Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
the Department of Revenue's interpretation of the law.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under this bill, the Department of Revenue may not change its interpretation
of any statute or administrative rule in order to increase state tax revenue unless the
change is required by a change to the statute or administrative rule made by the Tax
Appeals Commission, the courts, or the legislature.
Sponsors
Introduced by: Ballweg (R) , Davis (R) , Gunderson (R) , Gundrum (R) , Huebsch (R) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kestell (R) , Knodl (R) , Kramer (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Lothian (R) , Montgomery (R) , Mursau (R) , Murtha (R) , Nerison (R) , Newcomer (R) , Nygren (R) , Petersen (R) , Pridemore (R) , Ripp (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Suder (R) , Tauchen (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Zipperer (R)
Full history
- Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Zipperer, Nygren, Ballweg, Davis, Gunderson, Gundrum, Huebsch, Kaufert, Kerkman, Kestell, Knodl, Kramer, LeMahieu, Lothian, Montgomery, Mursau, Murtha, Nerison, Newcomer, Petersen, Pridemore, Ripp, Spanbauer, Suder, Tauchen, Vos and Van Roy;Cosponsored by Senators Kanavas, Leibham, Darling, Grothman, Lazich and Schultz
- Oct 15, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Ways and Means
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Ways and Means and referred to committee on Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1