Assembly Bill 670
Requiring sellers of residential real property to disclose whether the property is subject to a shoreland zoning mitigation plan
Topics: Real property, Shoreland zoning
Became law
The governor signed it on Apr 22, 2010. It's .
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 22, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Feb 16, 2010
-
Senate vote, passed
Passed Apr 13, 2010
-
Governor, passed
Signed
-
Law, here now
2009 Wisconsin Act 211
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 27, 2010: “Published 5-5-2010”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it does
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Under current law, a county must enact a shoreland zoning ordinance for shorelands in its unincorporated area. Current law defines a shoreland as an area within a certain distance from the edge of a navigable water. If a county does not enact a shoreland zoning ordinance or if the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) determines that the county has enacted an ordinance that fails to meet certain standards specified in rules promulgated by DNR, then DNR must adopt a shoreland zoning ordinance for the county. Under rules promulgated by DNR, a county ordinance may authorize a structure that was lawfully placed when constructed, but that no longer complies with certain shoreland zoning standards, to be expanded, replaced, or relocated if certain requirements are met. Among those requirements is a requirement that the county issue a permit requiring that a mitigation plan be approved by the county and implemented by the property owner. The mitigation plan must require the property owner to establish or maintain measures that the county determines are adequate to offset the impacts of the building expansion on water quality, aquatic and wildlife habitat, and natural scenic beauty. The obligations of the property owner under the mitigation plan must be evidenced by an instrument recorded in the office of the register of deeds.
Also under current law, with certain exceptions, owners selling residential real property must give prospective buyers a form, known as a real estate condition report, on which the owner discloses certain conditions of the real property of which the owner is aware. This bill requires an owner to disclose on the real estate condition report whether the real property is subject to a mitigation plan required by the county.
Who's behind it
Spencer Black, a Democrat, is its .
1 more lawmaker .
See all 2 names Hide the names
Author (1)
- Spencer Black · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (1)
- Jim Holperin · Democrat, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 2 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Natural Resources vote on an amendment
Passed, 15 to 0 · Feb 5, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Senate Committee on Environment vote to recommend it
Passed, 5 to 0 · Mar 24, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report concurrence recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 27, 2010
The new law was published.
-
Apr 22, 2010
The governor signed it. It became 2009 Wisconsin Act 211.
-
Apr 20, 2010
Sent to the governor.
-
Apr 13, 2010
The Senate passed it too.
-
Mar 24, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 5 to 0.
-
Mar 16, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Feb 18, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Environment.
-
Feb 17, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Feb 16, 2010
The Assembly passed it.
-
Feb 16, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Feb 5, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Feb 5, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 15 to 0.
-
Jan 27, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Black;Cosponsored by Senator Holperin
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Natural Resources
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Jan 27, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Natural Resources
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Natural Resources, Ayes 15, Noes 0
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 2-16-2010 by committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Feb 17, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Feb 18, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Environment
- Mar 16, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Mar 23, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Environment, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Mar 24, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 8, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 13, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 4-20-2010
- Apr 22, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 4-21-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 211
- Apr 27, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-5-2010
Terms on this page
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Wisconsin Act
The number a bill gets when it becomes law, like 2025 Wisconsin Act 12.
Official term: Act
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote