Assembly Bill 619
County, city, town, and village authority to create local elections boards and to regulate the financing of campaigns for county, city, town, and village offices; duties of municipal and county boards of election commissioners; and granting rule-making authority
Topics: County: Elections, County: Ordinance, Elections: Campaign expense, Government Accountability Board, Municipality: Elections, Municipality: Ordinance, Town: Elections, Town: Laws, Village: Elections, Village: Ordinance
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Dec 17, 2009
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed 53 to 44
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Currently, state law regulates the financing of campaigns for both state and local offices. Under current law, neither a county nor a town has authority to regulate the financing of campaigns for local office. A city and a village may have this authority under constitutional home rule powers if the subject of the particular city ordinance is considered to be a "local affair." This bill specifically authorizes a county, city, town, or village to enact ordinances regulating the financing of campaigns for county, city, town, or village office, respectively. An ordinance enacted under the bill becomes effective in the county, city, town, or village after the Government Accountability Board certifies that the ordinance is in compliance with the provisions of this bill. The significant aspects of the authority granted under the bill include the following:
Local regulation of campaign contributions Current law limits the amount of contributions that may be given to and accepted by a candidate for local office. The maximum amount that an individual may contribute to a local campaign is the greater of $250 or one cent times the population of the jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office, but not more than $3,000. The maximum amount that a committee other than a political party committee or legislative campaign committee may contribute to a local campaign is the greater of $200 or three-fourths of one cent times the population of the jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office, but not more than $2,500. Current law also prohibits an individual from contributing an aggregate total of more than $10,000 in a calendar year to all candidates for state and local office. Currently, for the purpose of determining compliance with contribution limitations, a contribution transferred from a conduit is treated as a contribution from the original contributor.
Read the full summary Show less
In addition, current law limits the aggregate amount of contributions that a candidate for local office may accept from all political committees, including political party committees. For candidates for county office in a county with a population of 500,000 or more (currently, Milwaukee County), these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately as follows:
1. County executive, $175,200.
2. County supervisor, $11,200.
3. Other county offices, $70,100.
For candidates for city office in a first class city (currently, Milwaukee), these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately as follows:
1. Mayor, $175,200.
2. City attorney, $105,100.
3. Alderperson, $11,200.
4. Other city offices, $70,100.
For candidates for local office in a jurisdiction with a population of less than 500,000, these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately 65 percent of the greater of $1,075, 53.91 percent of the annual salary for the office, or the product of $32.35 times the population of the jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office.
However, these maximum aggregate amounts may not be more than $28,000.
Furthermore, current law limits the aggregate amount of contributions that a candidate for local office may accept from committees other than political party committees. For candidates for county office in a county with a population of 500,000 or more, these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately as follows:
1. County executive, $121,300.
2. County supervisor, $7,800.
3. Other county offices, $48,500.
For candidates for city office in a first class city (currently, Milwaukee), these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately as follows:
1. Mayor, $121,300.
2. City attorney, $72,800.
3. Alderperson, $7,800.
4. Other city offices, $48,500.
For candidates for local office in a jurisdiction with a population of less than 500,000, these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately 45 percent of the greater of $1,075, 53.91 percent of the annual salary for the office, or the product of $32.35 times the population of the jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office.
However, these maximum aggregate amounts may not be more than $19,400.
This bill permits a county, city, town, or village to enact an ordinance that reasonably limits the making and acceptance of contributions with respect to elections for county, city, town, or village office, respectively. The ordinance may prohibit a candidate or a committee from accepting any contribution made or transferred in violation of the ordinance. In addition, similar to current law, the ordinance may reasonably limit the aggregate amount of contributions that a candidate may accept from committees. Similar to current law, the ordinance may also reasonably limit the amount of contributions that an individual or a committee may make with respect to a particular election and may limit the aggregate amount of contributions that an individual may make in a calendar year with respect to all elections for county, city, town, or village office, as is applicable. An ordinance enacted by a county may exempt from any limitation on contributions created under the ordinance contributions from a political party committee. Unlike current law, however, the maximum amount of allowable individual or committee contributions under the ordinance may be less than the maximum amount allowed under current law. In addition, unlike current law, the ordinance may limit the total amount of contributions that may be transferred by a conduit with respect to elections for county, city, town, or village office.
Local public financing of campaigns for local office This bill permits a county, city, town, or village to enact an ordinance appropriating money to pay for campaign expenses of candidates for county, city, town, or village office, respectively. The ordinance may impose reasonable qualifications that a candidate must meet in order to receive funding under the ordinance. The ordinance also may require a candidate, as a condition of receiving funding under the ordinance, to agree to limit the candidate's contributions to his or her own campaign or the candidate's campaign spending or both.
Enforcement of local campaign finance ordinances Under current law, every city and county with a population of greater than 500,000 must establish a city or county board of election commissioners. The city or county board of election commissioners has general authority to administer elections in the city or county. With certain exceptions, a city or county board of election commissioners must carry out all powers and duties assigned to the municipal or county clerks or the city or county board of canvassers under the election laws.
Current law does not authorize a city or county with a population of 500,000 or less to establish a board of election commissioners.
This bill permits a city or county that enacts a local campaign finance ordinance under the bill and that has a population of 500,000 or less to create a local elections board to enforce the ordinance. In addition, the bill requires a city or county that enacts a local campaign finance ordinance under the bill and that has a population greater than 500,000 to enact an ordinance requiring the city or county board of election commissioners to enforce the local campaign finance ordinance. The ordinance providing for enforcement by either the local elections board or the city or county board of election commissioners may include provisions authorizing the local elections board or the board of election commissioners to do any of the following:
1. Investigate any alleged violation of the local campaign finance ordinance.
2. Receive and hear any verified complaint alleging a violation of the local campaign finance ordinance.
3. Issue subpoenas and administer oaths.
4. Refer any complaint or matter investigated by it to the appropriate prosecuting attorney.
5. Issue a formal opinion, upon request, regarding the application of the local campaign finance ordinance. Under the bill, the person requesting the formal opinion is not subject to prosecution under the ordinance for acting in accordance with the opinion if the material facts are as stated in the opinion.
In addition, the enforcement ordinance may direct the corporation counsel, or the district attorney in a county that does not have a corporation counsel, to provide counsel to a local elections board created by a county or to a county board of election commissioners regarding the administration of a local campaign finance ordinance enacted under the bill. The enforcement ordinance may also require a city, town, or village attorney to provide similar counsel to a city board of election commissioners or to a local elections board created by a city, town, or village, respectively.
Furthermore, the enforcement ordinance may direct the county, city, town, or village clerk to provide administrative support services to the local elections board or city or county board of election commissioners.
Local campaign finance registration and reporting Under current law, with limited exceptions, any candidate for local office and any organization or individual acting in support of or in opposition to any candidate for local office must file a registration statement and various campaign finance reports with the clerk or board of election commissioners in the most populous jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office. This bill allows a county, city, town, or village to enact an ordinance requiring any organization that or individual who takes certain actions regarding the financing of an election for county, city, town, or village office to provide the county, city, town, or village with a copy of of any registration statement or campaign finance report that, under current law, the organization or individual files with another filing officer or agency.
In addition, this bill allows a county, city, town, or village to enact an ordinance requiring electronic filing of any campaign finance reports filed with the county, city, town, or village. This bill requires a county, city, town, or village enacting an electronic filing ordinance to provide an exemption from electronic filing for indigent persons. Currently, registrants who or that must file campaign finance reports with the Government Accountability Board in an electronic format may purchase the necessary computer software from the board. This bill requires the Government Accountability Board also to sell a copy of this software to each registrant who or that must file electronically with a county, city, town, or village.
Who's behind it
9 lawmakers are its . All 9 are Democrats.
4 more lawmakers .
See all 13 names Hide the names
Authors (9)
- Annette Williams · Democrat, Assembly
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Gary Hebl · Democrat, Assembly
- Nick Milroy · Democrat, Assembly
- Joe Parisi · Democrat, Assembly
- Mark Pocan · Democrat, Assembly
- Sondy Pope · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Josh Zepnick · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (4)
- John Lehman · Democrat, Senate
- Mark Miller · Democrat, Senate
- Fred A. Risser · Democrat, Senate
- Jim Sullivan · Democrat, Senate
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Elections and Campaign Reform vote to recommend it
Passed, 4 to 3 · Mar 3, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 53 to 44 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs.
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 53 to 44.
-
Mar 3, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 3, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 4 to 3.
-
Feb 17, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Dec 29, 2009
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Dec 17, 2009
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Elections and Campaign Reform.
-
Dec 17, 2009
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Pocan, Smith, Berceau, Hebl, Milroy, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, A. Williams and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, Lehman, Miller and Sullivan
- Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Elections and Campaign Reform
- Dec 29, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:20 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote