Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 65

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

public financing of campaigns for the office of justice of the supreme court, making appropriations, and providing penalties.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes numerous changes in the campaign finance law affecting

campaigns for the office of justice of the supreme court. The bill limits the application

of the Wisconsin election campaign fund, under which eligible candidates for certain

state offices (including justice of the supreme court) may currently receive public

grants from state general purpose revenues derived from designations made by

individuals filing state income tax returns, to state offices other than the office of

justice. To finance elections for the office of justice of the supreme court, the bill

creates a democracy trust fund under which eligible candidates for this office may

receive public grants derived from general purpose revenues.

Under the bill, a candidate for the office of justice of the supreme court may

qualify for public financing from the democracy trust fund to finance a campaign in

a primary or election by receiving qualifying contributions from at least 1,000

separate contributors who are electors of this state in amounts of not less than $5 nor

more than $100 in an aggregate amount of at least $5,000 but not more than $15,000.

A candidate who accepts public financing may also accept "seed money"

contributions from electors of this state in amounts of $100 or less, subject to

aggregate limitations, and may contribute personal funds in specified amounts

during specified periods. In order to qualify for a public financing benefit for the

primary, a candidate at the spring primary must have an opponent who qualifies to

have his or her name appear on the ballot at the primary, and in order to qualify for

a public financing benefit for the spring election, a candidate at the election must

have an opponent who qualifies to have his or her name appear on the ballot at the

election. A candidate who accepts a public financing benefit may not accept any

contributions other than qualifying and seed money contributions and contributions

from personal funds within the limitations permitted. Public financing benefits for

eligible candidates are $100,000 in the spring primary and $300,000 in the spring

election. The benefits are subject to a biennial cost of living adjustment. A candidate

who accepts more than a specified amount of qualifying or seed money contributions

has the excess deducted from his or her public financing benefit. In addition, if a

candidate's opponent declines to accept a public financing benefit and makes

expenditures in a total amount that exceeds by more than 5 percent the amount

permitted for a candidate who accepts a public financing benefit, the candidate who

accepts a public financing benefit receives additional funding equivalent to the

excess expenditures made by his or her opponent, but may not receive more than

three times the amount of the public financing benefit for the office that the

candidate seeks. A candidate also receives additional public financing equivalent to

any independent expenditures made against the candidate or in support of his or her

opponents if those expenditures exceed by more than 20 percent the amount of the

public financing benefit for the office that the candidate seeks, but may not receive

more than three times the amount of that benefit.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Black (D) , Clark (D) , Cullen (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hintz (D) , Hubler (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Parisi (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Shilling , Smith (D) , Staskunas (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)

13 cosponsors

Ellis (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Kreitlow (D) , Lassa (D) , Lehman (D) , Miller (D) , Risser (D) , Schultz (R) , Sullivan (D) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D) , Wirch (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3

Passed 4–3 Oct 21, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

Passed 15–0 Nov 3, 2009 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hintz, Hilgenberg, Smith, Garthwaite, Benedict, Roys, Hebl, Staskunas, Turner, Parisi, Cullen, Jorgensen, Richards, Zepnick, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Clark, Shilling, Hubler, Black, Berceau, Grigsby, Molepske Jr. and Kessler;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Taylor, Lehman, Erpenbach, Miller, Risser, Lassa, Hansen, Wirch, Vinehout, Schultz and Sullivan

  2. Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Elections and Campaign Reform

  3. Feb 23, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 25, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Apr 13, 2009 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  6. May 27, 2009 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  7. Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly

    Senator Ellis added as a cosponsor

  9. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3

  10. Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  11. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  12. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance

  13. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance

  14. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by joint committee on Finance

  15. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by joint committee on Finance

  16. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  17. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  18. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  19. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 4 adotion recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  20. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4

  21. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  22. Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Rules

  23. Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  24. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1