Assembly Bill 514
Time limitations for commencing prosecution of crimes
Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals: Felony, Crime and criminals: Homicide or murder, Evidence, Genetics and genetic testing, Limitation of action, Sex crimes, Statutes: Revision
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 23, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 23, 2010
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 203
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Extending time period for commencing prosecution of certain offenses when DNA evidence is available Under current law, the state generally must commence prosecution of a felony within six years of the offense and a misdemeanor within three years of the offense and if it does not, prosecution is barred. However, the following exceptions to this general rule apply: 1) there is no time limitation for commencing prosecution of first-degree or second-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, felony murder, or certain sexual assaults of a child; 2) prosecution of second-degree reckless homicide may be commenced within 15 years of the offense; 3) prosecution of certain sexual, enticement, abuse, or trafficking offenses against a child are extended until the victim of the offense reaches either age 24, 26, or 45, depending on the offense; and 4) if the state collects deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence in connection with certain sexual assaults or sexual assaults of a child before the applicable time period for commencing prosecution of the assault expires, but cannot match the DNA evidence with a known person until after the time period for commencing prosecution of the assault expires, the time period for commencing prosecution of the person who is the source of the DNA for the assault is extended.
In addition, the time period for commencing prosecution of crimes that are related to the assault may be extended as well. Crimes are related if they are committed against the same victim, are proximate in time, and are committed with the same intent, purpose, or opportunity so as to be part of the same course of conduct.
Read the full summary Show less
The specific provisions for extending the time for commencing prosecution in cases in which the state collects DNA evidence are as follows:
1. First degree sexual assault: Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 276 , if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault at any time after making a DNA match. Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 60 , the state may also commence prosecution for a crime that is related to the first-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match.
2. Second-degree sexual assault: Under 2005 Wisconsin Acts 60 and 276 , if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match. Under 2005 Wisconsin Act 60 , the state may also commence prosecution of a crime that is related to the second-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match.
3. Sexual assault of a child: Under current law, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault of a child or a Class C felony repeated sexual assault of the same child (second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child), the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child, or a crime that is related to the second-degree or Class C felony sexual assault of a child, within 12 months after making the DNA match. Additionally, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first- degree or second- degree sexual assault of a child or a Class A, B, or C felony repeated sexual assault of the same child before the time for commencing prosecution of a crime that is related to the sexual assault or repeated sexual assault of a child expires, the state may commence prosecution of the related crime within 12 months after making a DNA match.
This bill extends application of the DNA evidence exception to time limits for commencing prosecution. Under the bill, if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a crime against life or bodily security or a crime against children before the time for commencing prosecution of the felony expires, the state may commence prosecution of the felony, or a crime that is related to the felony, within 12 months after making a DNA match. In addition, the bill provides that if the state collects DNA evidence of a crime for which there is no time limit for commencing prosecution (first-degree or second-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide, felony murder, or certain sexual assaults of a child) within six years after commission of that crime, the state may commence prosecution of a crime that is related to that crime, within 12 months after making a DNA match.
The bill reconciles 2005 Wisconsin Acts 60 and 276 by providing that: 1) if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a first-degree sexual assault before the time for commencing prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault expires, the state may commence prosecution of the first-degree sexual assault at any time after making a DNA match, and may commence prosecution of a crime that is related to the first-degree sexual assault within 12 months after making a DNA match; and 2) that if the state collects DNA evidence in connection with a second-degree sexual assault, the state may commence prosecution of the second-degree sexual assault, or a crime that is related to the second-degree sexual assault, within 12 months after making a DNA match.
Who's behind it
17 lawmakers are its . 10 are Democrats, 6 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.
5 more lawmakers .
See all 22 names Hide the names
Authors (17)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Scott Gunderson · Republican, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Samantha Kerkman · Republican, Assembly
- Dan Knodl · Republican, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Tony Staskunas · Democrat, Assembly
- Scott Suder · Republican, Assembly
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeffrey Wood · Independent, Assembly
Signed on in support (5)
- Alan Lasee · Republican, Senate
- Spencer Coggs · Democrat, Senate
- Neal Kedzie · Republican, Senate
- Luther S. Olsen · Republican, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice vote on an amendment
Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 12, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 95 to 0 · Feb 23, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 27, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 203.
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 24, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 17, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 26, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Feb 24, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 23, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 95 to 0.
-
Feb 23, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 12, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 12, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.
-
Nov 12, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 23, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.
-
Oct 23, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Staskunas, Jorgensen, Parisi, Kerkman, Suder, Wood, Turner, Roys, Cullen, Gunderson, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Sinicki, A. Ott, Knodl, Hraychuck and Ballweg;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, A. Lasee, Olsen, Coggs and Kedzie
- Oct 23, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Staskunas
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 95, Noes 0
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 24, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 203
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-5-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote