Assembly Bill 578
Healthy and environmentally sensitive cleaning in certain buildings, providing an exemption from emergency rule procedures, and granting rule-making authority
Topics: Environmental protection, Health Services, Department of: Health, Public building, School: Building, State office building, United States: Environmental Protection Agency, University of Wisconsin: Building
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Nov 12, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
This bill requires the Department of Health Services (DHS) to promulgate rules requiring cleaning that minimizes adverse effects on human health and the environment (healthy and environmentally sensitive cleaning) in school buildings, buildings on University of Wisconsin campuses, other buildings owned by this state, buildings owned by a technical college district board, and buildings owned by a city, village, town, or county (political subdivision). DHS must consult with the Council on Healthy and Environmentally Sensitive Cleaning, created by the bill, in promulgating the rules. Under the bill, DHS may grant a one-year exemption from a requirement in the rules if a person responsible for complying with the requirement demonstrates that compliance would increase its cleaning costs.
The bill requires DHS to include, in the initial rules for healthy and environmentally sensitive cleaning, requirements to use certain products that are approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under its voluntary Design for the Environment Program or by one or more of three specified private groups.
Read the full summary Show less
The products include restroom cleaners, general purpose cleaners, hand soap, toilet paper and paper towels, vacuum cleaners, and carpet extractors. The initial requirements for using approved products take effect one year after the bill is enacted. DHS may later modify the requirements for approvals for those products.
The bill authorizes DHS to adopt, by rule, an approval requirement for an additional type of product for janitorial or sanitation use if EPA, Green Seal, Inc., or TerraChoice Environmental Marketing (which operates the EcoLogo program) approves the type of product. DHS may require approval by a group other than one of the specified groups, if DHS determines that the other group bases its approval on a standard that is practical and promotes healthy and environmentally sensitive cleaning.
The bill also requires DHS to include in its initial rules the requirement to use a cleaning system approved by the Greenguard Environmental Institute (GEI), a private nonprofit group, under its Children and Schools standard for any cleaning use for which the GEI has approved a cleaning system. A cleaning system consists of specific cleaning products, materials for applying the cleaning products, equipment, and instructions for a specified cleaning use that a manufacturer submits to GEI for certification. The requirement to use an approved cleaning system takes effect two years after the bill is enacted, except that for buildings owned by this state, other than buildings on a University of Wisconsin campus, and for buildings owned by a political subdivision the requirement takes effect three years after the bill is enacted.
The bill authorizes DHS to require approval of cleaning systems by a different group than GEI or to authorize the use of a cleaning system approved by either GEI or another specified group if the department determines that the other group's standard is practical and addresses other health or environmental concerns in addition to indoor air quality. Under the bill, the requirement to use an approved cleaning system overrides the requirement to use a type of cleaning product approved by a specified group if there is an approved cleaning system that includes the type of cleaning product.
Who's behind it
7 representatives are its . All 7 are Democrats.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 9 names Hide the names
Authors (7)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
- Tamara Grigsby · Democrat, Assembly
- Cory Mason · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 5, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Feb 5, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 5, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 7.
-
Nov 30, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Nov 18, 2009
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Nov 12, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.
-
Nov 12, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Mason, Black, Berceau, Clark, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, Zepnick and Grigsby;Cosponsored by Senators Miller and Risser
- Nov 12, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Nov 18, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Nov 30, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 14, 2010 · Assembly
Representative Clark withdrawn as a coauthor
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Mason
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Clark
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Natural Resources
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Natural Resources
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by committee on Natural Resources
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 8, Noes 7
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 22, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 5 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:07 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote