Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 549

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, the Law Enforcement Standards Board (board) establishes

minimum qualification standards for law enforcement officers. The board may

establish, in addition to education and training standards, qualification standards

relating to the competence and reliability of a person to assume and discharge the

responsibilities of a law enforcement officer.

This bill provides that a candidate for a full-time law enforcement or tribal law

enforcement officer position must submit to a psychological evaluation before being

appointed as a full-time law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officer. This

evaluation requirement applies to law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officers

appointed on or after January 1, 2010. The bill also requires local law enforcement

agencies, and state agencies that employ law enforcement officers, to review the

psychological evaluation of a candidate for a law enforcement officer position before

appointing the individual as a full-time law enforcement officer.

Current law permits closure of access to public records concerning

psychological evaluations under some circumstances. This bill specifies that all of

the psychological evaluations provided for under the bill are confidential and not

subject to inspection or copying under the public records access law.

The bill requires the board to promulgate rules for the content of a required

psychological evaluation for full-time law enforcement and tribal law enforcement

officers. The bill also requires the board to submit a report to the legislature by April

1, 2011, that evaluates the effect of the requirement for psychological evaluations for

law enforcement officers, makes a recommendation as to whether psychological

evaluations should be required for part-time or limited term law enforcement and

tribal law enforcement officers, and makes a recommendation as to whether

psychological evaluations should be required for officers appointed to serve on a

special weapons and tactics unit. Finally, the bill makes the requirement for

psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers a prohibited subject of

bargaining under the State Employment Labor Relations Act.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Cullen (D) , Danou (D) , Gunderson (R) , Hraychuck (D) , Ripp (R) , Sinicki (D) , Toles (D) , Townsend (R) , Vruwink (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D) , Ziegelbauer (I)

7 cosponsors

A. Lasee (R) , Coggs (D) , Hansen (D) , Holperin (D) , Mursau (R) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

Passed 10–0 Feb 12, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

Passed 4–1 Mar 4, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Bies, Danou, Gunderson, Young, Zepnick, Sinicki, Vruwink, Brooks, Cullen, Toles, Benedict, Berceau, Townsend, Ripp and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Holperin, A. Lasee, Coggs, Schultz and Taylor

  2. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  9. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  10. Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  12. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  13. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  14. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 by committee on Rules

  16. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  17. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  18. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  19. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Mursau added as a coauthor

  20. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  21. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  22. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  23. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  25. Mar 1, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  26. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  27. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  28. Mar 4, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  29. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1