Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
making crimes based on gender of victim subject to a penalty enhancer and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law provides an enhanced penalty for certain crimes if the person
committing the crime intentionally selects the victim based on his or her belief or
perception of the victim's race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national
origin, or ancestry. This bill provides an enhanced penalty for certain crimes if the
person committing the crime intentionally selects the victim based on his or her
belief or perception of the victim's gender. The penalty enhancer revises the
maximum fine and the maximum term of imprisonment for the crime, and the
revision is based on the classification of the underlying crime. If the underlying
crime is a Class B or Class C misdemeanor, the revised maximum fine is $10,000 and
the revised maximum term of imprisonment is one year in the county jail. If the
underlying crime is a Class A misdemeanor, the penalty enhancer changes the status
of the crime to a felony and the revised maximum fine is $10,000 and the revised
maximum term of imprisonment is two years. If the underlying crime is a felony, the
maximum fine may be increased by not more than $5,000 and the maximum term
of imprisonment may be increased by not more than five years.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 8, Noes 2
Passed 8–2 Feb 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Mar 19, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Parisi, Pasch, Roys, Black, Berceau, Turner, Shilling, Dexter, Grigsby, Smith and Vruwink;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Vinehout
- Oct 6, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 8, Noes 2
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 19, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1