Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 663

Restricting access to and limiting information contained in the Consolidated Court Automation Programs and providing a penalty

Topics: Attorney, Court, Data processing, Debt and debtors, Discrimination in employment, Discrimination in housing, Judge, Newspaper and magazine, Police, Public employee, State Courts, Director of

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, the director of state courts established a consolidated electronic system. This system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP), contains information about civil and criminal cases filed in the circuit courts in this state, including information about the parties and their attorneys; documents filed; and deadlines, decisions, and outcomes of cases. CCAP also contains information on family court proceedings; probate proceedings; John Doe proceedings; reviews of certain administrative proceedings; tax warrants;

mechanics', construction, condominium, or other types of liens; civil lawsuits;

Read the full summary

eviction proceedings; and domestic violence and other restraining orders and injunctions.

The information on CCAP is available for free on an Internet Web site. The Web site has no limitations on who has access to the information, although information in certain types of cases is not available to the public. CCAP allows a user to search for all civil and criminal cases in which a person or entity, who is the subject of the search, has been a party.

Currently, the initial CCAP Web page for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case contains the following statements: 1) for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case, a statement that employers may not discriminate against persons because of arrest and conviction records, except in certain circumstances; 2) for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case that did not result in a conviction or forfeiture, a statement that the charges were not proven and have no legal effect, and that the defendant is presumed innocent; and 3) for each traffic or other civil forfeiture case in which a forfeiture but no criminal conviction was imposed, a statement that the charge or charges in the case are not criminal offenses.

Under this bill, the director of state courts maintains a database that is accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page and that provides case information only after a court has done one of the following: 1) makes a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal charge; 2) makes a finding that a person is liable in a civil matter; 3) orders a person to be evicted; or 4) issues a restraining order or injunction against the person.

Under the bill, the director of state courts maintains a separate database that contains public records of circuit courts and that is accessible on the CCAP Web page to judges, court commissioners, and other court or state and local agency employees, law enforcement officers and employees of law enforcement agencies, lawyers, accredited journalists, and licensed debt collectors.

Under the bill, the director of state courts removes from the database that is accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page all information relating to a case if a finding or order related to the case or charge is reopened, vacated, set aside, or overturned on appeal.

Under the bill, if a user searches for a person's name on CCAP and subsequently denies the person employment, housing, or another public accommodation, the user must inform the person that he or she searched for the person's record on CCAP. A user who fails to do so may be fined $1,000.

Also under the bill, upon the written request of a person whose case information is currently available on CCAP, the director of state courts must remove from the database that is accessible on CCAP to the general public any information relating to a case if there was no finding of criminal guilt or civil liability, an order of eviction, or the issuance of a restraining order against the person or if the finding or order was subsequently reopened, vacated, set aside, or overturned.

Who's behind it

4 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 4 are Democrats.

See all 4 names

Authors (4)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security vote on an amendment

Passed, 6 to 0 · Apr 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Feb 3, 2010

    The committee voted on it.

  4. Jan 27, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Jan 27, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security.

  7. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Schneider, Roys, A. Williams and Kessler

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security

  3. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider

  4. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Schneider

  7. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  8. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0

  9. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 4, Noes 2

  10. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report without recommendation by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security (Assembly Rule 19)

  11. Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote