Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
various changes in the unemployment insurance law and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes various changes in the unemployment insurance (UI) law.
Significant provisions include:
Benefit changes
Disqualification for full-time work
Currently, if a claimant receives wages or certain other amounts treated as
wages from an employer who paid at least 80 percent of the claimant's wages in his
or her base period (period preceding a claim during which benefit rights accrue) for
any week, the claimant is not eligible to receive benefits for that week if the claimant
works for at least 35 hours for that employer in that week and receives pay at not less
than the rate of pay that the claimant received during the calendar quarter in his or
her base period in which the claimant received his or her highest wages, or the
claimant receives certain other payments from that employer for that week that
alone or in combination with any paid wages equal at least the pay the claimant
would have received for 35 hours of work.
This bill provides that a claimant is subject to this disqualifier for any week if
the claimant receives wages or certain other amounts treated as wages from such an
employer for full-time work for that week. The bill defines "full-time work" as work
performed for 32 or more hours per week.
Voluntary termination of work
Currently, if an employee voluntarily terminates his or her work with an
employer, the employee is generally ineligible to receive benefits until four weeks
have elapsed since the end of the week in which the termination occurs and the
employee earns wages after the week in which the termination occurs equal to at
least four times the employee's weekly benefit rate in employment covered by the
unemployment insurance law of any state or the federal government. However, an
employee may terminate his or her work and receive benefits without requalifying
under this provision if the employee terminates his or her work with good cause
attributable to his or her employer. In addition, an employee may voluntarily
terminate his or her work and receive benefits without requalifying under this
provision if: a) the work is part-time work consisting of not more than 30 hours per
week and the employee is otherwise eligible to receive benefits because of the loss of
the employee's full-time work and the loss of the full-time work makes it
economically unfeasible to continue his or her part-time work; or b) the employee
terminates his or her work in one of two or more concurrently held positions at least
one of which consists of more than 30 hours per week, if the employee terminates his
or her work before receiving notice of termination from a position which consists of
more than 30 hours per week.
This bill changes the above exceptions so that an employee may receive benefits
without requalifying if, under a), the work from which the employee terminates is
part-time work; or, under b), the work from which the employee terminates is
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Oct 27, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Sinicki, by request of Department of Workforce Development;Cosponsored by Senator Coggs
- Oct 9, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Sinicki
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 10-29-2009 by committee on Rules
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Oct 29, 2009 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Nov 3, 2009 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1