Assembly Bill 529
Violations of the Wisconsin Uniform Securities Law and providing a penalty
Topics: Circuit court, Fines, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Securities: Regulation, Securities, Division of, Senior citizen, Sentences and penalties
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Oct 27, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Mar 4, 2010
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 196
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Current law includes numerous provisions prohibiting fraud, in various forms, in connection with securities transactions or the offering or sale of securities. These provisions include making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting a material fact necessary to make a statement not misleading in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security; engaging in market manipulation; publishing, circulating, or using false advertising; and making material false or misleading statements or misleading omissions in documents filed with the Division of Securities in the Department of Financial Institutions (division). Broker-dealers and investment advisers also may not engage in fraud or employ manipulative, deceptive, or fraudulent devices.
Under current law, a person who violates the state's securities laws may be subject to criminal liability or civil liability or both. A person who willfully violates the state's securities laws, with certain exceptions, is guilty of a Class H felony, punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of six years or both. The division may refer violations for criminal prosecution to the attorney general or a district attorney. A person may also be subject to a civil enforcement proceeding for violating the state's securities laws. The division may bring a civil enforcement action in circuit court for securities law violations or may refer the matter to the attorney general or a district attorney to bring such an action.
Read the full summary Show less
The division may also issue an order relating to securities law violations and, upon request, must conduct an administrative hearing on the order in which findings of fact and conclusions of law are recorded. In a civil enforcement proceeding, the court in a circuit court proceeding or the division in an administrative proceeding may impose a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for a single violation or not more than $250,000 for more than one violation.
This bill creates a penalty enhancer for violations of the state's securities laws.
If a person is convicted of a crime for violating the state's securities laws and the crime is committed against another person who is at least 65 years of age, for each such offense the maximum fine may be increased by not more than $5,000 and the maximum term of imprisonment may be increased by not more than five years. In a civil enforcement proceeding, the court in a circuit court proceeding or the division in an administrative proceeding may impose a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for a single violation, or not more than $500,000 for more than one violation, if the violation is against another person who is at least 65 years of age when the violation occurs. The fact that the defendant did not know the age of the victim, or reasonably believed the victim was not at least 65 years of age, is not a defense to this penalty enhancement.
Under current law, in a civil enforcement proceeding before the circuit court, the court may order a person who violates the state's securities laws to pay restitution, to disgorge profits, and to pay prejudgment and postjudgment interest, in addition to imposing a civil penalty. This bill allows the division, in an administrative civil enforcement proceeding, to also include in its orders the payment of restitution, the disgorgement of profits, and the payment of interest at the legal rate.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.
Who's behind it
24 lawmakers are its . 21 are Democrats, 1 is a Independent and 1 is a Republican. 1 has no party on record.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 28 names Hide the names
Authors (24)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Peter Barca · Democrat, Assembly
- Chuck Benedict · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Fred Clark · Democrat, Assembly
- David Cullen · Democrat, Assembly
- Chris Danou · Democrat, Assembly
- Jason Fields · Democrat, Assembly
- Phil Garthwaite · Democrat, Assembly
- Steve Hilgenberg · Democrat, Assembly
- Kim Hixson · Democrat, Assembly
- Ann Hraychuck · Democrat, Assembly
- Andy Jorgensen · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jon Richards · Democrat, Assembly
- Sherman
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
- Bob Ziegelbauer · Independent, Assembly
- Ted Zigmunt · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Dale Schultz · Republican, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
- Bob Wirch · Democrat, Senate
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it
Passed, 8 to 1 · Mar 2, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 27, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 196.
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 24, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 17, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Mar 8, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.
-
Mar 5, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Mar 4, 2010
The Assembly passed it.
-
Mar 2, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 2, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.
-
Jan 27, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Oct 27, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.
-
Oct 27, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hilgenberg, Hixson, Ziegelbauer, A. Ott, Young, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Milroy, Sherman, Cullen, Vruwink, Jorgensen, Hraychuck, Mason, Pasch, Benedict, Clark, Fields, Richards, Barca, Zigmunt, Smith, Danou and Garthwaite;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Miller, Taylor and Schultz
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 196
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-5-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote