Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 637

Regulating chemicals in children's products and granting rule-making authority

Topics: Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Department of, Children: Protection and services, Consumer protection, Industrial development

Stopped in committee

It never got a ⁠, so it never came up for a vote. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Dec 18, 2009

  2. Committee, stopped here

    Stopped here. No public hearing was held.

  3. Assembly vote, not reached

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

It never got a hearing in the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection. See every bill that never got a hearing this session.

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill regulates chemicals used in consumer products intended for use by children and in certain consumer products to which a child or fetus may be exposed (children's products).

Under the bill, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) must identify chemicals known, on the basis of credible scientific evidence, to be capable of causing certain types of harm to a child or fetus (priority chemicals).

Read the full summary

Any person who manufactures or distributes a children's product that contains a priority chemical must provide certain information to DATCP about the product and the use of the priority chemical in the product. The bill imposes deadlines for DATCP's initial identification of priority chemicals and for subsequent updates.

The bill requires DATCP to identify safer alternatives to specific uses of priority chemicals in children's products. A safer alternative, under the bill, generally means a product, process, or material that is functionally equivalent to a chemical in a children's product and that has less potential for harm to human health or to the environment. DATCP must promulgate a rule that imposes a reasonable deadline, not to exceed three years, for a manufacturer or distributor to replace a priority chemical used in a children's products. Within 180 days after DATCP promulgates the rule, a manufacturer or distributor must submit to DATCP a plan for replacing the priority chemical in a children's product with a safer alternative.

The bill permits DATCP to promulgate rules that do any of the following: 1) require a manufacturer or distributor to adopt an alternative to the use of a priority chemical in a children's product that is the least toxic or harmful to the environment of the available alternatives; 2) require a manufacturer or distributor to submit a report to DATCP assessing the availability of safer alternatives; or 3) exempt from the bill's disclosure requirements the manufacturer of a product sold in small quantities.

Under the bill, any person may petition DATCP to determine whether a safer alternative exists to a specific use of a priority chemical in a children's product. The bill provides exemptions for all of the following: 1) the use of a priority chemical for industrial or manufacturing purposes; 2) a motor vehicle or component part of a motor vehicle; 3) combustible fuel or a by-product of a combustible fuel; and 4) a retailer of children's products, unless the retailer knowingly sells a children's product that the retailer reasonably should know contains a priority chemical. The bill also authorizes DATCP to grant an exemption for a specific use of a priority chemical in a children's product if DATCP determines there is no safer alternative to the use of the priority chemical.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 11 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (3)

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Dec 18, 2009

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Consumer Protection.

  3. Dec 18, 2009

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Mason, Roys, Parisi, Turner, Berceau, Hilgenberg, Benedict and Milroy;Cosponsored by Senators Hansen, Taylor and Miller

  2. Dec 18, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Consumer Protection

  3. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Public hearing

A meeting where anyone can speak to a committee about a bill, or send written comments.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor