Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 480

Creating a civil cause of action for acts of violence motivated by gender

Topics: Court: Procedure, Damage (personal injury), Discrimination

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Mar 4, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 6, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 4, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill creates a civil cause of action for a person who suffers physical, emotional, or economic harm as a result of a gender-based act. Under the bill, a gender-based act is an act that is committed, at least in part, on the basis of the victim's gender or a physical intrusion that is sexual in nature and that the actor commits under coercive conditions.

Under the bill, a victim must commence a civil action against the actor within seven years after the gender-based act occurs or, if the victim is under the age of 18, within seven years after the victim's 18th birthday. A victim who prevails in a civil action for a gender-based act may recover damages for emotional distress, punitive damages, and investigation or litigation costs, including attorney fees.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 9 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (3)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 5 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 4 to 1 · Mar 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 19, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 1.

  3. Mar 8, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  4. Mar 5, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  5. Mar 4, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  6. Mar 4, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  7. Feb 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 16, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 2.

  9. Jan 21, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  10. Oct 6, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

  11. Oct 6, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Berceau, Roys, Black, Sinicki, Dexter, Grigsby, Pasch, Toles and Parisi;Cosponsored by Senators Coggs, Hansen and Taylor

  2. Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Berceau

  4. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Kessler

  6. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Gundrum

  7. Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Berceau

  8. Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Van Roy and Berceau

  9. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Berceau

  10. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 5 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  12. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 8, Noes 2

  13. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  14. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules

  15. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representative Berceau

  16. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 adopted

  18. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 adopted

  19. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Refused to indefinitely postpone

  21. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  23. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  25. Mar 8, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  26. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  27. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  28. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  29. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote