Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 675

Hospital staff privileges for and written agreements required for nurse-midwives and allowing nurse-midwives to elect to be covered under the injured patients and families compensation fund

Topics: Hospitals, Medical malpractice, Medical service, Physician

Passed the Assembly, then stopped

The Assembly passed it on Apr 15, 2010, but the Senate never voted on it. A bill has to ⁠. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, passed

    Passed Apr 15, 2010

  4. Senate vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The Senate never voted on it.

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to concur in pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Practice of nurse-midwifery Under current law, to practice nurse-midwifery a licensed nurse-midwife must collaborate with and enter into a written agreement with a physician who has postgraduate training in obstetrics. If a person practicing nurse-midwifery discovers evidence of any aspect of care that jeopardizes the health or life of a newborn or mother, the nurse-midwife must either consult with the collaborating physician with whom the nurse-midwife has entered into a written agreement or make a referral as specified in the written agreement.

This bill eliminates the requirement that a licensed nurse-midwife collaborate with and enter into a written agreement with a physician. If a person practicing nurse-midwifery discovers evidence of any aspect of care that jeopardizes the health or life of a newborn or mother, a licensed nurse-midwife must consult with a qualified health care professional or make a referral. The bill defines a qualified health care professional as a health care practitioner who is performing services within his or her scope of practice. A health care practitioner is defined under current law to include an individual who is licensed, registered, or certified by the medical examining board, the board of nursing, and the pharmacy examining board.

Read the full summary

Health care liability coverage Under the health care liability statutes in current law, certain health care providers must carry health care liability insurance with specified limits and pay assessments to the injured patients and families compensation fund (fund). Certain other health care providers may elect to be subject to the health care liability statutes, including the insurance and assessment requirements. If a medical malpractice claim is made against a health care provider who is subject to the health care liability statutes, or against an employee of such a health care provider, the portion of the claim that exceeds the limits of the provider's health care liability insurance is paid on behalf of the provider or provider's employee by the fund.

However, certain employees, called health care practitioners, who are providing services not in collaboration with a physician or under the direction and supervision of a physician or nurse anesthetist, are not covered by the fund as employees in the event that a medical malpractice claim is made against them. Nurse-midwives are not required to provide services under the direction and supervision of a physician or nurse anesthetist and since, under the bill, they are no longer required to provide services in collaboration with a physician, they would not be covered by the fund as employees. Therefore, the bill modifies the definition of a health care practitioner to exclude nurse-midwives so that a nurse-midwife is covered by the fund, as under current law, if he or she is providing services as an employee of a health care provider who is subject to the health care liability statutes.

In addition, the bill authorizes nurse-midwives to elect to be subject to the health care liability statutes. If a nurse-midwife elects to be subject to those statutes, the nurse-midwife would be required to carry health care liability insurance with the specified limits, would be required to pay the assessments, and, even if not an employee of a health care provider subject to the health care liability statutes, would be covered by the fund for damages exceeding the limits of the insurance.

Hospital staff privileges Under current law, only a physician, dentist, or podiatrist may admit a patient to a hospital. The bill provides that a hospital may grant to nurse-midwives who are covered under the fund any hospital staff privileges that the hospital must afford to persons who are licensed to practice medicine or podiatry, including hospital staff privileges to admit, treat, and discharge patients for whom nurse-midwives are qualified to provide care.

Who's behind it

8 lawmakers are its ⁠. All 8 are Democrats.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 10 names

Authors (8)

Signed on in support (2)

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There were 3 votes on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 10 to 2 · Mar 11, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote on an amendment

Passed, 53 to 44 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44”. Official record · This vote on its own page

Assembly vote to pass it

Passed, 82 to 15 · Apr 15, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Read a third time and passed, Ayes 82, Noes 15”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 16, 2010

    Sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue.

  3. Apr 16, 2010

    The Senate received it.

  4. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly passed it, 82 to 15.

  5. Apr 15, 2010

    The Assembly adopted it.

  6. Mar 11, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  7. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 3.

  8. Feb 3, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  9. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  10. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Roys, Smith, Berceau, Pasch, Sinicki, Turner, Vruwink and Young;Cosponsored by Senators Robson and Vinehout

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  3. Feb 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  4. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Roys

  5. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Mar 3, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  7. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  8. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 10, Noes 2

  9. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 9, Noes 3

  10. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:28 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  12. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  13. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Vukmir and Nygren

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 1 laid on table, Ayes 53, Noes 44

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 adopted

  17. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  18. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  19. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 82, Noes 15

  20. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  21. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  22. Apr 16, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue

  23. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence. More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Second chamber's vote

A bill has to pass both the Assembly and the Senate in the same form before it goes to the governor.

Official term: Concurrence

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote