Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 559

Notice of firearm prohibition when served with notice of an injunction hearing and process for surrendering firearms following the granting of certain injunctions

Topics: Court: Procedure, Firearms and dangerous weapons, Service of process and papers

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 10, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person is prohibited from possessing a firearm and must surrender any firearm he or she currently possesses if he or she is subject to a domestic abuse injunction, a child abuse injunction, or, if the court determines that he or she may use a firearm to harm another or endanger public safety, a harassment injunction (injunction). A person who is subject to an injunction may surrender his or her firearm to a sheriff or to a third party approved by the court and is guilty of a Class G felony if convicted of possessing a firearm while subject to the injunction.

This bill creates a procedure for notifying a person of the prohibition against possessing a firearm and of the requirement to surrender any firearm when the person is served with a petition for an injunction hearing.

Read the full summary

The bill also creates a procedure for surrendering firearms if the court grants an injunction. If the person who is subject to the injunction (respondent) is present at the injunction hearing, he or she may provide the court with a completed firearm possession form, which is a form that requests information such as the quantity and the make and model of any firearms he or she owns or possesses or has owned or possessed in the previous six months. If the respondent is not present at the injunctive hearing, the court must provide the petitioner with the opportunity to state if the respondent possesses a firearm and, if so, the quantity and make and model of any firearm. If the court is not satisfied that the respondent does not possess a firearm, a firearm surrender hearing must take place within one week of the injunction hearing. If, subject to certain conditions, the respondent surrenders all firearms to the sheriff or to a third party within 48 hours, the court must dismiss the firearm surrender hearing unless the court has a reason related to the surrender of firearms not to dismiss the hearing.

If the court does not dismiss the hearing, a respondent must attend a firearm surrender hearing if the respondent did not appear at the injunction hearing and the court is not satisfied that the respondent does not possess a firearm or the respondent wants to surrender a firearm to a third party that did not appear at the injunction hearing. If a respondent is required to attend the hearing but does not, the court must issue an arrest warrant for the respondent.

At a firearm surrender hearing, if the respondent wants to surrender a firearm to a third party who attends the firearm surrender hearing, the court shall, subject to certain conditions, permit the surrender. If the third party is not at the firearm surrender hearing or the conditions are not met, or the respondent does not want to surrender a firearm to a third party, the court must order the respondent to surrender his or her firearm to the sheriff within 48 hours of the order. If the respondent fails to comply with the order, the court must issue an arrest warrant for the respondent.

Who's behind it

19 lawmakers are its ⁠. 15 are Democrats and 4 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (19)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Feb 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing.

  3. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Apr 15, 2010

    “Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010” (the official wording)

  7. Feb 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  8. Feb 16, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  9. Feb 5, 2010

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received” (the official wording)

  10. Jan 21, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  11. Dec 10, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  12. Dec 4, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Dec 2, 2009

    “Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes” (the official wording)

  14. Nov 23, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  15. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

  16. Nov 10, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Bernard Schaber, Staskunas, Roys, Turner, Fields, Pasch, Milroy, A. Ott, Hraychuck, Richards, Sinicki, Kestell, Hebl, Zepnick, Seidel, Grigsby, Toles, LeMahieu and Newcomer;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Robson, Lassa, Jauch, Risser and Coggs

  2. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Nov 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Nov 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Dec 2, 2009 · Assembly

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties requested pursuant to s. 13.525 (5) Wisconsin Statutes

  6. Dec 4, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Dec 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  9. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report of joint review committee on Criminal Penalties received

  10. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Van Roy and Bernard Schaber

  11. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by committee on Corrections and the Courts

  13. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  14. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  15. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  16. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  17. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:16 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-15-2010

  19. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 adopted

  22. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Bernard Schaber

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 adopted

  24. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  25. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  26. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  27. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  28. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  29. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing

  30. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote