Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Law Enforcement Standards Board (board) establishes
minimum qualification standards for law enforcement officers. The board may
establish, in addition to education and training standards, qualification standards
relating to the competence and reliability of a person to assume and discharge the
responsibilities of a law enforcement officer.
This bill provides that a candidate for a full-time law enforcement or tribal law
enforcement officer position must submit to a psychological evaluation before being
appointed as a full-time law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officer. This
evaluation requirement applies to law enforcement or tribal law enforcement officers
appointed on or after January 1, 2010. The bill also requires local law enforcement
agencies, and state agencies that employ law enforcement officers, to review the
psychological evaluation of a candidate for a law enforcement officer position before
appointing the individual as a full-time law enforcement officer.
Current law permits closure of access to public records concerning
psychological evaluations under some circumstances. This bill specifies that all of
the psychological evaluations provided for under the bill are confidential and not
subject to inspection or copying under the public records access law.
The bill requires the board to promulgate rules for the content of a required
psychological evaluation for full-time law enforcement and tribal law enforcement
officers. The bill also requires the board to submit a report to the legislature by April
1, 2011, that evaluates the effect of the requirement for psychological evaluations for
law enforcement officers, makes a recommendation as to whether psychological
evaluations should be required for part-time or limited term law enforcement and
tribal law enforcement officers, and makes a recommendation as to whether
psychological evaluations should be required for officers appointed to serve on a
special weapons and tactics unit. Finally, the bill makes the requirement for
psychological evaluations for law enforcement officers a prohibited subject of
bargaining under the State Employment Labor Relations Act.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 12, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
Passed 4–1 Mar 4, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Bies, Danou, Gunderson, Young, Zepnick, Sinicki, Vruwink, Brooks, Cullen, Toles, Benedict, Berceau, Townsend, Ripp and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Holperin, A. Lasee, Coggs, Schultz and Taylor
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck
- Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Hraychuck
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Representative Mursau added as a coauthor
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 26, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 1, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing
- Mar 3, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing, Ayes 4, Noes 1
- Mar 4, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1