Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 611

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

changing certain administrative procedures under the tax incremental financing program.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under the current tax incremental financing program, a city or village may

create a tax incremental district (TID) in part of its territory to foster development

if at least 50 percent of the area to be included in the TID is blighted, in need of

rehabilitation or conservation, suitable for industrial sites, or suitable for mixed-use

development. Currently, towns also have a limited ability to create a TID under

certain circumstances. Before a city or village may create a TID, several steps and

plans are required. These steps and plans include public hearings on the proposed

TID within specified time frames, preparation and adoption by the local planning

commission of a proposed project plan for the TID, approval of the proposed project

plan by the common council or village board, approval of the city's or village's

proposed TID by a joint review board that consists of members who represent the

overlying taxation districts, and adoption of a resolution by the common council or

village board that creates the TID as of a date provided in the resolution.

Also under current law, once a TID has been created, the Department of

Revenue (DOR) calculates the "tax incremental base" value of the TID, which is the

equalized value of all taxable property within the TID at the time of its creation. If

the development in the TID increases the value of the property in the TID above the

base value, a "value increment" is created. That portion of taxes collected on the

value increment in excess of the base value is called a "tax increment." The tax

increment is placed in a special fund that may be used only to pay back the project

costs of the TID. The costs of a TID, which are initially incurred by the creating city

or village, include public works such as sewers, streets, and lighting systems;

financing costs; site preparation costs; and professional service costs. DOR

authorizes the allocation of the tax increments until the TID terminates or, generally,

20 years, 23 years, or 27 years after the TID is created, depending on the type of TID

and the year in which it was created. Under certain circumstances, the life of the TID

and the allocation period may be extended.

Under current law, a planning commission may adopt an amendment to a

project plan, which requires the approval of the common council or village board and

the same findings that current law requires for the creation of a TID. Current law

also authorizes the amendment of a project plan up to four times during a TID's

existence to change the district's boundaries by adding or subtracting territory.

Currently, before a TID may be created or its project plan amended, the city or

village must adopt a resolution containing a finding that the equalized value of

taxable property of the TID plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not

exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village

(the "12 percent test"), subject to one exception. Under the exception, a city or village

may simultaneously create a new TID and subtract territory from an existing TID

without adopting a resolution containing the 12 percent test if the city or village

demonstrates to DOR that the value of the territory that is subtracted at least equals

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Berceau (D) , Brooks (R) , Dexter (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Zepnick (D)

5 cosponsors

Erpenbach (D) , Harsdorf (R) , Holperin (D) , Miller (D) , Plale (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 12, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

Passed 7–0 Mar 12, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pope-Roberts, Brooks, Dexter, Zepnick and Berceau;Cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Holperin, Miller, Plale and Harsdorf

  2. Dec 8, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  3. Jan 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Pope-Roberts

  5. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Mar 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by committee on Urban and Local Affairs

  8. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  9. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  10. Mar 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:18 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1