Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 529

Violations of the Wisconsin Uniform Securities Law and providing a penalty

Topics: Circuit court, Fines, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Securities: Regulation, Securities, Division of, Senior citizen, Sentences and penalties

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 27, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Mar 4, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 196

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law includes numerous provisions prohibiting fraud, in various forms, in connection with securities transactions or the offering or sale of securities. These provisions include making any untrue statement of a material fact or omitting a material fact necessary to make a statement not misleading in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of a security; engaging in market manipulation; publishing, circulating, or using false advertising; and making material false or misleading statements or misleading omissions in documents filed with the Division of Securities in the Department of Financial Institutions (division). Broker-dealers and investment advisers also may not engage in fraud or employ manipulative, deceptive, or fraudulent devices.

Under current law, a person who violates the state's securities laws may be subject to criminal liability or civil liability or both. A person who willfully violates the state's securities laws, with certain exceptions, is guilty of a Class H felony, punishable by a maximum fine of $10,000 or a maximum term of imprisonment of six years or both. The division may refer violations for criminal prosecution to the attorney general or a district attorney. A person may also be subject to a civil enforcement proceeding for violating the state's securities laws. The division may bring a civil enforcement action in circuit court for securities law violations or may refer the matter to the attorney general or a district attorney to bring such an action.

Read the full summary

The division may also issue an order relating to securities law violations and, upon request, must conduct an administrative hearing on the order in which findings of fact and conclusions of law are recorded. In a civil enforcement proceeding, the court in a circuit court proceeding or the division in an administrative proceeding may impose a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for a single violation or not more than $250,000 for more than one violation.

This bill creates a penalty enhancer for violations of the state's securities laws.

If a person is convicted of a crime for violating the state's securities laws and the crime is committed against another person who is at least 65 years of age, for each such offense the maximum fine may be increased by not more than $5,000 and the maximum term of imprisonment may be increased by not more than five years. In a civil enforcement proceeding, the court in a circuit court proceeding or the division in an administrative proceeding may impose a civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for a single violation, or not more than $500,000 for more than one violation, if the violation is against another person who is at least 65 years of age when the violation occurs. The fact that the defendant did not know the age of the victim, or reasonably believed the victim was not at least 65 years of age, is not a defense to this penalty enhancement.

Under current law, in a civil enforcement proceeding before the circuit court, the court may order a person who violates the state's securities laws to pay restitution, to disgorge profits, and to pay prejudgment and postjudgment interest, in addition to imposing a civil penalty. This bill allows the division, in an administrative civil enforcement proceeding, to also include in its orders the payment of restitution, the disgorgement of profits, and the payment of interest at the legal rate.

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

24 lawmakers are its ⁠. 21 are Democrats, 1 is a Independent and 1 is a Republican. 1 has no party on record.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 28 names

Authors (24)

Signed on in support (4)

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection vote to recommend it

Passed, 8 to 1 · Mar 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Judiciary vote to recommend it

Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 27, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 22, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 196.

  3. Apr 20, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 24, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.

  6. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Mar 8, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  8. Mar 5, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  9. Mar 4, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Mar 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 1.

  12. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  13. Oct 27, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  14. Oct 27, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hilgenberg, Hixson, Ziegelbauer, A. Ott, Young, Berceau, Pope-Roberts, Milroy, Sherman, Cullen, Vruwink, Jorgensen, Hraychuck, Mason, Pasch, Benedict, Clark, Fields, Richards, Barca, Zigmunt, Smith, Danou and Garthwaite;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch, Miller, Taylor and Schultz

  2. Oct 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  5. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  6. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  7. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules

  8. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  9. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  10. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  11. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  12. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  13. Mar 5, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  14. Mar 8, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  15. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  16. Mar 23, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  17. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  18. Mar 24, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  19. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  20. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  22. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  23. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  24. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  25. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  26. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010

  28. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 196

  29. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-5-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote