Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 502

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

requiring the Department of Revenue to certify the tax base of Tax Incremental Financing District Number 18 in the city of Waukesha.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and plans are

required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed TID within

specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning commission

of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project plan by the

common council or village board, and adoption of a resolution by the common council

or village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax increment base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works, such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended.

Currently, before a TID may be created, the city or village's application must

contain findings that at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is

blighted, in need of rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or

suitable for mixed-use development. The findings, in effect, determine the type of

TID that is being created.

With regard to TID Number 18, which the city of Waukesha created, or

attempted to create on January 1, 2008, based on action taken by the common council

on July 16, 2008, this bill requires that DOR proceed as if the TID was created on

January 1, 2008, notwithstanding the fact that the city's findings did not specify the

type of TID that was being created. Also under the bill, DOR may not certify a value

increment before 2010.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Kramer (R) , Newcomer (R)

1 cosponsors

Kanavas (R)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Jan 22, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Kramer and Newcomer;Cosponsored by Senator Kanavas

  2. Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means

  3. Nov 6, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Knodl

  5. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  8. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  9. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to Calendar

  10. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  11. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jan 26, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Jan 29, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  18. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1