropriate, address all of the following: 1) communication between the pupil and the pupil's parents or guardians about sexuality; 2) reproductive and sexual anatomy and physiology; 3) puberty, pregnancy, parenting, body image, and gender stereotypes; 4) skills to make responsible decisions about sexuality and sexual behavior throughout the pupil's life span; 5) the benefits of and reasons for abstaining from sexual activity; 6) the health benefits, side effects, and proper use of contraceptives and barrier methods approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prevent pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections; 7) methods for developing healthy life skills, including setting goals, responsible decision making, communication, and stress management; 8) how alcohol or drug use affects responsible decision making; and 9) the impact of media and peer messages on thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to sexuality. In addition, the program must do all of the following: 1) use instructional methods and materials that do not promote bias against pupils of any race, gender, sexual orientation, or ethnic or cultural background or against sexually active pupils or children with disabilities; 2) promote self-esteem and positive interpersonal skills, with an emphasis on healthy relationships; and 3) identify counseling, medical, and legal resources for survivors of sexual abuse and assault, including resources for escaping violent relationships.
The bill defines medically accurate information as information that satisfies all of the following: 1) the information is supported by the weight of research conducted in compliance with accepted scientific methods; 2) where appropriate, the information is published in peer-reviewed journals; and 3) the information is recognized as accurate by relevant leading professional organizations or agencies, such as the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, or the American Academy of Pediatrics. The bill defines "age appropriate" as suitable to a particular age group of pupils based on the developing cognitive and emotional capacity of and behaviors typical for the age group.
The bill permits a school district to eliminate from the human sexuality and development curriculum information that is not age appropriate. The bill requires each school board that elects not to offer human growth and development instruction to notify each pupil's parent or guardian of this fact. The bill also requires the state superintendent to apply for federal funds to implement an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program.
Finally, the bill permits a provider to provide instruction in human growth and development if the instructional program complies with the instructional program established in this bill.
Who's behind it
26 lawmakers are its . 25 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.
8 more lawmakers .
See all 34 names Hide the names
Authors (26)
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Penny Bernard Schaber · Democrat, Assembly
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Kristen Dexter · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Gordon Hintz · Democrat, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Louis Molepske Jr. · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Donna Seidel · Democrat, Assembly
- Shilling
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- James Soletski · Democrat, Assembly
- Barbara Toles · Democrat, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (8)
- Jon Erpenbach · Democrat, Senate
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Jeffrey Plale · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
- Amendment AA1-AB458
- Amendment AA2-AB458
- Amendment AA3-AB458
- Amendment AA4-AB458
- Amendment AA5-AB458
- Amendment AA6-AB458
- Amendment AA7-AB458
- Amendment AA8-AB458
- Amendment AA9-AB458
- Amendment AA10-AB458
- Amendment AA11-AB458
- Amendment SA1-AB458
- Amendment SA2-AB458
- Amendment SA3-AB458
- Amendment SA4-AB458
- Amendment SA5-AB458
- Amendment SA6-AB458
- LC Amendment Memo
How lawmakers voted
There were 16 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Education vote on an amendment
Passed, 13 to 0 · Oct 29, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 49 to 44 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 52 to 41 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 41”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 50 to 43 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Passed, 51 to 40 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 40”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Passed, 51 to 42 · Nov 3, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 42”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 48 to 43 · Nov 5, 2009
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 43, Paired 4”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Education vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 3 · Jan 27, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 33 to 0 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 33, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote on an amendment
Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Senate amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote
Passed, 51 to 45 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate vote to pass it
Passed, 18 to 15 · Jan 28, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 18, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Feb 26, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 134.
-
Feb 23, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Feb 16, 2010
“Action messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Jan 28, 2010
“Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45” (the official wording)
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate passed it too, 18 to 15.
-
Jan 28, 2010
The Senate adopted it, 33 to 0.
-
Jan 27, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.
-
Jan 26, 2010
“Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk” (the official wording)
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Education.
-
Jan 19, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Jan 19, 2010
“Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)” (the official wording)
-
Nov 5, 2009
The Assembly passed it, 48 to 43.
-
Nov 3, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Nov 3, 2009
“Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-3-2009” (the official wording)
-
Nov 3, 2009
“Point of order that Assembly amendment 8 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)
-
Nov 3, 2009
“Point of order that Assembly amendment 6 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken” (the official wording)
-
Nov 3, 2009
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Oct 29, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Oct 29, 2009
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 5.
-
Oct 29, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 8, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Oct 6, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 5, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Sep 30, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.
-
Sep 30, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Grigsby, Roys, Shilling, Berceau, Black, Kessler, Pasch, Fields, Vruwink, Turner, Soletski, Benedict, Pope-Roberts, Richards, Seidel, Danou, Pocan, Sinicki, Hintz, Smith, Bernard Schaber, Dexter, Hraychuck, Molepske Jr., Zepnick and Toles;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Lehman, Sullivan, Plale, Miller, Risser, Robson and Erpenbach
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Oct 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 8, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 12, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Grigsby
- Oct 26, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Grigsby
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 13, Noes 0
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 8, Noes 5
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-3-2009 by committee on Rules
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Gottlieb and Ballweg
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 adopted
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Ballweg
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 laid on table, Ayes 52, Noes 41
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Ballweg
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative LeMahieu
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 6 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair appealed
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 40
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representatives Vukmir, Davis and Ballweg
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 7 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 8 offered by Representative LeMahieu
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Point of order that Assembly amendment 8 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 well taken
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair appealed
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 51, Noes 42
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-3-2009
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 offered by Representative Strachota
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 9 laid on table, Ayes 50, Noes 43
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 10 offered by Representative LeMahieu
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 10 laid on table, Ayes 49, Noes 44
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 11 offered by Representative Ballweg
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 11 adopted
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 48, Noes 43, Paired 4
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)
- Jan 19, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Jan 22, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Education
- Jan 26, 2010 · Senate
Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Jan 27, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Senate Organization
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 1 adopted, Ayes 33, Noes 0
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 offered by Senator Olsen
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 2 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 3 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 offered by Senators Hopper, Lazich, Darling, Grothman and Olsen
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 4 rejected
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 5 rejected, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 offered by Senators Leibham, Lazich, Kapanke, Kanavas, Grothman, S. Fitzgerald, A. Lasee, Cowles and Kedzie
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Senate amendment 6 rejected
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in as amended, Ayes 18, Noes 15
- Jan 28, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Moved to take up from Senate Message, Ayes 51, Noes 45
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate amended and concurred in as amended (Senate amendment 1 adopted)
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Senate amendment 1 concurred in, Ayes 95, Noes 0
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction (Senate amendment 6)
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Action messaged pursuant to Assembly Rule 50 (1)
- Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 2-23-2010
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 2-24-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 134
- Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly
Published 3-10-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote