Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 685

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

using an electronic signature on a criminal complaint.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

Under current law, a criminal prosecution is begun when a criminal complaint

is filed with a court. The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts

constituting the offense charged. The person who provides the information

contained in the complaint swears to the truth of the information before the district

attorney or a judge.

Current law allows the person to swear to the truth of the statement in the

complaint by telephone contact with the district attorney or judge if the person signs

the statement, sends the original signed statement to the district attorney or judge,

and sends a copy of the signed statement to the district attorney or judge via a

facsimile machine. Subsequently, if the complaint is filed, both the original and the

facsimile copy of the signed statement are filed with the court.

Under this bill, a person may swear to the truth of the statement by telephone

contact with a district attorney or judge and may transmit a copy of the statement

electronically, accompanied by an electronic signature, to the district attorney or

judge. Under the bill, a statement that has been signed and transmitted

electronically may be incorporated into a complaint that is filed with the court

electronically or in paper form.

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Bies (R) , Hebl (D) , Kaufert (R) , Kerkman (R) , Molepske Jr. (D) , Pope-Roberts (D) , Ripp (R) , Townsend (R) , Turner (D) , Van Roy (R)

5 cosponsors

Jauch (D) , Lehman (D) , Schultz (R) , Taylor (D) , Vinehout (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0

Passed 9–0 Feb 24, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Hebl, Turner, Pope-Roberts, Molepske Jr., Van Roy, Kerkman, Townsend, Bies, A. Ott, Ripp and Kaufert;Cosponsored by Senators Jauch, Lehman, Taylor and Schultz

  2. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics

  3. Jan 25, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Vinehout added as a cosponsor

  4. Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  5. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  7. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Judiciary and Ethics, Ayes 9, Noes 0

  8. Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  9. Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules

  10. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Laid on the table

  11. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1