Bills · 2009-2010 Regular Session
mutual assistance between tribal and county or municipal law enforcement agencies.
- Introduced, completed
- Passes Assembly, completed
- Passes Senate, completed
- Governor signs, completed
- Law, completed
Unfamiliar terms? Glossary
What this bill does
Plain-language analysis by the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, one law enforcement agency may respond to a request for
assistance from another law enforcement agency. The requesting agency is
responsible for defending a responding officer in a civil action arising out of the
officer's response and for indemnifying the officer for the amount of any civil
penalties imposed or damages awarded in such an action. The responding agency
is responsible for personnel costs (such as the salary and benefits of the responding
officers) and other costs related to a response (such as damage to equipment), but
may bill the requesting agency for these costs. Current law does not apply to tribal
law enforcement agencies.
This bill authorizes tribal law enforcement agencies both to request assistance
from state, county, and municipal law enforcement agencies and to respond to
requests for assistance from such agencies. It assigns responsibility for defending
and indemnifying officers in civil actions arising out of a response and responsibility
for the costs associated with a response in the same manner as current law.
To ensure that a tribe's responsibility for the costs of a law enforcement agency
that responds to its request for assistance can be enforced, however, the bill limits
the authority of a state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency to respond to
a request for assistance from a tribal law enforcement agency to cases in which one
of the following applies:
1. The tribe has adopted a resolution waiving its sovereign immunity to the
extent required to allow enforcement of this responsibility in state courts or a
resolution that the Department of Justice (DOJ) determines has the same effect.
2. The tribe maintains insurance to cover these costs up to specified limits.
3. The responding law enforcement agency has an agreement with the tribal
law enforcement agency under which the responding law enforcement agency
accepts the responsibility for these costs.
The bill requires that, for one of the foregoing actions to have the effect of
allowing a nontribal law enforcement agency to respond to a request for assistance
from a tribal law enforcement agency, the tribal law enforcement agency must have
provided a copy of the resolution, insurance policy, or agreement to DOJ, and DOJ
must have posted the document or a notice of the document on the Internet site that
it maintains for exchanging information with law enforcement agencies.
What it would cost
Fiscal estimates filed by state agencies, as official PDFs
Sponsors
Votes
Assembly: Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 11, Noes 0
Passed 11–0 Mar 2, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Senate: Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
Passed 5–0 Apr 7, 2010 official source full pageNo individual roll call was recorded for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.
Full history
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Introduced by Representatives Hraychuck, Turner, Sherman, Pasch, Hubler, Berceau, Ballweg, Mursau, Molepske Jr. and Vos;Cosponsored by Senators Jauch, Coggs, Taylor, Harsdorf, Holperin, Vinehout, Schultz, Lehman, Miller and Grothman
- Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly
Read first time and referred to committee on Criminal Justice
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Fiscal estimate received
- Feb 17, 2010 · Assembly
Public hearing held
- Feb 24, 2010 · Assembly
Executive action taken
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Report passage recommended by committee on Criminal Justice, Ayes 11, Noes 0
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Referred to committee on Rules
- Mar 2, 2010 · Assembly
Placed on calendar 3-4-2010 by committee on Rules
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Rules suspended
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a third time and passed
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered immediately messaged
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Read a second time
- Mar 4, 2010 · Assembly
Ordered to a third reading
- Mar 5, 2010 · Senate
Received from Assembly
- Mar 8, 2010 · Senate
Read first time and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations
- Mar 17, 2010 · Senate
Public hearing held
- Apr 6, 2010 · Senate
Executive action taken
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Report concurrence recommended by committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations, Ayes 5, Noes 0
- Apr 7, 2010 · Senate
Available for scheduling
- Apr 16, 2010 · Senate
Placed on calendar 4-20-2010 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a second time
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered to a third reading
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Rules suspended
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Read a third time and concurred in
- Apr 20, 2010 · Senate
Ordered immediately messaged
- Apr 20, 2010 · Assembly
Received from Senate concurred in
- May 6, 2010 · Assembly
Report correctly enrolled
- May 6, 2010 · Assembly
Presented to the Governor on 5-6-2010
- May 7, 2010 · Assembly
Report approved by the Governor on 5-7-2010. 2009 Wisconsin Act 264
- May 10, 2010 · Assembly
Published 5-21-2010