Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 659

HIV testing, disclosure of HIV test results, and providing penalties

Topics: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Damage (personal injury), Fines, Good Samaritan, Health Services, Department of: Health, Nurses, Physician, Privacy, Public health, Youth

Became law

The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's ⁠.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 20, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Feb 16, 2010

  4. Senate vote, passed

    Passed Apr 13, 2010

  5. Governor, passed

    Signed

  6. Law, here now

    2009 Wisconsin Act 209

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it does

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, a person generally may not be subjected to a test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) unless he or she consents to the test. The results of an HIV test are generally confidential and may not be disclosed unless the test subject authorizes disclosure. Current law specifies certain circumstances under which another person may provide consent for HIV testing of an individual and disclosure of HIV test results. For example, if a person has designated a health care agent and has been found to be incapacitated, the person's health care agent may provide consent for HIV testing and disclosure of the test results. In addition, a parent may consent to HIV testing and disclosure of test results on behalf of a minor who is less than 14 years of age.

Current law provides several exceptions to the consent requirement for HIV testing. The exception for cases of so-called "significant exposure" provides that if a person working in certain occupations such as health care, corrections, or education, is exposed to the body fluid of an another individual under circumstances that may allow for transmission of HIV, and a health care provider certifies that a significant exposure occurred, the person may have the individual tested for HIV without the individual's consent. If the individual is tested, the person who requested the test may obtain the results of the test. The individual may be informed of his or her own test results only if he or she consents to being informed.

Read the full summary

Current law provides a number of additional exceptions to confidentiality of HIV test results. For example, under certain circumstances HIV test results may be disclosed without the test subject's consent to a health care provider, a jailer or corrections employee, a foster parent, and a victim of sexual assault, among others.

Current law specifies that if consent is required for HIV testing, it must be provided in writing on a form that includes an explanation regarding permitted disclosure of HIV test results. Authorization for disclosure of test results must also be provided in writing.

Current law also provides that a health care provider, blood bank, or blood or plasma center that performs an HIV test, must report positive HIV test results to the state epidemiologist. Current law allows a health care provider who has a record of an individual's positive HIV test results to report to the state epidemiologist the name of any person who had significant exposure to the test subject.

Current law provides a criminal penalty for intentionally violating prohibitions against disclosing HIV test results without the test subject's consent. Current law also allows civil damages for violating the prohibitions against disclosure and for violating consent requirements for HIV testing.

This bill changes the consent provisions for HIV testing. Under the bill, the following conditions must be satisfied before a health care provider, blood bank, blood center, or plasma center (test administrator) may perform an HIV test on a person: 1) the test administrator must notify the person that the person may decline to have the test performed and that the test will be performed unless the person declines; 2) the test administrator must offer the person certain information about HIV, HIV test results, reporting of test results, treatment options for HIV, and AIDS service organizations and the services they provide; 3) the test administrator must provide the person an opportunity to ask questions and to decline the test; 4) and the test administrator must verify that the person understands that a test will be performed and that the person's decision regarding testing is not coerced or involuntary. In addition, the bill provides that a health care provider may not deny treatment or services to a person who declines to have an HIV test performed, and requires a health care provider that administers HIV tests to notify potential HIV test subjects of this prohibition against denying treatment or services. The bill further provides that a health care provider may not require a person to authorize disclosure of HIV test results as a condition of administering an HIV test to the person. The bill eliminates the requirement that consent for an HIV test must be in writing. The bill requires the Department of Health Services to provide test administrators materials that include the information and notices that test administrators must provide or offer to potential test subjects.

Other changes in the bill include the following:

1. The bill specifies elements that must be included in an authorization to disclose HIV test results, including the name and signature of the person who authorizes the disclosure, specification of what information may be disclosed, the name of the person to whom the information may be disclosed, and the period in which disclosure is permitted.

2. The bill eliminates the condition that an individual who is tested for HIV in a case of significant exposure consent to being informed of his or her or test results before he or she may be notified of the test results.

3. The bill provides that a good samaritan who renders aid to an accident victim and has a significant exposure to body fluid of the victim may cause the victim to be tested for HIV without the victim's consent.

4. The bill specifies that if a minor is at least 14 years of age, the minor, and not his or her parent, has authority to consent to or decline an HIV test and authorize disclosure of his or her HIV test results.

5. The bill provides that a physician assistant has the same authority as a physician and certain nurses to certify that a significant exposure has occurred for purposes of requiring HIV testing without consent, to disclose to the state epidemiologist the name of a person who may have had a significant exposure to a person who has tested positive for HIV, to administer certain court-ordered HIV tests, and to receive certain HIV test results.

6. The bill provides that when a health care provider, blood bank, or blood or plasma center reports a positive HIV test result to the state epidemiologist, the report must include the mode of HIV transmission.

7. The bill increases the criminal fine and civil damages amounts for violating prohibitions against disclosing HIV test results without consent and increases the civil damages amounts for violating consent requirements for HIV testing.

8. The bill requires the Department of Heath Services to designate AIDS service organizations, which are defined in the bill as nonprofit corporations or public agencies that provide, or arrange for the provision of, comprehensive services to prevent HIV infection and comprehensive health and social services for persons who have an HIV infection.

9. The bill eliminates a state law requirement for HIV testing of sperm and ova that are donated as anatomical gifts. Federal law requires HIV testing of all donated sperm and ova.

10. The bill makes numerous changes that modernize and simplify references to HIV tests and reorganizes provisions relating to HIV testing and disclosure of HIV test results.

Who's behind it

9 lawmakers are its ⁠. 8 are Democrats. 1 has no party on record.

3 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 12 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (3)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 0 · Feb 5, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Senate Committee on Health vote to recommend it

Passed, 7 to 0 · Mar 19, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 27, 2010

    The new law was published.

  2. Apr 22, 2010

    The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 209.

  3. Apr 20, 2010

    Sent to the governor.

  4. Apr 13, 2010

    The Senate passed it too.

  5. Mar 19, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 7 to 0.

  6. Mar 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 18, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  8. Feb 17, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  9. Feb 16, 2010

    The Assembly passed it.

  10. Feb 16, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  11. Feb 5, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  12. Feb 5, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  13. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  14. Jan 25, 2010

    1 more representative signed on in support.

  15. Jan 20, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  16. Jan 20, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Shilling, Richards, Benedict, Berceau, Hebl, Pasch, Sinicki, Turner and Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senators Robson and Taylor

  2. Jan 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  3. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Representative A. Williams added as a coauthor

  4. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  6. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Shilling

  7. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  9. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  10. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 by committee on Rules

  12. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  15. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  16. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed

  17. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  18. Feb 17, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  19. Feb 18, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  20. Mar 3, 2010 · Senate

    Public hearing held

  21. Mar 16, 2010 · Senate

    Executive action taken

  22. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Report concurrence recommended by committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue, Ayes 7, Noes 0

  23. Mar 19, 2010 · Senate

    Available for scheduling

  24. Apr 8, 2010 · Senate

    Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)

  25. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a second time

  26. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 offered by Senator Grothman

  27. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Senate amendment 1 rejected

  28. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Rules suspended

  30. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Read a third time and concurred in

  31. Apr 13, 2010 · Senate

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction

  33. Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly

    Received from Senate concurred in

  34. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Report correctly enrolled

  35. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010

  36. Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 209

  37. Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Published 5-5-2010

Terms on this page

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Wisconsin Act

The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.

Official term: Act

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote