Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 633

Became law Official bill text Atom feed

using county jail funds for costs related to providing educational and medical services to county jail inmates.

  1. Introduced, completed
  2. Passes Assembly, completed
  3. Passes Senate, completed
  4. Governor signs, completed
  5. Law, completed

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, if a person is required to pay a fine or a forfeiture for a

violation of state law or for a violation of a municipal or county ordinance, with

certain exceptions, the person also pays a jail surcharge in the amount of 1 percent

of the fine or forfeiture imposed or $10, whichever is greater. If multiple offenses are

involved, the person pays the jail surcharge on the basis of each fine or forfeiture, and

if a fine or forfeiture is suspended in whole or in part, the person pays a reduced jail

surcharge in proportion to the suspension.

The monies collected from jail surcharges are placed in a county jail fund.

Under current law, counties may make payments for construction, remodeling,

repair, or improvement of county jails from county jail funds.

Under this bill, counties may use county jail funds, in addition to the uses

allowed under current law, to make payments for costs related to providing

educational and medical services to inmates.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Clark (D) , Grigsby (D) , Gunderson (R) , M. Williams (R) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Parisi (D) , Spanbauer (R) , Zepnick (D)

7 cosponsors

Darling (R) , Lassa (D) , Miller (D) , Olsen (R) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Feb 19, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

Passed 5–0 Apr 7, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Clark, Ballweg, Grigsby, Gunderson, Molepske Jr., M. Williams, A. Ott, Spanbauer, Parisi and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Taylor, Darling, Miller, Schultz, Risser and Lassa

  2. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Jan 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Jan 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  7. Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-25-2010 by committee on Rules

  9. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  10. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  11. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  12. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  14. Feb 26, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  15. Mar 1, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations

  16. Mar 17, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  17. Apr 6, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  18. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  19. Apr 7, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  20. Apr 14, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  21. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  22. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  23. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  24. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  25. Apr 15, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  26. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  28. May 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 5-4-2010

  29. May 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 5-7-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 256

  30. May 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-21-2010