Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
adjudications for involuntary commitment, appointment of a guardian of the person, and protective placement or protective services, background checks for the purchase of handguns, and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, if a person seeks to purchase a handgun from a licensed
handgun dealer, the dealer must ask the Department of Justice (DOJ) to conduct a
background check on the person. In conducting the background check, DOJ searches
DOJ records to determine whether the person is ineligible to possess a firearm under
state law, but state law does not explicitly require DOJ to determine whether federal
law bars the person from possessing a firearm based on criteria not covered by state
law. This bill requires DOJ, when conducting a background check on a prospective
handgun purchaser, to check whether the person has been the subject of a court order
or finding that is based on a determination that the person's mental health would
render the person ineligible under federal law to possess a firearm.
This bill requires courts to determine whether a person would be ineligible
under federal law to possess a firearm during proceedings for involuntary
commitment for persons found by the court to be mentally ill, drug dependent, or
developmentally disabled and to be dangerous, during proceedings for appointment
of a guardian of the person for an individual found by the court to be incompetent,
and, if not previously determined, during proceedings under which a court orders
protective placement or protective services (mental health proceeding). If the court
determines that federal law prohibits the person from possessing a firearm, the court
must order the person not to possess a firearm, order the seizure of any firearm the
person owns, and inform the person that he or she would be committing a felony if
he or she possessed a firearm. The court must then convey the disqualified status
to DOJ which may use that information only during background checks conducted
when the person seeks to purchase a handgun or under rules that DOJ promulgates
in order to provide information to the national instant criminal background check
system.
Specifically, to determine ineligibility under federal law at a mental health
proceeding, a court must determine if the person has been "adjudicated as a mental
defective" or "committed to a mental institution," as defined in federal law. Under
federal law, "adjudicated as a mental defective" means a determination by a court,
board, commission, or other lawful authority that a person, as a result of a marked
subnormal intelligence, or a mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease
either is a danger to himself or herself or to others or lacks the mental capacity to
contract or manage his or her own affairs. This determination includes a finding of
insanity by a court in a criminal case and persons found incompetent to stand trial
or found not guilty by reason of lack of mental responsibility pursuant to the Uniform
Code of Military Justice. Federal law defines "committed to a mental institution" as
a formal commitment of a person to a mental institution by a court, board,
commission, or other lawful authority. The term includes a commitment to a mental
institution involuntarily, commitment for mental defectiveness or mental illness,
and commitments for other reasons such as for drug use. The term does not include
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
Passed 10–0 Feb 16, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Gunderson, Richards, Murtha, Fields, Ballweg, Bies, Kaufert, Kerkman, LeMahieu, Lothian, Nygren, Petersen, Stone, Townsend, Van Roy, Vos, Spanbauer and Kleefisch;Cosponsored by Senators Darling, Sullivan, Harsdorf, Olsen and Schultz
- Feb 17, 2009 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Feb 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 25, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 5, 2009 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Mar 5, 2009 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 24, 2009 · Assembly
LRB correction
- Jul 8, 2009 · Assembly
Assembly substitute amendment 1 offered by Representative Gunderson
- Feb 4, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 16, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 10, Noes 0
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-15-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 15, 2010 · Assembly
Laid on the table
- Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1