Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
temporary restraining orders and injunctions.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill makes numerous changes in the laws concerning petitions for
temporary restraining orders and injunctions related to domestic abuse, child abuse,
adult at risk, or harassment.
Under current law, if a person wants a judge to review a decision of a circuit
court commissioner, the person submits a motion to the circuit court asking for a
hearing before the judge. The court conducts a de novo hearing in which the judge
hears all of the evidence and arguments and makes a decision without regard to the
commissioner's decision. Under this bill, a party seeking judicial review of a circuit
court commissioner's decision regarding a petition for a domestic abuse, child abuse,
adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction must file
the motion with the court within 30 days after the court commissioner's decision.
The bill requires the judge to hold the hearing on that motion within 15 working days
after the hearing is requested.
The bill prohibits a circuit court in an action affecting the family, such as a
divorce action, to enter any order that conflicts with an order entered by a circuit
court regarding a temporary restraining order or injunction for domestic abuse, child
abuse, adult at risk, or harassment; with a contact prohibition issued in conjunction
with a domestic abuse criminal action; or with a condition of probation, parole,
extended supervision, or release.
The bill requires the circuit court to inform the petitioner of the agency that the
person should contact to verify that the petition for a temporary restraining order or
injunction for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment has been
served on the respondent. Currently the circuit court judge or commissioner is
prohibited from dismissing or denying a domestic abuse temporary restraining order
or injunction because of the existence of a pending action or any court order that bars
contact between the parties. The bill expands that prohibition to include any civil
or criminal court order that includes provisions regarding contact between the
parties.
The bill requires a petitioner seeking a domestic abuse, child abuse,
adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction to include
in the petition identifying information about any other civil or criminal court
proceeding that has a court order that includes provisions regarding contact with the
person who is the subject of the petition (respondent).
The bill allows the circuit court to approve a stipulation to convert a domestic
abuse petition to a harassment petition only if, on the record, one or both parties
request the conversion, the court explains the differences between a harassment and
domestic abuse injunction, and the court includes an explanation as to why granting
a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction is not appropriate.
The bill provides the same procedure for the service of a petition upon the
respondent in an action for a harassment temporary restraining order or injunction
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
Passed 12–0 Mar 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Parisi, Roys, Staskunas, Dexter, Suder, Berceau, Turner, Danou, Van Roy, Kaufert, Townsend, Milroy, Sinicki, Bies and A. Williams;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Erpenbach, Robson, Darling, Lassa, Risser, Hansen, A. Lasee, Coggs and Olsen
- Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Senator Lassa withdrawn as a cosponsor
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:29 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1