Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 553

Creating new grounds for discipline of hearing instrument specialists, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists, changing licensing requirements for audiologists, and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Advertisement: Fraudulent, Regulation and Licensing, Department of, Trades and occupations

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 5, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes the following changes to the regulation of speech-language pathologists and audiologists.

Prohibited conduct .

Read the full summary

1.

Deceptive advertising . Under current law, the Hearing and Speech Examining Board (board) in the Department of Regulation and Licensing (department) may reprimand the holder of a license or permit issued by the board or revoke, suspend, limit, or deny a license or permit if the holder or applicant engages in certain prohibited conduct, including false, misleading, or deceptive advertising. The bill prohibits deceptive advertising instead of false, misleading, or deceptive advertising. In addition, the bill creates a definition for "deceptive advertising," which includes creating or using promotional literature, testimonials, insignia, or other representation which is misleading, false, or untruthful.

2.

Misrepresentation . The bill prohibits the holder of a license or permit from making an intentional or negligent representation regarding a hearing aid or services. The bill also prohibits the holder of a license or permit from misusing words that imply the involvement of the medical or audiology professions when there is no such involvement. Finally, the bill prohibits a hearing instrument specialist from intentionally or negligently misrepresenting the cause of a hearing impairment, or the cure of a hearing impairment by the use of a hearing aid.

Audiologist license . Under current law, a person seeking an audiologist license must have received a master's degree in audiology or completed education or training that the board determines is substantially equivalent. The person must also complete a postgraduate clinical fellowship in audiology approved by the board or substantially equivalent education or training. The person must also pass an examination required for certification by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association or a substantially equivalent exam, as well as practical techniques tests administered by the board. The board may grant a license to practice audiology to a person who holds a current audiologist license in another state or United States territory if the board determines that the requirements for licensure are substantially equivalent to the requirements in this state.

With certain exceptions, the bill changes the requirements for audiologist licensure effective January 1, 2010. Beginning on that date, to obtain an audiologist license a person must do all of the following:

1. Either possess a doctoral degree in audiology or submit evidence of substantially equivalent education or training. The doctoral degree program must consist of not less than three years of educational course work and not less than 12 months of clinical rotation or externship.

2. Pass an exam selected or approved by the board as well as practical techniques tests administered by the board. The bill requires the board to select and approve examinations for audiology by rule. The bill authorizes the board to grant a license to practice audiology to a person who holds a current audiologist license in another state or United States territory if the applicant received a masters degree in audiology or completed education or training that the board determines is substantially equivalent and the board determines that the requirements for licensure are substantially equivalent to the requirements in this state.

Temporary license to practice audiology . Under current law, the board may grant a temporary license to practice audiology to a person who is completing a postgraduate fellowship if the person practices under the supervision of a licensed audiologist and satisfies other requirements. The bill eliminates temporary licensure for a person completing a postgraduate fellowship effective January 1, 2010. The bill permits the board to grant a temporary license to practice audiology to a person who satisfies all the requirements for licensure but who has not completed the practical techniques tests administered by the board.

Other changes . Under current law, a corporation or mercantile establishment that sells or offers to sell hearing aids must employ a person licensed by the department as a hearing aid specialist or licensed or permitted by the board to practice audiology. The corporation or mercantile establishment must annually file with the board a list of persons employed to sell or fit hearing aids. This bill eliminates the annual filing requirement.

Under current law, persons who use audiometric equipment to evaluate hearing sensitivity for the fitting and sale of hearing aids must periodically calibrate the equipment and send certification of the calibration to the board. This bill eliminates the requirement that a certificate of calibration be sent to the board.

Under current law, a Council on Speech Language Pathology and Audiology (council) in the department serves the board in an advisory capacity. This bill eliminates the council.

Who's behind it

7 representatives are its ⁠. 4 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.

4 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (7)

Signed on in support (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 13 to 0 · Mar 29, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 13, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 29, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 29, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 13 to 0.

  4. Jan 20, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Nov 13, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Nov 5, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  7. Nov 5, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Zepnick, Turner, A. Ott, Newcomer, Townsend, Danou and Kerkman;Cosponsored by Senators Lehman, Taylor, Olsen and Kedzie

  2. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  3. Nov 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Seidel

  7. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  9. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 13, Noes 0

  10. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:12 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote