Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 575

Requiring the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to establish standards for products sold as honey, prohibiting the labeling as Wisconsin certified honey of a product that has not been determined to meet the standards, prohibiting the labeling as honey of a product that does not meet the standards, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Bees, Damage (personal injury), Food

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 16, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 10, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Jan 28, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 169

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 19, 2010: “Published 3-29-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) to promulgate rules that establish standards for products sold as honey and standards for the testing by private laboratories of samples submitted by persons who wish to sell honey produced in this state as Wisconsin certified honey.

The standards for honey must be consistent with the standard for honey under the Codex Alimentarius of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.

Read the full summary

The bill prohibits labeling a product as Wisconsin certified honey or implying that a product is Wisconsin certified honey, unless the product has been determined by testing to meet the standards established by DATCP, DATCP has approved a summary of the testing, and the product was produced in this state. Under the bill, DATCP investigates violations of this prohibition and may bring an action to enjoin violations.

The bill also prohibits labeling a product as honey or implying that a product is honey, unless the product meets the standards established by DATCP. Any person who suffers damages as a result of a violation of this prohibition may bring an action against the violator to recover the amount of the person's damages or $1,000, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney fees.

Who's behind it

19 lawmakers are its ⁠. 13 are Democrats and 6 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (19)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Agriculture vote to recommend it

Passed, 11 to 0 · Jan 26, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 11, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 19, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 16, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 169.

  3. Mar 11, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 16, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Feb 16, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  6. Feb 2, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.

  7. Jan 29, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  8. Jan 28, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  9. Jan 28, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  10. Jan 26, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  11. Jan 26, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 11 to 0.

  12. Nov 13, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  13. Nov 12, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Nov 10, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Agriculture.

  15. Nov 10, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Garthwaite, Vruwink, Barca, Ballweg, Brooks, Clark, Hilgenberg, Kerkman, Knodl, Molepske Jr., A. Ott, Pasch, Roys, Schneider, Steinbrink, Tauchen, Turner, Young and Zigmunt;Cosponsored by Senators Vinehout, Lehman, Miller and Schultz

  2. Nov 10, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture

  3. Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Nov 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 21, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Agriculture, Ayes 11, Noes 0

  7. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Rules

  9. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative Smith added as a coauthor

  10. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Jan 29, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Feb 2, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Agriculture and Higher Education

  17. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Agriculture and Higher Education and take up

  18. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  22. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Senator Lassa added as a cosponsor

  23. Feb 16, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  24. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  25. Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  26. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-11-2010

  27. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-15-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 169

  28. Mar 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 3-29-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote