Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
violations of the Wisconsin Uniform Securities Law and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Current law includes numerous provisions prohibiting fraud, in various forms,
in connection with securities transactions or the offering or sale of securities. These
provisions include making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting a
material fact necessary to make a statement not misleading in connection with the
offer, sale, or purchase of a security; engaging in market manipulation; publishing,
circulating, or using false advertising; and making material false or misleading
statements or misleading omissions in documents filed with the Division of
Securities in the Department of Financial Institutions (division). Broker-dealers
and investment advisers also may not engage in fraud or employ manipulative,
deceptive, or fraudulent devices.
Under current law, a person who violates the state's securities laws may be
subject to criminal liability or civil liability or both. A person who willfully violates
the state's securities laws, with certain exceptions, is guilty of a Class H felony,
punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of
six years or both. The division may refer violations for criminal prosecution to the
attorney general or a district attorney. A person may also be subject to a civil
enforcement proceeding for violating the state's securities laws. The division may
bring a civil enforcement action in circuit court for securities law violations or may
refer the matter to the attorney general or a district attorney to bring such an action.
The division may also issue an order relating to securities law violations and, upon
request, must conduct an administrative hearing on the order in which findings of
fact and conclusions of law are recorded. In a civil enforcement proceeding, the court
in a circuit court proceeding or the division in an administrative proceeding may
impose a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for a single violation or not more than
$250,000 for more than one violation.
This bill creates a penalty enhancer for violations of the state's securities laws.
If a person is convicted of a crime for violating the state's securities laws and the
crime is committed against another person who is at least 65 years of age, for each
such offense the maximum fine may be increased by not more than $5,000 and the
maximum term of imprisonment may be increased by not more than five years. In
a civil enforcement proceeding, the court in a circuit court proceeding or the division
in an administrative proceeding may impose a civil penalty of not more than $10,000
for a single violation, or not more than $500,000 for more than one violation, if the
violation is against another person who is at least 65 years of age when the violation
occurs. The fact that the defendant did not know the age of the victim, or reasonably
believed the victim was not at least 65 years of age, is not a defense to this penalty
enhancement.
Under current law, in a civil enforcement proceeding before the circuit court,
the court may order a person who violates the state's securities laws to pay
restitution, to disgorge profits, and to pay prejudgment and postjudgment interest,
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Barca (D) , Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Clark (D) , Cullen (D) , Danou (D) , Fields (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hixson (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Mason (D) , Milroy (D) , Pasch (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Sherman , Smith (D) , Vruwink (D) , Young (D) , Ziegelbauer (I) , Zigmunt (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1
Passed 8–1 Mar 2, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Mar 24, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hilgenberg, Hixson, Ziegelbauer, A. Ott, Young, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Milroy, Sherman, Cullen, Vruwink, Jorgensen, Hraychuck, Mason, Pasch, Benedict, Clark, Fields, Richards, Barca, Zigmunt, Smith, Danou and Garthwaite;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Miller, Taylor and Schultz
- Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 196
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-5-2010