Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 536

Authorizing the Department of Public Instruction, the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical College System, and the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities to study each other's education programs, requiring a written agreement concerning such studies, and requiring the establishment of a longitudinal data system of student data

Topics: Parochial and private educational institutions, Privacy, Public Instruction, Department of, Technical college, University of Wisconsin

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Oct 29, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill directs the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, the Technical College System Board, the Department of Public Instruction, and the Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities (agencies) to enter into a written agreement that:

1. Requires the agencies to establish a longitudinal data system of student data that links such data from preschool programs through postsecondary education programs.

Read the full summary

2. Describes the process by which any of the agencies may evaluate and study education programs operated or supervised by one or more of the other agencies.

3. Requires an agency to obtain the approval of, and enter into a written agreement with, the other agency before it can study or evaluate the latter agency's education programs.

4. Requires the agencies to exchange student data to the extent necessary to perform the evaluation or study.

5. Allows the agencies to collaborate with other persons, including state agencies, to import workforce or other data into the longitudinal data system to assist with an evaluation or study.

The bill authorizes the agencies to submit student data to the longitudinal data system, to another agency, or to a public or private research organization to support an evaluation or study. If the student data contains personally identifiable information, however, an agency's disclosure must be in connection with a data-sharing agreement that:

1. Specifies the purpose, scope, and duration of the agreement.

2. Requires the recipient to use personally identifiable information only for the purpose specified.

3. Describes the specific data access, use, and security restrictions with which the recipient must comply.

4. Requires that the personally identifiable information be destroyed or returned when no longer needed or upon expiration of the data-sharing agreement, whichever occurs first.

5. If the disclosure is to a public or private research organization, prohibits the personal identification of any person by individuals other than authorized representatives of the recipient who have legitimate interests in the information.

Who's behind it

4 representatives are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

1 more lawmaker ⁠.

See all 5 names

Authors (4)

Signed on in support (1)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Education vote on an amendment

Passed, 9 to 3 · Nov 3, 2009

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Nov 5, 2009

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  3. Nov 5, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  4. Nov 3, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  5. Nov 3, 2009

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 1.

  6. Nov 3, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Nov 2, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Oct 29, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Education.

  9. Oct 29, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Dexter, Sinicki and Hixson

  2. Oct 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Education

  3. Oct 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  4. Nov 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 9, Noes 3

  9. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Education, Ayes 11, Noes 1

  10. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Rules

  12. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  13. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Taylor added as a cosponsor

  14. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Krusick

  15. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Krusick

  16. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  17. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote