Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
admissibility of a digitally produced photograph, film, motion picture, audio, or video and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if properly authenticated as being a true representation of
the image in the photograph or motion picture, an original of a photograph or motion
picture may be admitted into evidence to prove the content of the photograph or
motion picture. This bill allows the introduction, in a criminal prosecution, of a
digital representation of a photograph, film, motion picture, audio, or video that was
created by a law enforcement agent for purposes of proving the content of that digital
representation only if that content has not been altered and is in a format that
includes bits representing a watermark scattered within the file in such a way that
they cannot be identified or manipulated and that shows that the digital
representation has not been altered from its original representation. Digital
representation, as defined in the bill, means any recording or image of a person,
place, document, sound, or event that is created or stored by data in the form of
numerical digits.
The bill creates a Class A misdemeanor for altering a digital representation
with the intent to falsify its contents or for requesting the admission into evidence
of a digital representation to prove the contents of that representation if the person
knew those contents had been altered.
Because this bill creates a new crime or revises a penalty for an existing crime,
the Joint Review Committee on Criminal Penalties may be requested to prepare a
report concerning the proposed penalty and the costs or savings that are likely to
result if the bill is enacted.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Full history
- Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly
- Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 6, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 12, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1