Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 467

Creating an optional holiday for state employees to observe the birthday of Cesar E. Chavez

Topics: Holidays and special dates, Labor, Public employee: Vacations, State agencies

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 20, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 6, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 51 to 47

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires all state agencies to designate March 31 as "Cesar E. Chavez Day" in observance of the birthday of Cesar E. Chavez. Under the bill, if March 31 falls on a day on which the offices of a state agency are open, the appointing authority of the state agency is required to permit any employee of the state agency to receive that day as a paid holiday in lieu of receiving a paid holiday on one of the other paid holidays provided to state employees. The bill also provides that the appointing authority may permit an employee to receive March 31 as a paid holiday only if the operations of the state agency are maintained at least at a minimum level. The bill's provisions apply to nonrepresented state employees and will only apply to represented state employees if so provided in applicable collective bargaining agreements.

Who's behind it

15 lawmakers are its ⁠. 14 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 19 names

Authors (15)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 3 · Jan 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 5, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 51 to 47 · Apr 20, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 47”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 21, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations.

  3. Apr 21, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 20, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 51 to 47.

  5. Jan 12, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  6. Jan 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 3.

  7. Dec 3, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Oct 30, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Oct 6, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security.

  10. Oct 6, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Colon, Sherman, Zepnick, Black, Young, Roys, Hilgenberg, Turner, Berceau, Pocan, Sinicki, Mason, Kessler, Grigsby and Danou;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Coggs, Taylor and Hansen

  2. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security

  3. Oct 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  7. Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:06 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  9. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  10. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  11. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  12. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 51, Noes 47

  13. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  14. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote