Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
managed forest land being converted to agricultural land.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers
the managed forest land (MFL) program, which exempts an owner of land that is
designated MFL from payment of municipal property taxes on the land in exchange
for a lower payment per acre. In exchange, the owner must comply with certain
forestry practices and must allow the public on the land for hunting, fishing, and
other outdoor recreational activities unless the landowner elects to pay an extra
amount per acre to keep a limited number of acres closed. In addition, an owner of
MFL must pay a withdrawal tax and a withdrawal fee when the owner withdraws
the land from the program before the order designating the land as MFL expires.
Orders are for 25 or 50 years.
Under current law, an owner is exempt from paying the withdrawal tax and the
withdrawal fee if the owner withdraws the MFL to transfer the land for a public road
or a utility right-of-way or to the federal or state government or a local governmental
unit for a conservation purpose such as a park or public forest. This bill expands this
exemption to include withdrawals to convert MFL to agricultural land if the land has
been MFL for at least five years. The bill incorporates the definition of "agriculture
land" that exists under current law for property tax assessment purposes.
"Agricultural land" is land that is devoted primarily to agricultural use, as defined
by rule by the Department of Revenue. "Agricultural use," in turn, is defined in this
rule to include land that is enrolled in certain federal agriculture programs and land
that is subject to the stream bank protection program administered by DNR. Under
the bill, MFL that is converted to agricultural land is subject to the same public
recreational access requirements until the date that the MFL order would have
expired (original expiration date).
The bill provides that if the owner stops using the land for agricultural use
before the original expiration date, the owner must pay the withdrawal tax and the
withdrawal fee that would have been payable at the time of the conversion, and the
land is no longer subject to the public recreational access requirements.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 11, Noes 0
Passed 11–0 Mar 3, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
- Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture
- Nov 19, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Nov 19, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1