Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
correcting errors in the assessment of counties and taxation districts by the Department of Revenue.
- Introduced, stopped here
- Passes Assembly, not reached
- Passes Senate, not reached
- Governor signs, not reached
- Law, not reached
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, the Department of Revenue (DOR) annually completes an
assessment of the property located in each county or taxation district. That
assessment becomes the county's and taxation district's "equalized value" for the
year of the assessment. If DOR discovers an error in its equalized value for any
county or municipality, DOR, generally, corrects the error by adjusting the equalized
value for the year after the year in which the error occurred.
Under this bill, DOR must recertify a taxation district's equalized value in the
same year that an error is discovered if all of the following apply:
1. DOR discovers the error before October 1 of the year for which the error
relates.
2. The amount of the error increases or decreases the equalized value by more
than $10,000,000.
3. The amount of the error exceeds an amount equal to 7.5 percent of the
taxation district's corrected equalized value, excluding any value attributable to
value increments in tax incremental districts.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
Passed 7–0 Mar 29, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hixson, Davis, Kaufert, Turner, Benedict and Townsend;Cosponsored by Senators Robson, Schultz, Lassa, Erpenbach and Coggs
- Feb 5, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Urban and Local Affairs
- Feb 19, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 23, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 offered by Representative Hixson
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Mar 17, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 offered by Representative Hixson
- Mar 23, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Mar 29, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage as amended recommended by committee on Urban and Local Affairs, Ayes 7, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 4-13-2010 by committee on Rules
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 1 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Assembly amendment 2 adopted
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Apr 13, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Apr 14, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Health, Health Insurance, Privacy, Property Tax Relief, and Revenue
- Apr 28, 2010 · Senate
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1