Assembly Bill 604
Eligibility for academic excellence higher education scholarships
Topics: Higher Educational Aids Board, Scholarships and loans, School
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 8, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the Higher Educational Aids Board (HEAB) administers the Academic Excellence Higher Education Scholarship Program under which HEAB awards scholarships to certain designated scholars who enroll full-time in a public or private institution of higher education in this state that is participating in the program. Currently, the scholarships may be awarded to 1) the senior with the highest grade point average from each high school in this state enrolling at least 80 but fewer than 500 pupils; 2) the two seniors with the two highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 500 but fewer than 1,000 pupils; 3) the three seniors with the three highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,000 but fewer than 1,500 pupils; 4) the four seniors with the four highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 1,500 but fewer than 2,000 pupils; 5) the five seniors with the five highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling at least 2,000 but fewer than 2,500 pupils; and 6) the six seniors with the six highest grade point averages from each high school in this state enrolling 2,500 or more pupils. In addition, those scholarships may be awarded to the senior with the highest grade point average from the school operated by the Wisconsin Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the school operated by the Wisconsin Educational Services Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and not more than ten scholarships statewide may be awarded to seniors with the highest grade point averages from high schools enrolling fewer than 80 pupils.
Currently, if two or more seniors from a high school have the same grade point average and are otherwise eligible for a scholarship, the applicable number of seniors are designated as scholars according to written tie-breaking criteria as required by HEAB by rule, and the remaining seniors with the same grade point average are certified as alternates, who may be awarded a scholarship if a designated scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education. For a high school that weights different courses differently to determine a pupil's grade point average, a senior with the next highest grade point average may also be certified as a scholar if the senior who is designated as a scholar does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education and there is no other senior with the same grade point average as the designated scholar.
Read the full summary Show less
This bill permits those seniors with the next highest grade point average, but not less than 3.800 or the equivalent, to be certified as alternates and permits such an alternate to receive a scholarship if a senior who is designated as a scholar or an alternate with the same grade point average does not enroll in a participating institution of higher education in all cases, regardless of how the high school weights its courses. The bill also changes the date by which a school must designate a scholar from February 15 to February 25 of a school year.
Who's behind it
9 lawmakers are its . 6 are Republicans and 3 are Democrats.
3 more lawmakers .
See all 12 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Alvin Ott · Republican, Assembly
- Joan Ballweg · Republican, Senate
- Garey Bies · Republican, Assembly
- Edward Brooks · Republican, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Daniel LeMahieu · Republican, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- John Townsend · Republican, Assembly
Signed on in support (3)
- Dave Hansen · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Lena Taylor · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities vote to recommend it
Passed, 12 to 0 · Mar 3, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment
Passed, 16 to 0 · Mar 17, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Mar 17, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 17, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 16 to 0.
-
Mar 3, 2010
Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.
-
Feb 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 15, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 8, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Colleges and Universities.
-
Dec 8, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Ballweg, Bies, Brooks, Hebl, LeMahieu, A. Ott, Pope-Roberts, Smith and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators Miller, Hansen and Taylor
- Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Colleges and Universities
- Dec 15, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Colleges and Universities, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 16, Noes 0
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote