Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 666

Special distinguishing registration plates supporting motorcycle safety and making appropriations

Topics: Motor vehicle: Taxation or registration, Motorcycle, Organization, Miscellaneous, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Under current law, any group or organization may apply to the Department of Transportation (DOT) for designation as an authorized special group. If the application is approved, members of the authorized special group may obtain special distinguishing registration plates for certain vehicles, including automobiles and motor homes, that are owned or leased by special group members. A fee, in addition to the regular registration fee for the particular kind of vehicle, is charged for the issuance or reissuance of most special plates.

Before October 2, 1998, authorized special groups whose members may obtain special plates were specifically enumerated in state law. With certain exceptions, current law provides that specific enumeration in state law of authorized special groups is limited to those special groups enumerated before October 2, 1998.

Read the full summary

This bill establishes an authorized special group specifically enumerated in state law for persons interested in supporting motorcycle safety. In addition to the regular vehicle registration fee, special group members are required to pay a $15 fee for issuance or reissuance of the special plates and an additional $25 annual fee that, after paying applicable licensing fees, provides funds for the following activities under the Type 1 motorcycle, moped, and motor bicycle safety program administered by DOT: evaluation of basic rider education courses; conducting public workshops, rallies, and programs related to Type 1 motorcycle safety and training; and making grants for providing motorcycle riding courses. The bill requires these plates to display the words "share the road" and a logo associated with Harley-Davidson, Inc.

The plates may not be issued until after DOT has obtained licensing rights for this logo.

Who's behind it

9 representatives are its ⁠. 6 are Democrats, 2 are Republicans and 1 is a Independent.

8 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 17 names

Authors (9)

Signed on in support (8)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 2 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 0 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Joint Committee on Finance vote on an amendment

Passed, 15 to 0 · Apr 9, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 9, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.

  4. Apr 2, 2010

    Sent to the Joint Committee on Finance.

  5. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 10 to 0.

  6. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  7. Feb 19, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  8. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  9. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Vruwink, Honadel, Ziegelbauer, Sinicki, Turner, Fields, Schneider, Zepnick and A. Ott;Cosponsored by Senators Sullivan, Lehman, Taylor, Olsen, Schultz, Hansen, Wirch and Plale

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Transportation

  7. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  8. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 0

  9. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to joint committee on Finance

  10. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by joint committee on Finance

  12. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  13. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  14. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by joint committee on Finance, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  15. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  16. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote