Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 644

Establishing a presumption for employment-connected communicable diseases for fire fighters, emergency medical service providers, law enforcement officers, and certain correctional employees

Topics: Disease, Fire department, Legislature: Retirement Systems, Joint Survey Committee on, Medical service, Police, Prison

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 4, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, in a proceeding regarding the benefits for a state, county, or municipal fire fighter who dies or is disabled as the result of a heart or respiratory impairment or disease or of cancer, there is a presumption that the impairment or disease was caused by the employment as a fire fighter if the fire fighter served a minimum term in that employment (five years for a heart or respiratory impairment or disease and ten years for cancer) and the qualifying medical examination given before his or her joining the fire department showed no evidence of the impairment or disease.

Under this bill, in a proceeding regarding benefits for a state, county, or municipal fire fighter, emergency medical service provider, law enforcement officer, or correctional officer who dies or is disabled as a result of certain infectious diseases, there is a presumption that the disease was caused by the person's employment as a fire fighter, an emergency medical service provider, a law enforcement officer, or a correctional officer if the person's qualifying medical examination showed no evidence of the disease. The bill does not require a minimum term of employment to qualify for the presumption.

Read the full summary

Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be printed as an appendix to the bill.

Who's behind it

21 representatives are its ⁠. 16 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

6 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 27 names

Authors (21)

Signed on in support (6)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Labor vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 0 · Feb 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Feb 9, 2010

    “Report of joint survey committee on Retirement Systems requested pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(am)” (the official wording)

  3. Feb 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  4. Feb 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 0.

  5. Jan 26, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jan 19, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Jan 13, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  8. Jan 5, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  9. Jan 4, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Labor.

  10. Jan 4, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Bies, Danou, Friske, Hraychuck, Seidel, Young, Van Akkeren, Jorgensen, Parisi, Soletski, Berceau, Vruwink, Mason, Pocan, Van Roy, A. Ott, Steinbrink, Bernard Schaber, Suder and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Sullivan, Coggs, Wirch, Lehman, Robson and Hansen

  2. Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Labor

  3. Jan 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Jan 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  7. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  9. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  10. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report of joint survey committee on Retirement Systems requested pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(am)

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:23 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  13. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote