Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
using an electronic signature on a criminal complaint.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, a criminal prosecution is begun when a criminal complaint
is filed with a court. The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts
constituting the offense charged. The person who provides the information
contained in the complaint swears to the truth of the information before the district
attorney or a judge.
Current law allows the person to swear to the truth of the statement in the
complaint by telephone contact with the district attorney or judge if the person signs
the statement, sends the original signed statement to the district attorney or judge,
and sends a copy of the signed statement to the district attorney or judge via a
facsimile machine. Subsequently, if the complaint is filed, both the original and the
facsimile copy of the signed statement are filed with the court.
Under this bill, a person may swear to the truth of the statement by telephone
contact with a district attorney or judge and may transmit a copy of the statement
electronically, accompanied by an electronic signature, to the district attorney or
judge. Under the bill, a statement that has been signed and transmitted
electronically may be incorporated into a complaint that is filed with the court
electronically or in paper form.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0
Passed 9–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Turner, Pope-Roberts, Molepske Jr., Van Roy, Kerkman, Townsend, Bies, A. Ott, Ripp and Kaufert;Cosponsored by Senators Jauch, Lehman, Taylor and Schultz
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics
- Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly
Senator Vinehout added as a cosponsor
- Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1