Skip to content

Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session

AB 696

Died at session end Official bill text Atom feed

authority of the Public Service Commission over certain telecommunications utilities, telecommunications access charges, universal service fund contributions based on interconnected voice over Internet protocol service, tandem switching provider electronic call records, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.

  1. Introduced, stopped here
  2. Passes Assembly, not reached
  3. Passes Senate, not reached
  4. Governor signs, not reached
  5. Law, not reached

Unfamiliar terms? Glossary

What this bill does

Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill: 1) makes changes to the authority of the Public Service Commission

(PSC) over telecommunications utilities; 2) imposes limits on charges for access

services by telecommunications utilities; 3) specifies the PSC's authority over

interconnected voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) service; 4) makes changes to the

PSC's authority for ensuring universal access to telecommunications service; and 5)

requires certain telecommunications providers to make electronic call records

available to other telecommunications providers.

PSC regulation of telecommunications utilities

Under current law, a telecommunications provider that provides basic local

exchange service is defined to be a telecommunications utility. The PSC's authority

over a telecommunications utility depends on whether the PSC has certified the

telecommunications utility as a telecommunications utility (TU) or an alternative

telecommunications utility (ATU). In general, the PSC has certified as TUs those

telecommunications providers that are incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs)

under federal law, which are telecommunications providers that resulted from the

breakup of the Bell System pursuant to a federal antitrust action. In general, the

PSC has certified as ATUs those telecommunications providers that are competitive

local exchange carriers (CLECs) under federal law, which are telecommunications

providers that compete with ILECs to provide basic local exchange service.

Under current law, TUs are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the PSC,

depending on certain factors, such as whether the TU has elected price regulation,

under which the PSC regulates the rates charged by a TU, but not the TU's rate of

return. The degree of PSC regulation also depends on whether a TU is a cooperative

association, or whether the TU is a "small TU," which is a TU that had fewer than

50,000 access lines in this state on January 1, 1984. With certain exceptions, current

law exempts an ATU from PSC regulation, except that, if certain conditions are

satisfied, the PSC may impose on an ATU a requirement that otherwise applies to

a TU or other public utility.

With respect to ATUs, the bill limits the requirements that the PSC may

impose. Under the bill, the PSC may impose requirements on an ATU that relate

only to the following: 1) submission of stockholder and other business management

information; 2) PSC examination of accounting and other business records; 3) use of

and connection to transmission equipment and property by other

telecommunications providers; 4) confidential treatment of records by the PSC; 5)

rates and costs of unbundled network elements; 6) interconnection agreements and

other interconnection requirements; 7) telephone caller identification, pay-per-call,

and toll-free services; 8) PSC privacy rules; 9) universal service and contributions

to the state universal service fund; 10) impairment of speed, quality or efficiency of

services, products, or facilities offered to consumers; 11) access to

telecommunications emergency services; 12) compliance with price lists, contracts,

What it would cost

Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs

Sponsors

Introduced by: Zepnick (D)

1 cosponsors

Plale (D)

Votes

Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0

Passed 12–0 Apr 9, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38

Passed 60–38 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38

Passed 60–38 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 71, Noes 27

Passed 71–27 Apr 20, 2010 official source full page

No individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Full history

  1. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senator Plale

  2. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities

  3. Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Zepnick

  5. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  6. Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly

    LRB correction (Assembly amendment 1)

  7. Mar 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Zepnick

  8. Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Zepnick

  9. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Zigmunt

  10. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  11. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  12. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  13. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  14. Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  15. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  16. Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly

    Made a special order of business at 11:09 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23

  17. Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Hebl

  18. Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Hebl

  19. Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Smith and Zepnick

  20. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  21. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010

  22. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a second time

  23. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 3 adopted

  24. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38

  25. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38

  26. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 adopted

  27. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 adopted

  28. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered to a third reading

  29. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Rules suspended

  30. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Read a third time and passed, Ayes 71, Noes 27

  31. Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly

    Ordered immediately messaged

  32. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Received from Assembly

  33. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk

  34. Apr 21, 2010 · Senate

    Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail

  35. Apr 28, 2010 · Senate

    Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1