Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 619

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

county, city, town, and village authority to create local elections boards and to regulate the financing of campaigns for county, city, town, and village offices; duties of municipal and county boards of election commissioners; and granting rule-making authority.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Currently, state law regulates the financing of campaigns for both state and

local offices. Under current law, neither a county nor a town has authority to regulate

the financing of campaigns for local office. A city and a village may have this

authority under constitutional home rule powers if the subject of the particular city

ordinance is considered to be a "local affair." This bill specifically authorizes a county,

city, town, or village to enact ordinances regulating the financing of campaigns for

county, city, town, or village office, respectively. An ordinance enacted under the bill

becomes effective in the county, city, town, or village after the Government

Accountability Board certifies that the ordinance is in compliance with the

provisions of this bill. The significant aspects of the authority granted under the bill

include the following:

Local regulation of campaign contributions

Current law limits the amount of contributions that may be given to and

accepted by a candidate for local office. The maximum amount that an individual

may contribute to a local campaign is the greater of $250 or one cent times the

population of the jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office, but not more than

$3,000. The maximum amount that a committee other than a political party

committee or legislative campaign committee may contribute to a local campaign is

the greater of $200 or three-fourths of one cent times the population of the

jurisdiction for which the candidate seeks office, but not more than $2,500. Current

law also prohibits an individual from contributing an aggregate total of more than

$10,000 in a calendar year to all candidates for state and local office. Currently, for

the purpose of determining compliance with contribution limitations, a contribution

transferred from a conduit is treated as a contribution from the original contributor.

In addition, current law limits the aggregate amount of contributions that a

candidate for local office may accept from all political committees, including political

party committees. For candidates for county office in a county with a population of

500,000 or more (currently, Milwaukee County), these maximum aggregate amounts

are approximately as follows:

1. County executive, $175,200.

2. County supervisor, $11,200.

3. Other county offices, $70,100.

For candidates for city office in a first class city (currently, Milwaukee), these

maximum aggregate amounts are approximately as follows:

1. Mayor, $175,200.

2. City attorney, $105,100.

3. Alderperson, $11,200.

4. Other city offices, $70,100.

For candidates for local office in a jurisdiction with a population of less than

500,000, these maximum aggregate amounts are approximately 65 percent of the

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Hebl (D) , Milroy (D) , Parisi (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Smith (D) , Zepnick (D)

4 cosponsors

Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Sullivan (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Mar 3, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

Passed 53–44 Apr 15, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Pocan, Smith, Berceau, Hebl, Milroy, Parisi, Pope-Roberts, A. Williams and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Risser, Lehman, Miller and Sullivan

  2. Dec 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Elections and Campaign Reform

  3. Dec 29, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  7. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:20 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  9. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  10. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  11. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1