Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 524

The jurisdictional amount and court fees in certain small claims actions

Topics: Circuit court, Court: Fee, Small claims court

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 27, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person may bring a small claims action in the circuit court for a money judgment, attachment, garnishment, or to enforce a lien, only if the amount claimed is not more than $5,000. Under this bill, if the person bringing the action has commenced 20 or fewer actions in small claims for a money judgment, attachment, garnishment, or to enforced a lien, within the previous 365 days, the amount claimed may not exceed $10,000. If the person bringing the action has commenced more than 20 such actions in small claims within the previous 365 days, the bill limits the amount claimed to not more than $5,000.

Currently, the fee for filing a small claims action in the circuit court is $22, with some exceptions, including for garnishment actions, if a counterclaim or cross complaint is filed, or if a demand for a trial is made. Under this bill, if the person bringing the action has commenced 20 or fewer actions in small claims for a money judgment, attachment, or to enforce a lien, within the previous 365 days, the person must pay a filing fee equal to 150 percent of the regular fee; $33. If the person bringing the action has commenced 21 or more actions in small claims for a money judgment, attachment, or to enforce a lien, within the previous 365 days, the person must pay a filing fee equal to 200 percent of the regular fee; $44.

Read the full summary

Under the bill, if a party proves that a person commencing a small claims action in the circuit court for a money judgment, attachment, garnishment, or to enforce a lien misrepresented the number of such actions the person commenced, the court is required to award the party damages of $250 and reasonable attorney fees.

Who's behind it

4 lawmakers are its ⁠. 3 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

5 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 9 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (5)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 4 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote on an amendment

Passed, 7 to 3 · Feb 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 3 · Feb 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 11 to 5 · Mar 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 49 to 48 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 49, Noes 48”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  3. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 49 to 48.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Mar 17, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 5.

  8. Feb 5, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  9. Feb 5, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 3.

  10. Jan 12, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Dec 1, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Oct 27, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics.

  13. Oct 27, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Sherman, Berceau, Pope-Roberts and Ballweg;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Holperin, Wirch, Hansen, Schultz and Olsen

  2. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Dec 1, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Olsen withdrawn as a cosponsor

  5. Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Kessler

  6. Jan 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hebl

  7. Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  10. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 7, Noes 3

  11. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  12. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  13. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance

  14. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 5

  15. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 5

  16. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:10 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  18. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Ballweg withdrawn as a coauthor

  19. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 2 adopted

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 49, Noes 48

  24. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  26. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  27. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote