Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 627

Admissibility of a digitally produced photograph, film, motion picture, audio, or video and providing a penalty

Topics: Amusement, Court: Procedure, Crime and criminals, Data processing, Evidence, Fraud, Legislature: Criminal Penalties, Joint Review Committee on, Police

Stopped in committee

It had a but no committee vote, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 18, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. It had a hearing but no committee vote.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It sat with the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, if properly authenticated as being a true representation of the image in the photograph or motion picture, an original of a photograph or motion picture may be admitted into evidence to prove the content of the photograph or motion picture. This bill allows the introduction, in a criminal prosecution, of a digital representation of a photograph, film, motion picture, audio, or video that was created by a law enforcement agent for purposes of proving the content of that digital representation only if that content has not been altered and is in a format that includes bits representing a watermark scattered within the file in such a way that they cannot be identified or manipulated and that shows that the digital representation has not been altered from its original representation. Digital representation, as defined in the bill, means any recording or image of a person, place, document, sound, or event that is created or stored by data in the form of numerical digits.

The bill creates a Class A misdemeanor for altering a digital representation with the intent to falsify its contents or for requesting the admission into evidence of a digital representation to prove the contents of that representation if the person knew those contents had been altered.

Read the full summary

Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime, the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to result if the bill is enacted.

Who's behind it

2 representatives are its ⁠. 1 is a Democrat and 1 is a Republican.

See all 2 names

Authors (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 12, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  3. Feb 4, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  4. Jan 26, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Jan 6, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jan 4, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Dec 18, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice.

  8. Dec 18, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Schneider and Bies

  2. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice

  3. Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 6, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider

  7. Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  8. Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  9. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate