Assembly Bill 663
Restricting access to and limiting information contained in the Consolidated Court Automation Programs and providing a penalty
Topics: Attorney, Court, Data processing, Debt and debtors, Discrimination in employment, Discrimination in housing, Judge, Newspaper and magazine, Police, Public employee, State Courts, Director of
Stopped before the full Assembly voted
The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 22, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.
-
Senate vote, not reached
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, the director of state courts established a consolidated electronic system. This system, known as the Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP), contains information about civil and criminal cases filed in the circuit courts in this state, including information about the parties and their attorneys; documents filed; and deadlines, decisions, and outcomes of cases. CCAP also contains information on family court proceedings; probate proceedings; John Doe proceedings; reviews of certain administrative proceedings; tax warrants;
mechanics', construction, condominium, or other types of liens; civil lawsuits;
Read the full summary Show less
eviction proceedings; and domestic violence and other restraining orders and injunctions.
The information on CCAP is available for free on an Internet Web site. The Web site has no limitations on who has access to the information, although information in certain types of cases is not available to the public. CCAP allows a user to search for all civil and criminal cases in which a person or entity, who is the subject of the search, has been a party.
Currently, the initial CCAP Web page for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case contains the following statements: 1) for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case, a statement that employers may not discriminate against persons because of arrest and conviction records, except in certain circumstances; 2) for each criminal and traffic or other civil forfeiture case that did not result in a conviction or forfeiture, a statement that the charges were not proven and have no legal effect, and that the defendant is presumed innocent; and 3) for each traffic or other civil forfeiture case in which a forfeiture but no criminal conviction was imposed, a statement that the charge or charges in the case are not criminal offenses.
Under this bill, the director of state courts maintains a database that is accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page and that provides case information only after a court has done one of the following: 1) makes a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal charge; 2) makes a finding that a person is liable in a civil matter; 3) orders a person to be evicted; or 4) issues a restraining order or injunction against the person.
Under the bill, the director of state courts maintains a separate database that contains public records of circuit courts and that is accessible on the CCAP Web page to judges, court commissioners, and other court or state and local agency employees, law enforcement officers and employees of law enforcement agencies, lawyers, accredited journalists, and licensed debt collectors.
Under the bill, the director of state courts removes from the database that is accessible to the general public on the CCAP Web page all information relating to a case if a finding or order related to the case or charge is reopened, vacated, set aside, or overturned on appeal.
Under the bill, if a user searches for a person's name on CCAP and subsequently denies the person employment, housing, or another public accommodation, the user must inform the person that he or she searched for the person's record on CCAP. A user who fails to do so may be fined $1,000.
Also under the bill, upon the written request of a person whose case information is currently available on CCAP, the director of state courts must remove from the database that is accessible on CCAP to the general public any information relating to a case if there was no finding of criminal guilt or civil liability, an order of eviction, or the issuance of a restraining order against the person or if the finding or order was subsequently reopened, vacated, set aside, or overturned.
Who's behind it
4 lawmakers are its . All 4 are Democrats.
See all 4 names Hide the names
Authors (4)
- Annette Williams · Democrat, Assembly
- Frederick Kessler · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Marlin Schneider · Democrat, Assembly
What it would cost
State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There was one vote on this bill.
Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security vote on an amendment
Passed, 6 to 0 · Apr 16, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 3, 2010
The committee voted on it.
-
Jan 27, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 27, 2010
A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Schneider, Roys, A. Williams and Kessler
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Schneider
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Schneider
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 6, Noes 0
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security, Ayes 4, Noes 2
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report without recommendation by committee on State Affairs and Homeland Security (Assembly Rule 19)
- Apr 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Committee
A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Cost estimate
A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.
Official term: Fiscal estimate
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote