Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
public financing of campaigns for the office of justice of the supreme court, making appropriations, and providing penalties.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes numerous changes in the campaign finance law affecting
campaigns for the office of justice of the supreme court. The bill limits the application
of the Wisconsin election campaign fund, under which eligible candidates for certain
state offices (including justice of the supreme court) may currently receive public
grants from state general purpose revenues derived from designations made by
individuals filing state income tax returns, to state offices other than the office of
justice. To finance elections for the office of justice of the supreme court, the bill
creates a democracy trust fund under which eligible candidates for this office may
receive public grants derived from general purpose revenues.
Under the bill, a candidate for the office of justice of the supreme court may
qualify for public financing from the democracy trust fund to finance a campaign in
a primary or election by receiving qualifying contributions from at least 1,000
separate contributors who are electors of this state in amounts of not less than $5 nor
more than $100 in an aggregate amount of at least $5,000 but not more than $15,000.
A candidate who accepts public financing may also accept "seed money"
contributions from electors of this state in amounts of $100 or less, subject to
aggregate limitations, and may contribute personal funds in specified amounts
during specified periods. In order to qualify for a public financing benefit for the
primary, a candidate at the spring primary must have an opponent who qualifies to
have his or her name appear on the ballot at the primary, and in order to qualify for
a public financing benefit for the spring election, a candidate at the election must
have an opponent who qualifies to have his or her name appear on the ballot at the
election. A candidate who accepts a public financing benefit may not accept any
contributions other than qualifying and seed money contributions and contributions
from personal funds within the limitations permitted. Public financing benefits for
eligible candidates are $100,000 in the spring primary and $300,000 in the spring
election. The benefits are subject to a biennial cost of living adjustment. A candidate
who accepts more than a specified amount of qualifying or seed money contributions
has the excess deducted from his or her public financing benefit. In addition, if a
candidate's opponent declines to accept a public financing benefit and makes
expenditures in a total amount that exceeds by more than 5 percent the amount
permitted for a candidate who accepts a public financing benefit, the candidate who
accepts a public financing benefit receives additional funding equivalent to the
excess expenditures made by his or her opponent, but may not receive more than
three times the amount of the public financing benefit for the office that the
candidate seeks. A candidate also receives additional public financing equivalent to
any independent expenditures made against the candidate or in support of his or her
opponents if those expenditures exceed by more than 20 percent the amount of the
public financing benefit for the office that the candidate seeks, but may not receive
more than three times the amount of that benefit.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: Benedict (D) , Berceau (D) , Black (D) , Clark (D) , Cullen (D) , Garthwaite (D) , Grigsby (D) , Hebl (D) , Hilgenberg (D) , Hintz (D) , Hubler (D) , Jorgensen (D) , Kessler (D) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Parisi (D) , Pocan (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Richards (D) , Roys (D) , Shilling , Smith (D) , Staskunas (D) , Turner (D) , Zepnick (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3
Passed 4–3 Oct 21, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
Passed 15–0 Nov 3, 2009 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hintz, Hilgenberg, Smith, Garthwaite, Benedict, Roys, Hebl, Staskunas, Turner, Parisi, Cullen, Jorgensen, Richards, Zepnick, Pocan, Pope-Roberts, Clark, Shilling, Hubler, Black, Berceau, Grigsby, Molepske Jr. and Kessler;Cosponsored by Senators Kreitlow, Taylor, Lehman, Erpenbach, Miller, Risser, Lassa, Hansen, Wirch, Vinehout, Schultz and Sullivan
- Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Elections and Campaign Reform
- Feb 23, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- May 27, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jun 16, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Sep 30, 2009 · Assembly
Senator Ellis added as a cosponsor
- Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Elections and Campaign Reform, Ayes 4, Noes 3
- Oct 21, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to joint committee on Finance
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by joint committee on Finance
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 4 adotion recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 11, Noes 4
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Nov 3, 2009 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 11-5-2009 by committee on Rules
- Nov 5, 2009 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1