Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
authority of the Public Service Commission over certain telecommunications utilities, telecommunications access charges, universal service fund contributions based on interconnected voice over Internet protocol service, tandem switching provider electronic call records, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
This bill: 1) makes changes to the authority of the Public Service Commission
(PSC) over telecommunications utilities; 2) imposes limits on charges for access
services by telecommunications utilities; 3) specifies the PSC's authority over
interconnected voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) service; 4) makes changes to the
PSC's authority for ensuring universal access to telecommunications service; and 5)
requires certain telecommunications providers to make electronic call records
available to other telecommunications providers.
PSC regulation of telecommunications utilities
Under current law, a telecommunications provider that provides basic local
exchange service is defined to be a telecommunications utility. The PSC's authority
over a telecommunications utility depends on whether the PSC has certified the
telecommunications utility as a telecommunications utility (TU) or an alternative
telecommunications utility (ATU). In general, the PSC has certified as TUs those
telecommunications providers that are incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs)
under federal law, which are telecommunications providers that resulted from the
breakup of the Bell System pursuant to a federal antitrust action. In general, the
PSC has certified as ATUs those telecommunications providers that are competitive
local exchange carriers (CLECs) under federal law, which are telecommunications
providers that compete with ILECs to provide basic local exchange service.
Under current law, TUs are subject to varying degrees of regulation by the PSC,
depending on certain factors, such as whether the TU has elected price regulation,
under which the PSC regulates the rates charged by a TU, but not the TU's rate of
return. The degree of PSC regulation also depends on whether a TU is a cooperative
association, or whether the TU is a "small TU," which is a TU that had fewer than
50,000 access lines in this state on January 1, 1984. With certain exceptions, current
law exempts an ATU from PSC regulation, except that, if certain conditions are
satisfied, the PSC may impose on an ATU a requirement that otherwise applies to
a TU or other public utility.
With respect to ATUs, the bill limits the requirements that the PSC may
impose. Under the bill, the PSC may impose requirements on an ATU that relate
only to the following: 1) submission of stockholder and other business management
information; 2) PSC examination of accounting and other business records; 3) use of
and connection to transmission equipment and property by other
telecommunications providers; 4) confidential treatment of records by the PSC; 5)
rates and costs of unbundled network elements; 6) interconnection agreements and
other interconnection requirements; 7) telephone caller identification, pay-per-call,
and toll-free services; 8) PSC privacy rules; 9) universal service and contributions
to the state universal service fund; 10) impairment of speed, quality or efficiency of
services, products, or facilities offered to consumers; 11) access to
telecommunications emergency services; 12) compliance with price lists, contracts,
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0
Passed 12–0 Apr 9, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38
Passed 60–38 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38
Passed 60–38 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Assembly: Read a third time and passed, Ayes 71, Noes 27
Passed 71–27 Apr 20, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representative Zepnick;Cosponsored by Senator Plale
- Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Energy and Utilities
- Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 8, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Zepnick
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly
LRB correction (Assembly amendment 1)
- Mar 15, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Zepnick
- Mar 24, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Zepnick
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representatives Zepnick and Zigmunt
- Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Energy and Utilities, Ayes 12, Noes 0
- Apr 9, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Made a special order of business at 11:09 A.M. on 4-20-2010 pursuant to Assembly Resolution 23
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Hebl
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Hebl
- Apr 19, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representatives Smith and Zepnick
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Placed at the foot of the calendar of 4-20-2010
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 to Assembly amendment 3 adopted
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 to Assembly amendment 3 laid on table, Ayes 60, Noes 38
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 3 adopted
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 4 adopted
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 71, Noes 27
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk
- Apr 21, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy, and Rail
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1