Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
requiring suspected drug activity on the part of a caregiver or nonclient resident of a child care provider to be reported to an immediate supervisor and to the sheriff and suspected or threatened child abuse or neglect on the part of such an individual to be reported under the child abuse and neglect reporting law and providing a penalty.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, certain persons, such as physicians, teachers, social
workers, and child care workers, who have reasonable cause to suspect that a child
seen in the course of professional duties has been abused or neglected, or who have
reason to believe that a child seen in the course of professional duties has been
threatened with abuse or neglect and that abuse or neglect of the child will occur,
must report the facts and circumstances contributing to that suspicion or belief to the
county department of human services or social services (county department) or, in
Milwaukee County, the Department of Children and Families (DCF) or a licensed
child welfare agency under contract with DCF or to the sheriff or city, village, or town
police department (child abuse and neglect reporting law). A person who makes a
report under the child abuse and neglect reporting law may not be discharged from
employment for doing so and is immune from any liability, civil or criminal, that may
result by reason of making the report.
This bill requires an employee of DCF, a county department, an agency
contracted by DCF to certify day care providers for purposes of reimbursement under
the Wisconsin Works Program (contracted agency), or a school board whose job duties
include performing activities relating to the licensing of day care centers by DCF, the
certification of day care providers by a county department or contracted agency, or
the establishment of or contracting for day care programs by a school board
(employee) and who has reasonable cause to suspect that a caregiver or nonclient
resident of a day care center, day care provider, or day care program (caregiver or
nonclient resident) has abused or neglected a child who is in the care of the day care
center, day care provider, or day care program, or who has reason to believe that a
caregiver or nonclient resident has threatened such a child with abuse or neglect and
that abuse or neglect of the child will occur, to report the facts and circumstances
contributing to that suspicion or belief as required under the child abuse and neglect
reporting law.
The bill also requires an employee who reasonably suspects that a caregiver or
nonclient resident has engaged or is engaging in any drug-related offense to
immediately report the facts and circumstances contributing to that suspicion to the
employee's immediate supervisor, who must immediately evaluate the report to
determine whether there is reason to suspect that the offense has occurred or is
occurring. If the immediate supervisor determines that there is reason to suspect
that the offense has occurred or is occurring, the immediate supervisor must
immediately report the facts and circumstances contributing to that suspicion to the
sheriff.
The immediate supervisor must keep the identity of the reporting employee
confidential. The sheriff must keep the identity of the reporting employee and the
immediate supervisor confidential until the sheriff determines that the report merits
further investigation. If the sheriff conducts a full investigation, the sheriff must
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Introduced by: A. Ott (R) , Ballweg (R) , Bies (R) , Brooks (R) , Davis (R) , Gottlieb (R) , Gunderson (R) , Gundrum (R) , Honadel (R) , Kerkman (R) , Kleefisch (R) , LeMahieu (R) , Lothian (R) , Meyer (R) , Montgomery (R) , Murtha (R) , Petersen (R) , Petrowski (R) , Pridemore (R) , Ripp (R) , Spanbauer (R) , Strachota (R) , Suder (R) , Townsend (R) , Van Roy (R) , Vos (R) , Vukmir (R) , Ziegelbauer (I) , Zipperer (R)
Full history
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Gundrum, Honadel, Ziegelbauer, Davis, Kerkman, Pridemore, Strachota, Montgomery, Vos, LeMahieu, Townsend, Van Roy, Gunderson, Brooks, Suder, Kleefisch, Spanbauer, Murtha, Lothian, Bies, Petersen, Meyer, Vukmir, Ripp, Petrowski, A. Ott, Ballweg, Zipperer and Gottlieb;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Lazich, Plale, Olsen, Cowles and Hopper
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Children and Families
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Withdrawn from committee on Children and Families and referred to committee on Rules pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (3)(c)
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1