Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 468

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

municipal court fees.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, when a municipal courts finds that a person has violated an

ordinance, the municipal court judge may collect a court fee of not less than $15 nor

more than $28 from the person. Of that fee, the municipal treasurer forwards $5 to

the Department of Administration and retains the balance for use by the

municipality.

This bill increases the maximum court fee to $38.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Parisi (D) , Richards (D)

4 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Hopper (R) , Lehman (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 16, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2

Passed 14–2 Mar 17, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Parisi, Richards and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Hopper, Lehman and Erpenbach

  2. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Oct 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  8. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 14, Noes 2

  10. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:08 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  19. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  23. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Fiscal estimate received