Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 509

Exempting certain capital expenditures made by a technical college district from the requirement for a referendum

Topics: Referendum, Technical college

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Jan 19, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 20, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed 64 to 31

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if a technical college district board intends to make a capital expenditure in excess of $1,500,000 for the purchase or construction of buildings or for the lease/purchase of buildings (if costs exceed $1,500,000 for the lifetime of the lease), it must adopt a resolution stating its intention and submit the resolution to the electors of the district for approval.

This bill provides that in determining whether this referendum requirement applies to a capital expenditure partially funded with student housing payments for the purchase or construction, or the lease/purchase, of a student residence facility, that portion of the capital expenditure consisting of student housing payments is subtracted.

Who's behind it

11 lawmakers are its ⁠. 7 are Democrats and 3 are Republicans. 1 has no party on record.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 15 names

Authors (11)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 3 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 9, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 56 to 40 · Jan 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 40”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 64 to 31 · Jan 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 64, Noes 31, Paired 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Small Business vote to recommend it

Passed, 3 to 2 · Feb 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 3 to 2.

  3. Feb 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Feb 1, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection.

  6. Jan 19, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  7. Jan 19, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 64 to 31.

  8. Nov 3, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Nov 3, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 3.

  10. Oct 26, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Oct 21, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Oct 21, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  13. Oct 20, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  14. Oct 20, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Shilling, Danou, Huebsch, Hixson, Soletski, Nerison, Mason, Brooks, Toles, Molepske Jr. and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor and Vinehout

  2. Oct 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Kreitlow added as a cosponsor

  4. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Oct 26, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Oct 28, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 9, Noes 3

  8. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Jan 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-19-2010 by committee on Rules

  10. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Krusick and Stone

  12. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 56, Noes 40

  13. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  15. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 64, Noes 31, Paired 2

  16. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  17. Jan 19, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  18. Jan 22, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection

  19. Feb 1, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Holperin added as a cosponsor

  20. Feb 3, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Small Business, Emergency Preparedness, Technical Colleges, and Consumer Protection, Ayes 3, Noes 2

  23. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote