Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 514

Time limitations for commencing prosecution of crimes

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals: Felony, Crime and criminals: Homicide or murder, Evidence, Genetics and genetic testing, Limitation of action, Sex crimes, Statutes: Revision

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 23, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 203

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Extending time period for commencing prosecution of certain offenses when DNA evidence is available Under current law, the state generally must commence prosecution of a felony within six years of the offense and a misdemeanor within three years of the offense and if it does not, prosecution is barred. However, the following exceptions to this general rule apply: 1) there is no time limitation for commencing prosecution of first-degree or second-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, felony murder, or certain sexual assaults of a child; 2) prosecution of second-degree reckless homicide may be commenced within 15 years of the offense; 3) prosecution of certain sexual, enticement, abuse, or trafficking offenses against a child are extended until the victim of the offense reaches either age 24, 26, or 45, depending on the offense; and 4) if the state collects deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence in connection with certain sexual assaults or sexual assaults of a child before the applicable time period for commencing prosecution of the assault expires, but cannot match the DNA evidence with a known person until after the time period for commencing prosecution of the assault expires, the time period for commencing prosecution of the person who is the source of the DNA for the assault is extended.

In addition, the time period for commencing prosecution of crimes that are related to the assault may be extended as well. Crimes are related if they are committed against the same victim, are proximate in time, and are committed with the same intent, purpose, or opportunity so as to be part of the same course of conduct.

Read the full summary

The specific provisions for extending the time for commencing prosecution in cases in which the state collects DNA evidence are as follows:

1. First degree sexual assault: Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 276 , if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault at any time after making a DNA match. Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 60 , the state may also commence prosecution for a crime that is related to the first-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match.

2. Second-degree sexual assault: Under 2005 Wisconsin Acts 60 and 276 , if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match. Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 60 , the state may also commence prosecution of a crime that is related to the second-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match.

3. Sexual assault of a child: Under current law, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault of a child or a Class C felony repeated sexual assault of the same child (second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child), the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child, or a crime that is related to the second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child, within 12 months after making the DNA match. Additionally, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first- degree or second- degree sexual assault of a child or a Class A, B, or C felony repeated sexual assault of the same child before the time for commencing prosecution of a crime that is related to the sexual assault or repeated sexual assault of a child expires, the state may commence prosecution of the related crime within 12 months after making a DNA match.

This bill extends application of the DNA evidence exception to time limits for commencing prosecution. Under the bill, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a crime against life or bodily security or a crime against children before the time for commencing prosecution of the felony expires, the state may commence prosecution of the felony, or a crime that is related to the felony, within 12 months after making a DNA match. In addition, the bill provides that if the state collects DNA evidence of a crime for which there is no time limit for commencing prosecution (first-degree or second-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, felony murder, or certain sexual assaults of a child) within six years after commission of that crime, the state may commence prosecution of a crime that is related to that crime, within 12 months after making a DNA match.

The bill reconciles 2005 Wisconsin Acts 60 and 276 by providing that: 1) if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault at any time after making a DNA match, and may commence prosecution of a crime that is related to the first-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match; and 2) that if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault, the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault, or a crime that is related to the second-degree sexual assault, within 12 months after making a DNA match.

Who's behind it

17 lawmakers are its ⁠. 10 are Democrats, 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 22 names

Authors (17)

Signed on in support (5)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 12, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 95 to 0 · Feb 23, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 27, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 22, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 203.

  3. Apr 20, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 24, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 26, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  8. Feb 24, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 23, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 95 to 0.

  10. Feb 23, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 12, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 12, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  13. Nov 12, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Oct 23, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  15. Oct 23, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Jorgensen, Parisi, Kerkman, Suder, Wood, Turner, Roys, Cullen, Gunderson, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, A. Ott, Knodl, Hraychuck and Ballweg;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, A. Lasee, Olsen, Coggs and Kedzie

  2. Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas

  5. Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  7. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  8. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 by committee on Rules

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  12. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  16. Feb 24, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  17. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  18. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  19. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  20. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  21. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  22. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  26. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  27. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010

  31. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 203

  32. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-5-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote