Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 604

Eligibility for academic excellence higher education scholarships

Topics: Higher Educational Aids Board, Scholarships and loans, School

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 8, 2009

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain designated scholars who enroll full-time in a public or private institution of higher education in this state that is participating in the program. Currently, the scholarships may be awarded to 1) the senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state enrolling at least 80 but fewer than 500 pupils; 2) the two seniors with the two highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but fewer than 1,000 pupils; 3) the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but fewer than 1,500 pupils; 4) the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but fewer than 2,000 pupils; 5) the five seniors with the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 2,000 but fewer than 2,500 pupils; and 6) the six seniors with the six highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and not more than ten scholarships statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from high schools enrolling fewer than 80 pupils.

Currently, if two or more seniors from a high school have the same grade point average and are otherwise eligible for a scholarship, the applicable number of seniors are designated as scholars according to written tie-breaking criteria as required by HEAB by rule, and the remaining seniors with the same grade point average are certified as alternates, who may be awarded a scholarship if a designated scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education. For a high school that weights different courses differently to determine a pupil's grade point average, a senior with the next highest grade point average may also be certified as a scholar if the senior who is designated as a scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education and there is no other senior with the same grade point average as the designated scholar.

Read the full summary

This bill permits those seniors with the next highest grade point average, but not less than 3.800 or the equivalent, to be certified as alternates and permits such an alternate to receive a scholarship if a senior who is designated as a scholar or an alternate with the same grade point average does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education in all cases, regardless of how the high school weights its courses. The bill also changes the date by which a school must designate a scholar from February 15 to February 25 of a school year.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 6 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (3)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it

Passed, 12 to 0 · Mar 3, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 16 to 0 · Mar 17, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 17, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 17, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.

  4. Mar 3, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  5. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  6. Feb 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Dec 15, 2009

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Dec 8, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.

  9. Dec 8, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Hebl, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Pope-Roberts, Smith and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators Miller, Hansen and Taylor

  2. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities

  3. Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  8. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance

  10. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance

  11. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  12. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  13. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0

  14. Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules

  16. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  17. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote