Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 680

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

temporary restraining orders and injunctions.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill makes numerous changes in the laws concerning petitions for

temporary restraining orders and injunctions related to domestic abuse, child abuse,

adult at risk, or harassment.

Under current law, if a person wants a judge to review a decision of a circuit

court commissioner, the person submits a motion to the circuit court asking for a

hearing before the judge. The court conducts a de novo hearing in which the judge

hears all of the evidence and arguments and makes a decision without regard to the

commissioner's decision. Under this bill, a party seeking judicial review of a circuit

court commissioner's decision regarding a petition for a domestic abuse, child abuse,

adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction must file

the motion with the court within 30 days after the court commissioner's decision.

The bill requires the judge to hold the hearing on that motion within 15 working days

after the hearing is requested.

The bill prohibits a circuit court in an action affecting the family, such as a

divorce action, to enter any order that conflicts with an order entered by a circuit

court regarding a temporary restraining order or injunction for domestic abuse, child

abuse, adult at risk, or harassment; with a contact prohibition issued in conjunction

with a domestic abuse criminal action; or with a condition of probation, parole,

extended supervision, or release.

The bill requires the circuit court to inform the petitioner of the agency that the

person should contact to verify that the petition for a temporary restraining order or

injunction for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment has been

served on the respondent. Currently the circuit court judge or commissioner is

prohibited from dismissing or denying a domestic abuse temporary restraining order

or injunction because of the existence of a pending action or any court order that bars

contact between the parties. The bill expands that prohibition to include any civil

or criminal court order that includes provisions regarding contact between the

parties.

The bill requires a petitioner seeking a domestic abuse, child abuse,

adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction to include

in the petition identifying information about any other civil or criminal court

proceeding that has a court order that includes provisions regarding contact with the

person who is the subject of the petition (respondent).

The bill allows the circuit court to approve a stipulation to convert a domestic

abuse petition to a harassment petition only if, on the record, one or both parties

request the conversion, the court explains the differences between a harassment and

domestic abuse injunction, and the court includes an explanation as to why granting

a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction is not appropriate.

The bill provides the same procedure for the service of a petition upon the

respondent in an action for a harassment temporary restraining order or injunction

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Williams (D) , Berceau (D) , Bies (R) , Danou (D) , Dexter (D) , Hraychuck (D) , Kaufert (R) , Milroy (D) , Parisi (D) , Roys (D) , Sinicki (D) , Staskunas (D) , Suder (R) , Townsend (R) , Turner (D) , Van Roy (R)

9 cosponsors

A. Lasee (R) , Coggs (D) , Darling (R) , Erpenbach (D) , Hansen (D) , Olsen (R) , Risser (D) , Robson (D) , Taylor (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Mar 16, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Parisi, Roys, Staskunas, Dexter, Suder, Berceau, Turner, Danou, Van Roy, Kaufert, Townsend, Milroy, Sinicki, Bies and A. Williams;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Erpenbach, Robson, Darling, Lassa, Risser, Hansen, A. Lasee, Coggs and Olsen

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa withdrawn as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  6. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  7. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  10. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  11. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  12. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:29 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1