Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 697

The BadgerCare Plus Basic Plan, Benchmark Plan benefits, and making an appropriation

Topics: Health Services, Department of: Health, Insurance: Health, Poor

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 1, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law authorizes the Department of Health Services (DHS) to establish a Medical Assistance (MA) health care benefit plan providing basic primary and preventive care for adults under age 65 who have family incomes not exceeding 200 percent of the poverty line and who are not otherwise eligible for MA or Medicare.

This plan for childless adults is commonly known as the BadgerCare Plus Core Plan (Core Plan). Due to the volume of applications for the plan, which exceeded the plan's ability to provide benefits for all who applied, DHS suspended enrollment on October 9, 2009, and established a waiting list.

Read the full summary

This bill authorizes DHS to establish and operate, no sooner than March 1, 2010, another health care benefit plan for individuals who are on the waiting list for the Core Plan. The health care benefit plan, which is not MA and which will be known as the BadgerCare Plus Basic Plan (Basic Plan), will provide primary and preventive care, and the benefits may not exceed those provided under the Core Plan.

The Basic Plan, including both benefits and administration, will be funded entirely from premiums set by DHS and paid by individuals with coverage under the Basic Plan. To enroll, an individual must submit the first month's premium along with his or her application. Thereafter the individual must pay the premium for a month's coverage in the preceding month. If an individual with coverage under the Basic Plan is removed from the Core Plan waiting list and begins receiving coverage under the Core Plan, DHS will not refund any portion of a premium that the individual paid for coverage under the Basic Plan for the month in which his or her coverage under the Core Plan commences, but DHS will waive any enrollment fee that the individual would have had to pay for enrolling in the Core Plan. An individual whose coverage under the Basic Plan terminates for any reason, including for failure to pay a premium when due, is not again eligible for coverage under the Basic Plan for 12 months, unless the individual's coverage terminated for a good cause reason. DHS may set a deductible not exceeding $7,500 per enrollment year for inpatient and nonemergency outpatient hospital services, as well as other cost-sharing requirements.

DHS will pay a provider that provides services to individuals with coverage under the Basic Plan if the provider is certified by DHS to provide services under MA.

For those services, DHS will pay a certified provider an amount that is no higher than the amount that is payable for the service under MA. A certified provider may not bill the individual who received the service for any additional amount, other than cost sharing established by DHS, and a certified provider may not charge a covered individual an amount that is higher than the amount that DHS would pay the provider for inpatient or nonemergency outpatient hospital services to which a deductible applies.

Any individual who is denied coverage under the Basic Plan or whose coverage is discontinued may file a written request for review by DHS and must exhaust that process before commencing any action in court. DHS may recover amounts incorrectly paid on behalf of an individual if the individual, when first enrolled, was on the Core Plan waiting list due to a misstatement or omission of fact made by the individual, or if the individual's coverage under the Basic Plan was continued due to a misstatement or omission of fact made by the individual.

Also under current law, DHS administers BadgerCare Plus, which is an MA program that provides health care benefits under two different plans, depending on the basis for a recipient's eligibility, to recipients who satisfy financial and nonfinancial eligibility criteria. One of the plans, known as the Benchmark Plan, provides specified benefits, including transportation to obtain emergency medical care. The bill expands the transportation benefit under the Benchmark Plan so that transportation to obtain medical care, rather than just emergency medical care, is covered. The bill also specifically adds as a benefit for recipients under the age of 21 early and periodic screening and diagnosis, and all services included under the federal definition of "medical assistance" that are found necessary as a result of the screening and diagnosis. Currently under the Benchmark Plan recipients under the age of 19 receive early and periodic screening and diagnosis and services found necessary as a result of the screening and diagnosis.

Who's behind it

Jon Richards, a Democrat, is its ⁠.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 3 names

Author (1)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

Versions and amendments

Every text the Legislature printed for this bill, including proposed changes. Each opens on the Legislature's site.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform vote on an amendment

Passed, 12 to 0 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 8 to 4.

  4. Feb 16, 2010

    1 more senator signed on in support.

  5. Feb 10, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  6. Feb 5, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  7. Feb 1, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Health and Healthcare Reform.

  8. Feb 1, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representative Richards;Cosponsored by Senator Erpenbach

  2. Feb 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Healthcare Reform

  3. Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Feb 10, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly

    Senator Jauch added as a cosponsor

  6. Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representatives Rhoades, Strachota, Nygren, Stone and Vukmir

  7. Mar 5, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Rhoades

  8. Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 3 offered by Representative Richards

  9. Mar 26, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 4 offered by Representative Richards

  10. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 5 offered by Representative Richards

  11. Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 6 offered by Representatives Shilling and Bernard Schaber

  12. Mar 30, 2010 · Assembly

    Assembly amendment 7 offered by Representative Nygren

  13. Mar 31, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  14. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  15. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  16. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 5 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  17. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 12, Noes 0

  18. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Health and Healthcare Reform, Ayes 8, Noes 4

  19. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  20. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote