Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 533

Using the results of standardized examinations to evaluate teachers and requiring the development of a teacher evaluation plan to be a mandatory subject of collective bargaining

Topics: Collective bargaining, School: Board, School: Branches of instruction, Teacher

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 29, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law directs school districts to administer certain standardized examinations to pupils enrolled in the 4th, 8th, and 10th grades. Current law prohibits a school board from using the results of the examinations to evaluate teacher performance; to discharge, suspend, or formally discipline a teacher; or as the reason for the nonrenewal of a teacher's contract.

This bill allows the results of the state-required standardized examinations and the standardized examinations required under the federal No Child Left Behind Act to be used for the evaluation of teacher performance if certain conditions are met.

Read the full summary

The school board must develop a teacher evaluation plan that includes a description of the evaluation process, multiple criteria in addition to examination results, the rationale for using examination results for evaluating teachers, and an explanation of how the school board intends to use the evaluations to improve pupil academic achievement. This bill also requires a school district to bargain collectively over the development of the teacher evaluation plan.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 5 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 5”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 5, 2009

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-5-2009” (the official wording)

  3. Nov 3, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Nov 3, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 5.

  5. Nov 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Nov 2, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Oct 29, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  8. Oct 29, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Dexter, Sinicki and Hixson

  2. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Nov 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Davis

  5. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Davis

  6. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 7, Noes 5

  10. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 11-5-2009

  13. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Davis and Vukmir

  14. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Davis and Vukmir

  15. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote