Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 680

Temporary restraining orders and injunctions

Topics: Children: Abuse and neglect, Circuit court, Court: Clerk, Court: Commissioner, Court: Procedure, Mental health, Persons with disabilities, Senior citizen, State Courts, Director of, Women

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Jan 22, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

This bill makes numerous changes in the laws concerning petitions for temporary restraining orders and injunctions related to domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment.

Under current law, if a person wants a judge to review a decision of a circuit court commissioner, the person submits a motion to the circuit court asking for a hearing before the judge. The court conducts a de novo hearing in which the judge hears all of the evidence and arguments and makes a decision without regard to the commissioner's decision. Under this bill, a party seeking judicial review of a circuit court commissioner's decision regarding a petition for a domestic abuse, child abuse, adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction must file the motion with the court within 30 days after the court commissioner's decision.

Read the full summary

The bill requires the judge to hold the hearing on that motion within 15 working days after the hearing is requested.

The bill prohibits a circuit court in an action affecting the family, such as a divorce action, to enter any order that conflicts with an order entered by a circuit court regarding a temporary restraining order or injunction for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment; with a contact prohibition issued in conjunction with a domestic abuse criminal action; or with a condition of probation, parole, extended supervision, or release.

The bill requires the circuit court to inform the petitioner of the agency that the person should contact to verify that the petition for a temporary restraining order or injunction for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment has been served on the respondent. Currently the circuit court judge or commissioner is prohibited from dismissing or denying a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction because of the existence of a pending action or any court order that bars contact between the parties. The bill expands that prohibition to include any civil or criminal court order that includes provisions regarding contact between the parties.

The bill requires a petitioner seeking a domestic abuse, child abuse, adult-at-risk, or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction to include in the petition identifying information about any other civil or criminal court proceeding that has a court order that includes provisions regarding contact with the person who is the subject of the petition (respondent).

The bill allows the circuit court to approve a stipulation to convert a domestic abuse petition to a harassment petition only if, on the record, one or both parties request the conversion, the court explains the differences between a harassment and domestic abuse injunction, and the court includes an explanation as to why granting a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction is not appropriate.

The bill provides the same procedure for the service of a petition upon the respondent in an action for a harassment temporary restraining order or injunction as is provided in an action for a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction. The bill also provides parallel language in the statutes regarding the procedure for bringing an action for a harassment temporary restraining order or injunction, providing advice regarding service of the petition on the respondent, limiting the remedies to those petitioned for, and for ordering the sheriff to assist the petitioner in his or her residence as is provided in an action for a domestic abuse temporary restraining order or injunction.

Under the bill, a person under the age of 18, or the parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of the person may petition for a harassment temporary restraining order or injunction and the court may appoint a guardian ad litem for a child who is a petitioner.

The bill requires the clerk of circuit court to provide a person who contacts the circuit court about filing a petition for temporary restraining orders and injunctions for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment, with a document prepared by the director of state courts. The bill requires the document to describe the different types of temporary restraining orders and injunctions, who is eligible, the remedies available for each, and the process necessary to obtain one of the temporary restraining orders or injunctions. The director of state courts is required to provide sufficient copies to the courts without charge.

Under the bill, the circuit court is required to review and rule on a petition for a temporary restraining order for domestic abuse, child abuse, adult at risk, or harassment within two business hours after receipt of the petition. If the court is unable to do so, the bill requires the clerk of circuit court to make arrangements for another court to review the petition within the two-hour period. If the court denies the petition, the bill requires the court to file a written record of the denial that includes the name of the petitioner and the reason for the denial, and to provide the petitioner with a copy of that denial.

Who's behind it

16 lawmakers are its ⁠. 11 are Democrats and 5 are Republicans.

9 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 25 names

Authors (16)

Signed on in support (9)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 0 · Mar 16, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Mar 16, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Mar 16, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 12 to 0.

  4. Mar 11, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  5. Feb 24, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Jan 22, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Corrections and the Courts.

  7. Jan 22, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Parisi, Roys, Staskunas, Dexter, Suder, Berceau, Turner, Danou, Van Roy, Kaufert, Townsend, Milroy, Sinicki, Bies and A. Williams;Cosponsored by Senators Taylor, Erpenbach, Robson, Darling, Lassa, Risser, Hansen, A. Lasee, Coggs and Olsen

  2. Jan 22, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Corrections and the Courts

  3. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Lassa withdrawn as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  6. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Hraychuck

  7. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  8. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  9. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  10. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  11. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Corrections and the Courts, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  12. Mar 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  13. Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:29 A.M. on 4-15-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 22

  14. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  15. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote