Assembly Bill 675
Hospital staff privileges for and written agreements required for nurse-midwives and allowing nurse-midwives to elect to be covered under the injured patients and families compensation fund
Topics: Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Medical service, Physician
Passed the Assembly, then stopped
The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to . To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.
-
Introduced, passed
Jan 22, 2010
-
Committee, passed
Approved
-
Assembly vote, passed
Passed Apr 15, 2010
-
Senate vote, stopped here
Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.
-
Governor, not reached
-
Law, not reached
Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ”
Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
What it would have done
Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.
Practice of nurse-midwifery Under current law, to practice nurse-midwifery a licensed nurse-midwife must collaborate with and enter into a written agreement with a physician who has postgraduate training in obstetrics. If a person practicing nurse-midwifery discovers evidence of any aspect of care that jeopardizes the health or life of a newborn or mother, the nurse-midwife must either consult with the collaborating physician with whom the nurse-midwife has entered into a written agreement or make a referral as specified in the written agreement.
This bill eliminates the requirement that a licensed nurse-midwife collaborate with and enter into a written agreement with a physician. If a person practicing nurse-midwifery discovers evidence of any aspect of care that jeopardizes the health or life of a newborn or mother, a licensed nurse-midwife must consult with a qualified health care professional or make a referral. The bill defines a qualified health care professional as a health care practitioner who is performing services within his or her scope of practice. A health care practitioner is defined under current law to include an individual who is licensed, registered, or certified by the medical examining board, the board of nursing, and the pharmacy examining board.
Read the full summary Show less
Health care liability coverage Under the health care liability statutes in current law, certain health care providers must carry health care liability insurance with specified limits and pay assessments to the injured patients and families compensation fund (fund). Certain other health care providers may elect to be subject to the health care liability statutes, including the insurance and assessment requirements. If a medical malpractice claim is made against a health care provider who is subject to the health care liability statutes, or against an employee of such a health care provider, the portion of the claim that exceeds the limits of the provider's health care liability insurance is paid on behalf of the provider or provider's employee by the fund.
However, certain employees, called health care practitioners, who are providing services not in collaboration with a physician or under the direction and supervision of a physician or nurse anesthetist, are not covered by the fund as employees in the event that a medical malpractice claim is made against them. Nurse-midwives are not required to provide services under the direction and supervision of a physician or nurse anesthetist and since, under the bill, they are no longer required to provide services in collaboration with a physician, they would not be covered by the fund as employees. Therefore, the bill modifies the definition of a health care practitioner to exclude nurse-midwives so that a nurse-midwife is covered by the fund, as under current law, if he or she is providing services as an employee of a health care provider who is subject to the health care liability statutes.
In addition, the bill authorizes nurse-midwives to elect to be subject to the health care liability statutes. If a nurse-midwife elects to be subject to those statutes, the nurse-midwife would be required to carry health care liability insurance with the specified limits, would be required to pay the assessments, and, even if not an employee of a health care provider subject to the health care liability statutes, would be covered by the fund for damages exceeding the limits of the insurance.
Hospital staff privileges Under current law, only a physician, dentist, or podiatrist may admit a patient to a hospital. The bill provides that a hospital may grant to nurse-midwives who are covered under the fund any hospital staff privileges that the hospital must afford to persons who are licensed to practice medicine or podiatry, including hospital staff privileges to admit, treat, and discharge patients for whom nurse-midwives are qualified to provide care.
Who's behind it
8 lawmakers are its . All 8 are Democrats.
2 more lawmakers .
See all 10 names Hide the names
Authors (8)
- Terese Berceau · Democrat, Assembly
- Sandy Pasch · Democrat, Assembly
- Kelda Roys · Democrat, Senate
- Christine Sinicki · Democrat, Assembly
- Jeff Smith · Democrat, Senate
- Robert Turner · Democrat, Assembly
- Amy Sue Vruwink · Democrat, Assembly
- Leon Young · Democrat, Assembly
Signed on in support (2)
- Judy Robson · Democrat, Senate
- Kathleen Vinehout · Democrat, Senate
Versions and amendments
Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.
How lawmakers voted
There were 3 votes on this bill.
Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote on an amendment
Passed, 10 to 2 · Mar 11, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote on an amendment
Passed, 53 to 44 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page
Assembly vote to pass it
Passed, 82 to 15 · Apr 15, 2010
No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 82, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page
What happened
-
Apr 28, 2010
The session ended, and the bill died with it.
-
Apr 16, 2010
Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.
-
Apr 16, 2010
The Senate received it.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly passed it, 82 to 15.
-
Apr 15, 2010
The Assembly adopted it.
-
Mar 11, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.
-
Mar 11, 2010
The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 3.
-
Feb 3, 2010
The committee held a public hearing.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.
-
Jan 22, 2010
Introduced in the Assembly.
See the official record, word for word Hide the official record
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Roys, Smith, Berceau, Pasch, Sinicki, Turner, Vruwink and Young;Cosponsored by Senators Robson and Vinehout
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform
- Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 3
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:28 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Vukmir and Nygren
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 82, Noes 15
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
Terms on this page
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary
Author
A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.
Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary
From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source
Second chamber's vote
A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.
Official term: Concurrence
Senate Joint Resolution 1
The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.
Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1
Legislative Reference Bureau
The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.
Official term: LRB analysis
Signed on in support
Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.
Official term: Cosponsor
Roll call
A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.
Official term: Roll call vote