Skip to content
Bills from the 2009–10 session

Assembly Bill 719

Motor vehicle emission inspections and requiring the exercise of rule-making authority

Topics: Motor vehicle: Dealers and finance companies, Motor vehicle: Regulation, Transportation, Department of: Vehicles

Stopped before the full Assembly voted

The recommended passing it, but the full Assembly never voted on it. To try again, a lawmaker would have to start a new bill.

  1. Introduced, passed

    Feb 9, 2010

  2. Committee, passed

    Approved

  3. Assembly vote, stopped here

    Stopped here. The full Assembly never voted on it.

  4. Senate vote, not reached

  5. Governor, not reached

  6. Law, not reached

Latest entry in the official record, Apr 28, 2010: “Failed to pass pursuant to ⁠”

Read the bill

Following saves it on this device. New actions show on your Following page. You can also get updates in a feed reader.

What it would have done

Summary by the , the Legislature's nonpartisan drafting office. It's their wording, not ours.

Current law requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to conduct a motor vehicle emission inspection and maintenance program (I/M program) in counties in which the air quality does not meet certain federal standards. Under the I/M program, most motor vehicles that are subject to emission limitations established by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) must pass periodic emission inspections and may not be registered by DOT unless they have passed these inspections. DOT may contract with third parties to perform vehicle emission inspections under the I/M program. Current law prohibits DOT from contracting with a person engaged in the business of selling, maintaining, or repairing motor vehicles or of selling motor vehicle replacement or repair parts (vehicle dealer or servicer). Current law also provides that, if a vehicle fails to pass an emission inspection, any repair or adjustment necessary to bring the vehicle into compliance with applicable emission limitations may be made by the vehicle owner or by any person selected by the owner.

This bill allows DOT to contract with any person to perform vehicle emission inspections under the I/M program, including a vehicle dealer or servicer. The bill also specifies that DOT may allow third-party contractors to enter into subcontracts for the performance of the contractor's functions or duties, but the subcontractor must comply with all requirements applicable to the contractor. With DOT's approval, the third-party contractor may also subcontract with a vehicle dealer or servicer. The bill also allows vehicle emission inspections to be performed by DOT or by persons who are authorized by DOT to perform the inspections but who are not under contract with DOT. If an emission inspection is performed by a vehicle dealer or servicer, and the vehicle fails the inspection, the vehicle dealer or servicer must advise the vehicle owner that the owner is not required to have any necessary repair or adjustment made by, or to purchase any necessary service or part from, the vehicle dealer or servicer and has the right to select a vendor of the owner's own choice. DOT rules must require each vehicle dealer or servicer that performs emission inspections to periodically report to DOT information related to vehicle repairs and reinspections after a failed inspection. DOT must make information gathered from these reports available to the public.

Read the full summary

The bill allows DOT, with the concurrence of DNR, to grant temporary vehicle emission inspection exemptions during any period in which DOT is unable to operate the I/M program. The bill requires DOT to prescribe procedures for granting temporary vehicle emission inspection exemptions and for authorizing persons other than contractors to perform motor vehicle emission inspections.

Who's behind it

5 representatives are its ⁠. 3 are Democrats and 2 are Republicans.

2 more lawmakers ⁠.

See all 7 names

Authors (5)

Signed on in support (2)

What it would cost

State agencies filed a . Each opens as a PDF from the Legislature.

How lawmakers voted

There was one vote on this bill.

Assembly Committee on Transportation vote to recommend it

Passed, 9 to 1 · Apr 2, 2010

No member-by-member record exists for this vote. Committee votes and some older sessions record totals only.

Official motion: “Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 1”. Official record · This vote on its own page

What happened

  1. Apr 28, 2010

    The session ended, and the bill died with it.

  2. Apr 2, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Rules.

  3. Apr 2, 2010

    The committee voted to recommend passing it, 9 to 1.

  4. Mar 11, 2010

    The committee held a public hearing.

  5. Feb 18, 2010

    A state agency sent in its estimate of the cost.

  6. Feb 9, 2010

    Sent to the Assembly Committee on Transportation.

  7. Feb 9, 2010

    Introduced in the Assembly.

See the official record, word for word
  1. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Introduced by Representatives Steinbrink, Gottlieb, Honadel, Pasch and Sinicki;Cosponsored by Senators Wirch and Taylor

  2. Feb 9, 2010 · Assembly

    Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation

  3. Feb 18, 2010 · Assembly

    Fiscal estimate received

  4. Mar 11, 2010 · Assembly

    Public hearing held

  5. Apr 1, 2010 · Assembly

    Executive action taken

  6. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Report passage recommended by committee on Transportation, Ayes 9, Noes 1

  7. Apr 2, 2010 · Assembly

    Referred to committee on Rules

  8. Apr 28, 2010 · Assembly

    Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Terms on this page

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

More in the glossary

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1. More in the glossary

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis. More in the glossary

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor. More in the glossary

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor. More in the glossary

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate. More in the glossary

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote. More in the glossary

From the Wisconsin Legislature's official record, checked Sep 15, 2026. See the source

Committee

A small group of lawmakers that looks at a bill first. Most bills never leave committee.

Senate Joint Resolution 1

The session's calendar. Any bill not passed by its last voting day dies.

Official term: Failed to pass pursuant to SJR 1

Legislative Reference Bureau

The Legislature's nonpartisan office that drafts bills and writes the summary at the top of each one.

Official term: LRB analysis

Author

A lawmaker who formally puts a bill forward. The text itself is drafted by the Legislative Reference Bureau.

Official term: Author, coauthor

Signed on in support

Lawmakers who back a bill without being one of its authors, often from the other chamber.

Official term: Cosponsor

Cost estimate

A state agency's estimate of what a bill would cost or save.

Official term: Fiscal estimate

Roll call

A vote where each lawmaker's yes or no is recorded by name.

Official term: Roll call vote