Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 607

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

requiring carbon monoxide detectors in buildings containing one or two dwelling units.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the owner of most buildings that contain one or two dwelling

units (dwelling) to install a carbon monoxide detector (detector) in the basement of

the dwelling and on each floor level except the attic or storage area of each dwelling

unit. Under the bill, the owner of the dwelling must install the detector according

to the directions and specifications of the manufacturer of the detector and requires

that the detector bear an Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., listing mark. If any

occupant who is not the owner, or any state or local building inspector, notifies the

owner that a detector is not functional, the owner must provide, within five days after

receipt of that notice, any maintenance necessary to make the detector functional.

The bill exempts an owner of a dwelling from damages resulting from a false alarm

from a detector that was reasonably maintained by the owner or from the failure of

the detector to operate properly as the result of tampering.

The bill requires new dwellings to have carbon monoxide detectors that are

wired to the dwelling's electrical service. Existing dwellings may use a battery

powered detector. The bill exempts certain dwellings from the requirement to install

detectors. Under the bill, no detector is required if the dwelling has no attached

garage, no fireplace, and no fuel-burning appliances.

The bill authorizes a state or local building inspector to inspect new dwellings,

and, at the request of a dwelling owner or renter, the interior of a dwelling unit to

ensure compliance with the requirements established under this bill.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Dexter (D) , Hintz (D) , Mason (D) , Zepnick (D)

3 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Sullivan (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Jan 26, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hintz, Mason, Dexter and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Sullivan and Erpenbach

  2. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hintz

  6. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 1-28-2010 by committee on Rules

  7. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by committee on Consumer Protection

  9. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  10. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Consumer Protection, Ayes 8, Noes 1

  11. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1