Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 592

Registration of former military vehicles

Topics: Military property, Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Became law

The governor signed it on Mar 3, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Nov 20, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 23, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed 32 to 0

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 135

Latest entry in the official record, Mar 5, 2010: “Published 3-17-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, an owner of a motor vehicle that is of model year 1945 or earlier may register the vehicle as an antique vehicle. Antique vehicles may be driven only for special occasions such as display and parade purposes or for necessary testing, maintenance, and storage purposes. Also under current law, the Department of Transportation (DOT) must refuse registration of any vehicle that is originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation unless the vehicle meets certain federal motor vehicle safety standards.

This bill allows former military vehicles to be registered in a manner similar to antique vehicles, with similar operating restrictions. The bill defines a former military vehicle as a vehicle, including a trailer but excluding a tracked vehicle, that was manufactured for use in any country's military forces and is maintained to accurately represent its military design and markings, regardless of the vehicle's size or weight. A former military vehicle may be registered as a "historic military vehicle" if it is at least 25 years old and has been imported into the United States from another country or if it has not been imported and is of any age. It is the applicant's burden to show that a vehicle is eligible for registration as a historic military vehicle.

Read the full summary

DOT must issue for the vehicle special plates of a distinctive design that show that the vehicle is registered as a historic military vehicle. The applicant must pay a one-time $5 registration fee and there is no fee for registration renewal. In addition, the applicant must pay a $25 processing fee, to cover the initial costs of production of special plates, until DOT has recovered $11,800 for its costs of plate development.

However, if the vehicle is currently registered by DOT under another registration category, the vehicle may be registered as a historic military vehicle without payment of any fee.

The bill also prohibits DOT from registering any vehicle that was manufactured for use in any country's military forces and that does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards. However, the bill allows DOT to register a former military vehicle as a historic military vehicle, or as a municipal or county vehicle operated in the public service, even if the vehicle was originally designed and manufactured for off-highway operation, does not meet federal motor vehicle safety standards, and was manufactured for use in a country's military forces.

Who's behind it

30 representatives are its ⁠. 16 are Democrats, 13 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

7 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 37 names

Authors (30)

Signed on in support (7)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 0 · Feb 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate vote to pass it

Passed, 32 to 0 · Feb 23, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Mar 5, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Mar 3, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 135.

  3. Mar 2, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Feb 23, 2010

    The Senate passed it too, 32 to 0.

  5. Feb 23, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Senate Organization.

  6. Feb 23, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  7. Feb 23, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  8. Feb 17, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  9. Feb 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  10. Dec 14, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  11. Dec 3, 2009

    The committee held a public hearing.

  12. Nov 20, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  13. Nov 20, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Nov 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Zigmunt, Steinbrink, Soletski, Berceau, Brooks, Clark, Colon, Danou, Davis, Hraychuck, Jorgensen, Kerkman, Kleefisch, Knodl, Lothian, Molepske Jr., Pasch, Petersen, Pope-Roberts, Ripp, Schneider, Sinicki, Strachota, Suder, Townsend, Turner, Van Roy, Vruwink, M. Williams and Ziegelbauer;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Plale, Holperin, Hopper, A. Lasee, Taylor and Wirch

  2. Nov 20, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Dec 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Dec 14, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-23-2010 by committee on Rules

  9. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up

  10. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  11. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  12. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  13. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  14. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  15. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  16. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization

  17. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended to withdraw from committee on Senate Organization and take up

  18. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  19. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  20. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  21. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 32, Noes 0

  22. Feb 23, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  23. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  24. Feb 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  25. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 3-2-2010

  26. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 135

  27. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 3-17-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote