Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
restricting access to and limiting information contained in the Consolidated Court Automation Programs and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the director of state courts established a consolidated
electronic system. This system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation
Programs (CCAP), contains information about civil and criminal cases filed in the
circuit courts in this state, including information about the parties and their
attorneys; documents filed; and deadlines, decisions, and outcomes of cases. CCAP
also contains information on family court proceedings; probate proceedings; John
Doe proceedings; reviews of certain administrative proceedings; tax warrants;
mechanics', construction, condominium, or other types of liens; civil lawsuits;
eviction proceedings; and domestic violence and other restraining orders and
injunctions.
The information on CCAP is available for free on an Internet Web site. The Web
site has no limitations on who has access to the information, although information
in certain types of cases is not available to the public. CCAP allows a user to search
for all civil and criminal cases in which a person or entity, who is the subject of the
search, has been a party.
Currently, the initial CCAP Web page for each criminal and traffic or other civil
forfeiture case contains the following statements: 1) for each criminal and traffic or
other civil forfeiture case, a statement that employers may not discriminate against
persons because of arrest and conviction records, except in certain circumstances; 2)
for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case that did not result in a
conviction or forfeiture, a statement that the charges were not proven and have no
legal effect, and that the defendant is presumed innocent; and 3) for each traffic or
other civil forfeiture case in which a forfeiture but no criminal conviction was
imposed, a statement that the charge or charges in the case are not criminal offenses.
Under this bill, the director of state courts maintains a database that is
accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page and that provides case
information only after a court has done one of the following: 1) makes a finding that
a person is guilty of a criminal charge; 2) makes a finding that a person is liable in
a civil matter; 3) orders a person to be evicted; or 4) issues a restraining order or
injunction against the person.
Under the bill, the director of state courts maintains a separate database that
contains public records of circuit courts and that is accessible on the CCAP Web page
to judges, court commissioners, and other court or state and local agency employees,
law enforcement officers and employees of law enforcement agencies, lawyers,
accredited journalists, and licensed debt collectors.
Under the bill, the director of state courts removes from the database that is
accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page all information relating to a
case if a finding or order related to the case or charge is reopened, vacated, set aside,
or overturned on appeal.
Under the bill, if a user searches for a person's name on CCAP and subsequently
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Kessler (D) , Roys (D) , Schneider (D)
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0
Passed 6–0 Apr 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Schneider, Roys, A. Williams and Kessler
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Schneider
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report without recommendation by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security (Assembly Rule 19)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1