Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
establishing a presumption for employment-connected communicable diseases for fire fighters, emergency medical service providers, law enforcement officers, and certain correctional employees.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, in a proceeding regarding the benefits for a state, county,
or municipal fire fighter who dies or is disabled as the result of a heart or respiratory
impairment or disease or of cancer, there is a presumption that the impairment or
disease was caused by the employment as a fire fighter if the fire fighter served a
minimum term in that employment (five years for a heart or respiratory impairment
or disease and ten years for cancer) and the qualifying medical examination given
before his or her joining the fire department showed no evidence of the impairment
or disease.
Under this bill, in a proceeding regarding benefits for a state, county, or
municipal fire fighter, emergency medical service provider, law enforcement officer,
or correctional officer who dies or is disabled as a result of certain infectious diseases,
there is a presumption that the disease was caused by the person's employment as
a fire fighter, an emergency medical service provider, a law enforcement officer, or
a correctional officer if the person's qualifying medical examination showed no
evidence of the disease. The bill does not require a minimum term of employment
to qualify for the presumption.
Because this bill relates to public employee retirement or pensions, it may be
referred to the Joint Survey Committee on Retirement Systems for a report to be
printed as an appendix to the bill.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Berceau (D) , Bernard Schaber (D) , Bies (R) , Danou (D) , Friske (R) , Hraychuck (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Mason (D) , Parisi (D) , Pocan (D) , Seidel (D) , Sinicki (D) , Soletski (D) , Steinbrink (D) , Suder (R) , Van Akkeren (D) , Van Roy (R) , Vruwink (D) , Young (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Feb 9, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Sinicki, Bies, Danou, Friske, Hraychuck, Seidel, Young, Van Akkeren, Jorgensen, Parisi, Soletski, Berceau, Vruwink, Mason, Pocan, Van Roy, A. Ott, Steinbrink, Bernard Schaber, Suder and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Sullivan, Coggs, Wirch, Lehman, Robson and Hansen
- Jan 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Labor
- Jan 5, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 13, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 19, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 26, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Labor, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report of joint survey committee on Retirement Systems requested pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(am)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:23 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1